资本主义、社会主义与发展人权

IF 0.4 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Justin Theodra
{"title":"资本主义、社会主义与发展人权","authors":"Justin Theodra","doi":"10.1080/21598282.2022.2074513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The “right to development” (RTD) is an important third generation human right that interrelates political and economic rights, challenging traditional economistic conceptions of development. However, the abstract and socially neutral human rights framework of the RTD results in problematic ambiguities. The relative weights of individual and collective rights to development, and political and economic aspects of the RTD are unclear. This renders the RTD “operationally meaningless” and vulnerable to co-optation. I argue that capitalism is inimical to the realization of the RTD, owing to its exploitative, alienating, and crisis-ridden character. Development cannot be properly understood as an abstract right but must be conceived as a concrete historical process of socialist transition. Development is neither a purely technical nor a purely ethical process, but a fundamentally social and intersocietal one. The dialectic of forces and relations of production is at the heart of this process, therefore development necessitates going beyond capitalist relations of production. Thus, the framework of socialist transition foregrounds the systemic roots of underdevelopment, and in doing so provides a basis for prioritizing between contradictory development policies. Hence, development should be understood and pursued through historical materialism and socialist praxis rather than a rights-based approach.","PeriodicalId":43179,"journal":{"name":"International Critical Thought","volume":"272 3","pages":"253 - 270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capitalism, Socialism and the Human Right to Development\",\"authors\":\"Justin Theodra\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21598282.2022.2074513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The “right to development” (RTD) is an important third generation human right that interrelates political and economic rights, challenging traditional economistic conceptions of development. However, the abstract and socially neutral human rights framework of the RTD results in problematic ambiguities. The relative weights of individual and collective rights to development, and political and economic aspects of the RTD are unclear. This renders the RTD “operationally meaningless” and vulnerable to co-optation. I argue that capitalism is inimical to the realization of the RTD, owing to its exploitative, alienating, and crisis-ridden character. Development cannot be properly understood as an abstract right but must be conceived as a concrete historical process of socialist transition. Development is neither a purely technical nor a purely ethical process, but a fundamentally social and intersocietal one. The dialectic of forces and relations of production is at the heart of this process, therefore development necessitates going beyond capitalist relations of production. Thus, the framework of socialist transition foregrounds the systemic roots of underdevelopment, and in doing so provides a basis for prioritizing between contradictory development policies. Hence, development should be understood and pursued through historical materialism and socialist praxis rather than a rights-based approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Critical Thought\",\"volume\":\"272 3\",\"pages\":\"253 - 270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Critical Thought\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21598282.2022.2074513\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Critical Thought","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21598282.2022.2074513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

发展权是一项重要的第三代人权,它将政治权利和经济权利联系在一起,挑战了传统的经济发展观。然而,RTD的抽象和社会中立的人权框架导致了模棱两可的问题。个人和集体的发展权利,以及RTD的政治和经济方面的相对权重是不清楚的。这使得RTD“在操作上毫无意义”,容易被合并。我认为,由于资本主义的剥削性、疏离性和危机缠身的特点,它不利于RTD的实现。发展不能被理解为一种抽象的权利,而必须被理解为社会主义转型的一个具体的历史过程。发展既不是纯粹的技术过程,也不是纯粹的伦理过程,而是从根本上讲是社会和社会间的过程。力量和生产关系的辩证关系是这一过程的核心,因此发展必须超越资本主义生产关系。因此,社会主义转型的框架突出了不发达的系统根源,这样做为在相互矛盾的发展政策之间确定优先次序提供了基础。因此,应该通过历史唯物主义和社会主义实践来理解和追求发展,而不是以权利为基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Capitalism, Socialism and the Human Right to Development
ABSTRACT The “right to development” (RTD) is an important third generation human right that interrelates political and economic rights, challenging traditional economistic conceptions of development. However, the abstract and socially neutral human rights framework of the RTD results in problematic ambiguities. The relative weights of individual and collective rights to development, and political and economic aspects of the RTD are unclear. This renders the RTD “operationally meaningless” and vulnerable to co-optation. I argue that capitalism is inimical to the realization of the RTD, owing to its exploitative, alienating, and crisis-ridden character. Development cannot be properly understood as an abstract right but must be conceived as a concrete historical process of socialist transition. Development is neither a purely technical nor a purely ethical process, but a fundamentally social and intersocietal one. The dialectic of forces and relations of production is at the heart of this process, therefore development necessitates going beyond capitalist relations of production. Thus, the framework of socialist transition foregrounds the systemic roots of underdevelopment, and in doing so provides a basis for prioritizing between contradictory development policies. Hence, development should be understood and pursued through historical materialism and socialist praxis rather than a rights-based approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Critical Thought
International Critical Thought POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信