{"title":"休闲和精神上的幸福:对鲍尔和范莱文的回应","authors":"P. Heintzman","doi":"10.1080/14927713.2021.1945945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Bouwer and Van Leeuwen after reviewing the research of three leisure scholars concluded that these scholars ‘conceptualisations are fundamentally related to psychological well-being and not spiritual well-being.’ Their review built upon Bouwer’s earlier chapter that examined whether leisure contributes to spiritual well-being. Bouwer concluded ‘the existent evidence for supporting the statement that leisure is a moderator for spiritual well-being is (conceptually) too weak to make a valid case for it.’ To advance scholarship on this topic and ultimately enhance our understanding of the relationship between leisure and spiritual well-being, the purpose of this paper is to respond to both Bouwer’s and Bouwer and Van Leeuwen’s research reviews. This paper concludes that most studies on leisure and spiritual well-being have discovered that leisure is associated with or contributes to spiritual well-being while a few studies have demonstrated that leisure can also detract from spiritual well-being.","PeriodicalId":18056,"journal":{"name":"Leisure/Loisir","volume":"62 2","pages":"147 - 165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14927713.2021.1945945","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leisure and spiritual well-being: A response to Bouwer and Van Leeuwen\",\"authors\":\"P. Heintzman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14927713.2021.1945945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Bouwer and Van Leeuwen after reviewing the research of three leisure scholars concluded that these scholars ‘conceptualisations are fundamentally related to psychological well-being and not spiritual well-being.’ Their review built upon Bouwer’s earlier chapter that examined whether leisure contributes to spiritual well-being. Bouwer concluded ‘the existent evidence for supporting the statement that leisure is a moderator for spiritual well-being is (conceptually) too weak to make a valid case for it.’ To advance scholarship on this topic and ultimately enhance our understanding of the relationship between leisure and spiritual well-being, the purpose of this paper is to respond to both Bouwer’s and Bouwer and Van Leeuwen’s research reviews. This paper concludes that most studies on leisure and spiritual well-being have discovered that leisure is associated with or contributes to spiritual well-being while a few studies have demonstrated that leisure can also detract from spiritual well-being.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leisure/Loisir\",\"volume\":\"62 2\",\"pages\":\"147 - 165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14927713.2021.1945945\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leisure/Loisir\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14927713.2021.1945945\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leisure/Loisir","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14927713.2021.1945945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Leisure and spiritual well-being: A response to Bouwer and Van Leeuwen
ABSTRACT Bouwer and Van Leeuwen after reviewing the research of three leisure scholars concluded that these scholars ‘conceptualisations are fundamentally related to psychological well-being and not spiritual well-being.’ Their review built upon Bouwer’s earlier chapter that examined whether leisure contributes to spiritual well-being. Bouwer concluded ‘the existent evidence for supporting the statement that leisure is a moderator for spiritual well-being is (conceptually) too weak to make a valid case for it.’ To advance scholarship on this topic and ultimately enhance our understanding of the relationship between leisure and spiritual well-being, the purpose of this paper is to respond to both Bouwer’s and Bouwer and Van Leeuwen’s research reviews. This paper concludes that most studies on leisure and spiritual well-being have discovered that leisure is associated with or contributes to spiritual well-being while a few studies have demonstrated that leisure can also detract from spiritual well-being.