更摩尔:愚蠢,可行,还是根本不同?

R. Aitken, J. Bautista, Wojciech Maly, J. Rabaey
{"title":"更摩尔:愚蠢,可行,还是根本不同?","authors":"R. Aitken, J. Bautista, Wojciech Maly, J. Rabaey","doi":"10.1109/ICCAD.2008.4681540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Moore's law has been a foundation of modern electronics, sustained primarily by scaling. But can this continue despite the serious problems of litho, variability, device physics, and cost? This panel looks at several possibilities. Perhaps Moore's law will muddle through, as it has so far, with a combination of tools, process, and design. But even if technically possible, Moore's law is in practice driven by economics, and economics might turn against further scaling. Also, we've all seen how performance of single cores has topped out, despite scaling. Might this be a fundamental problem with planar technologies, prompting the need to go 3-D to get further performance increases? Or might CMOS itself give way to other technologies, allowing Moore's law yet another respite? Compare and contrast for yourself these four very different visions of the future of your job, your industry, and your personal gadgets.","PeriodicalId":90518,"journal":{"name":"ICCAD. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/ICCAD.2008.4681540","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More Moore: foolish, feasible, or fundamentally different?\",\"authors\":\"R. Aitken, J. Bautista, Wojciech Maly, J. Rabaey\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCAD.2008.4681540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Moore's law has been a foundation of modern electronics, sustained primarily by scaling. But can this continue despite the serious problems of litho, variability, device physics, and cost? This panel looks at several possibilities. Perhaps Moore's law will muddle through, as it has so far, with a combination of tools, process, and design. But even if technically possible, Moore's law is in practice driven by economics, and economics might turn against further scaling. Also, we've all seen how performance of single cores has topped out, despite scaling. Might this be a fundamental problem with planar technologies, prompting the need to go 3-D to get further performance increases? Or might CMOS itself give way to other technologies, allowing Moore's law yet another respite? Compare and contrast for yourself these four very different visions of the future of your job, your industry, and your personal gadgets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ICCAD. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/ICCAD.2008.4681540\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ICCAD. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAD.2008.4681540\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ICCAD. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAD.2008.4681540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摩尔定律一直是现代电子学的基础,主要靠缩放来维持。但是,尽管存在光刻、可变性、设备物理和成本等严重问题,这种趋势能否持续下去?本小组探讨了几种可能性。也许摩尔定律会像迄今为止一样,通过工具、流程和设计的结合来应付过去。但即使技术上可行,摩尔定律在实践中也是由经济学驱动的,而经济学可能会反对进一步扩大规模。此外,我们都看到了单核的性能如何在扩展的情况下达到顶峰。这可能是平面技术的一个根本问题,促使人们需要3d技术来进一步提高性能吗?或者CMOS本身可能会让位于其他技术,让摩尔定律再次得到喘息的机会?对你的工作、你的行业和你的个人设备的未来这四种截然不同的愿景进行比较和对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
More Moore: foolish, feasible, or fundamentally different?
Moore's law has been a foundation of modern electronics, sustained primarily by scaling. But can this continue despite the serious problems of litho, variability, device physics, and cost? This panel looks at several possibilities. Perhaps Moore's law will muddle through, as it has so far, with a combination of tools, process, and design. But even if technically possible, Moore's law is in practice driven by economics, and economics might turn against further scaling. Also, we've all seen how performance of single cores has topped out, despite scaling. Might this be a fundamental problem with planar technologies, prompting the need to go 3-D to get further performance increases? Or might CMOS itself give way to other technologies, allowing Moore's law yet another respite? Compare and contrast for yourself these four very different visions of the future of your job, your industry, and your personal gadgets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信