休闲和精神上的幸福:对鲍尔和范莱文的回应

Q3 Social Sciences
P. Heintzman
{"title":"休闲和精神上的幸福:对鲍尔和范莱文的回应","authors":"P. Heintzman","doi":"10.1080/14927713.2021.1945945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Bouwer and Van Leeuwen after reviewing the research of three leisure scholars concluded that these scholars ‘conceptualisations are fundamentally related to psychological well-being and not spiritual well-being.’ Their review built upon Bouwer’s earlier chapter that examined whether leisure contributes to spiritual well-being. Bouwer concluded ‘the existent evidence for supporting the statement that leisure is a moderator for spiritual well-being is (conceptually) too weak to make a valid case for it.’ To advance scholarship on this topic and ultimately enhance our understanding of the relationship between leisure and spiritual well-being, the purpose of this paper is to respond to both Bouwer’s and Bouwer and Van Leeuwen’s research reviews. This paper concludes that most studies on leisure and spiritual well-being have discovered that leisure is associated with or contributes to spiritual well-being while a few studies have demonstrated that leisure can also detract from spiritual well-being.","PeriodicalId":18056,"journal":{"name":"Leisure/Loisir","volume":"62 2","pages":"147 - 165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14927713.2021.1945945","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leisure and spiritual well-being: A response to Bouwer and Van Leeuwen\",\"authors\":\"P. Heintzman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14927713.2021.1945945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Bouwer and Van Leeuwen after reviewing the research of three leisure scholars concluded that these scholars ‘conceptualisations are fundamentally related to psychological well-being and not spiritual well-being.’ Their review built upon Bouwer’s earlier chapter that examined whether leisure contributes to spiritual well-being. Bouwer concluded ‘the existent evidence for supporting the statement that leisure is a moderator for spiritual well-being is (conceptually) too weak to make a valid case for it.’ To advance scholarship on this topic and ultimately enhance our understanding of the relationship between leisure and spiritual well-being, the purpose of this paper is to respond to both Bouwer’s and Bouwer and Van Leeuwen’s research reviews. This paper concludes that most studies on leisure and spiritual well-being have discovered that leisure is associated with or contributes to spiritual well-being while a few studies have demonstrated that leisure can also detract from spiritual well-being.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leisure/Loisir\",\"volume\":\"62 2\",\"pages\":\"147 - 165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14927713.2021.1945945\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leisure/Loisir\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14927713.2021.1945945\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leisure/Loisir","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14927713.2021.1945945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Bouwer和Van Leeuwen在回顾了三位休闲学者的研究后得出结论,这些学者的概念从根本上与心理健康有关,而与精神健康无关。他们的评论建立在鲍尔前一章研究休闲是否有助于精神健康的基础上。鲍尔总结道:“支持休闲是精神健康调节因素这一说法的现有证据(在概念上)太弱,无法提出有效的理由。”“为了推进这一主题的学术研究,并最终增强我们对休闲与精神健康之间关系的理解,本文的目的是回应鲍尔、鲍尔和范·莱文的研究综述。”本文的结论是,大多数关于休闲和精神健康的研究都发现休闲与精神健康有关或有助于精神健康,但也有少数研究表明休闲也会损害精神健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leisure and spiritual well-being: A response to Bouwer and Van Leeuwen
ABSTRACT Bouwer and Van Leeuwen after reviewing the research of three leisure scholars concluded that these scholars ‘conceptualisations are fundamentally related to psychological well-being and not spiritual well-being.’ Their review built upon Bouwer’s earlier chapter that examined whether leisure contributes to spiritual well-being. Bouwer concluded ‘the existent evidence for supporting the statement that leisure is a moderator for spiritual well-being is (conceptually) too weak to make a valid case for it.’ To advance scholarship on this topic and ultimately enhance our understanding of the relationship between leisure and spiritual well-being, the purpose of this paper is to respond to both Bouwer’s and Bouwer and Van Leeuwen’s research reviews. This paper concludes that most studies on leisure and spiritual well-being have discovered that leisure is associated with or contributes to spiritual well-being while a few studies have demonstrated that leisure can also detract from spiritual well-being.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Leisure/Loisir
Leisure/Loisir Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信