Maíra Fernandes Alencar, Brígida Maria Nogueira Cervantes
{"title":"从认识论、科学结构和术语三个视角来看待巴西知识组织的认识论维度","authors":"Maíra Fernandes Alencar, Brígida Maria Nogueira Cervantes","doi":"10.22201/IIBI.24488321XE.2021.89.58457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the study is to present a mapping of the works that were presented in the epistemological dimension. The methodology used was content analysis for purposes of categorization and domain analysis with three study approaches: 1) Epistemological - to identify the themes of research; 2) Structure of scientific communication - whose focus is on describing year, authors and institutions; and finally, 3) Terminological studies, by extracting from the titles of publications representative terms, to categorize and collate with the Brazilian Thesaurus of Information Science and the Diccionario de organizacion del conocimiento: Clasificacion, Indizacion, Terminologia. The results reveal that the themes are predominant on a conceptual basis, followed by interdisciplinary dialogues; the work is carried out by 26 (twenty-six) institutions with the highest incidence at the Universidade Estadual Paulista “Julio de Mesquita Filho” Campus - Marilia; and with regard to terminological studies, based on categorization, the terms that prevail in the titles come from the areas of Thematic Treatment of Information and Knowledge Organization Systems, with a medium level of compatibility in terminological instruments.","PeriodicalId":44196,"journal":{"name":"Investigacion Bibliotecologica","volume":"35 2","pages":"195-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mirando la dimensión epistemológica de la organización del conocimiento brasileño con tres lentes de análisis de dominio: epistemológico, de estructuración científica y terminológico\",\"authors\":\"Maíra Fernandes Alencar, Brígida Maria Nogueira Cervantes\",\"doi\":\"10.22201/IIBI.24488321XE.2021.89.58457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of the study is to present a mapping of the works that were presented in the epistemological dimension. The methodology used was content analysis for purposes of categorization and domain analysis with three study approaches: 1) Epistemological - to identify the themes of research; 2) Structure of scientific communication - whose focus is on describing year, authors and institutions; and finally, 3) Terminological studies, by extracting from the titles of publications representative terms, to categorize and collate with the Brazilian Thesaurus of Information Science and the Diccionario de organizacion del conocimiento: Clasificacion, Indizacion, Terminologia. The results reveal that the themes are predominant on a conceptual basis, followed by interdisciplinary dialogues; the work is carried out by 26 (twenty-six) institutions with the highest incidence at the Universidade Estadual Paulista “Julio de Mesquita Filho” Campus - Marilia; and with regard to terminological studies, based on categorization, the terms that prevail in the titles come from the areas of Thematic Treatment of Information and Knowledge Organization Systems, with a medium level of compatibility in terminological instruments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigacion Bibliotecologica\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"195-211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigacion Bibliotecologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22201/IIBI.24488321XE.2021.89.58457\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigacion Bibliotecologica","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/IIBI.24488321XE.2021.89.58457","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是在认识论维度上呈现作品的映射。使用的方法是内容分析,目的是分类和领域分析,有三种研究方法:1)认识论-确定研究主题;2)科学传播的结构——其重点是描述年份、作者和机构;3)术语研究,从出版物的标题中提取具有代表性的术语,并与巴西信息科学同义词库和经济组织词典进行分类和整理:classiacion, Indizacion, Terminologia。结果表明,主题在概念基础上占主导地位,其次是跨学科对话;这项工作由26个(26个)机构开展,其中最高的发生率在universsidade Estadual Paulista“Julio de Mesquita Filho”校区- Marilia;关于以分类为基础的术语研究,标题中普遍使用的术语来自《信息和知识组织系统专题处理》领域,在术语文书中具有中等程度的兼容性。
Mirando la dimensión epistemológica de la organización del conocimiento brasileño con tres lentes de análisis de dominio: epistemológico, de estructuración científica y terminológico
The objective of the study is to present a mapping of the works that were presented in the epistemological dimension. The methodology used was content analysis for purposes of categorization and domain analysis with three study approaches: 1) Epistemological - to identify the themes of research; 2) Structure of scientific communication - whose focus is on describing year, authors and institutions; and finally, 3) Terminological studies, by extracting from the titles of publications representative terms, to categorize and collate with the Brazilian Thesaurus of Information Science and the Diccionario de organizacion del conocimiento: Clasificacion, Indizacion, Terminologia. The results reveal that the themes are predominant on a conceptual basis, followed by interdisciplinary dialogues; the work is carried out by 26 (twenty-six) institutions with the highest incidence at the Universidade Estadual Paulista “Julio de Mesquita Filho” Campus - Marilia; and with regard to terminological studies, based on categorization, the terms that prevail in the titles come from the areas of Thematic Treatment of Information and Knowledge Organization Systems, with a medium level of compatibility in terminological instruments.