医疗保险和私人保险在新医疗技术中的变化:药物洗脱支架的案例

E. E. Bayindir, P. K. Mandic
{"title":"医疗保险和私人保险在新医疗技术中的变化:药物洗脱支架的案例","authors":"E. E. Bayindir, P. K. Mandic","doi":"10.4172/2471-268X.1000114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance Little is known about the geographic and hospital variations of the new medical technologies in Medicare. Even less is known about these variations for the privately insured. Objective To examine geographic and hospital variations in the diffusion of drug eluting stents, comparing Medicare and privately insured populations. Design Retrospective analyses of discharges from the State Inpatient Databases for 11 states (2004–2005) supplemented with data on hospital characteristics from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey. Setting/participants Study sample included discharges with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures that involved a cardiac stent. Exposure Insurance type: Medicare versus private insurance. Main outcome Use of a drug eluting stent during the PCI was our outcome variable. We estimated linear probability models at the discharge level that related our outcome variable to patient and hospital characteristics separately for Medicare and private insurance. To examine variations across hospital referral regions (HRRs) and across hospitals, our models included HRR and hospital indicators respectively. Results Our analysis included 390,649 records (237,991 Medicare, 152,658 private insurance). We found large HRR variations in the use of drug eluting stents in 2004 for both payer types, the year after drug eluting stents were approved (adjusted CoV: 0.35 (Medicare); 0.24 (Private Insurance)). We also found large hospital variations in 2004 (adjusted CoV: 0.32 (Medicare); 0.29 (Private Insurance)). Between 2004 and 2005, adjusted HRR and hospital variations decreased across both payer types, suggesting that practice styles converged as the drug eluting stents diffused and became more common. Finally, adjusted drug eluting stent rates were highly correlated both at the HRR and hospital level across payer types. Conclusion Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that private insurance closely follows the lead of Medicare in terms of medical technology coverage and reimbursement.","PeriodicalId":91490,"journal":{"name":"Health economics & outcome research : Open access","volume":"9 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medicare and Private Insurance Variations in New Medical Technology: The Case of Drug Eluting Stents\",\"authors\":\"E. E. Bayindir, P. K. Mandic\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2471-268X.1000114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Importance Little is known about the geographic and hospital variations of the new medical technologies in Medicare. Even less is known about these variations for the privately insured. Objective To examine geographic and hospital variations in the diffusion of drug eluting stents, comparing Medicare and privately insured populations. Design Retrospective analyses of discharges from the State Inpatient Databases for 11 states (2004–2005) supplemented with data on hospital characteristics from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey. Setting/participants Study sample included discharges with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures that involved a cardiac stent. Exposure Insurance type: Medicare versus private insurance. Main outcome Use of a drug eluting stent during the PCI was our outcome variable. We estimated linear probability models at the discharge level that related our outcome variable to patient and hospital characteristics separately for Medicare and private insurance. To examine variations across hospital referral regions (HRRs) and across hospitals, our models included HRR and hospital indicators respectively. Results Our analysis included 390,649 records (237,991 Medicare, 152,658 private insurance). We found large HRR variations in the use of drug eluting stents in 2004 for both payer types, the year after drug eluting stents were approved (adjusted CoV: 0.35 (Medicare); 0.24 (Private Insurance)). We also found large hospital variations in 2004 (adjusted CoV: 0.32 (Medicare); 0.29 (Private Insurance)). Between 2004 and 2005, adjusted HRR and hospital variations decreased across both payer types, suggesting that practice styles converged as the drug eluting stents diffused and became more common. Finally, adjusted drug eluting stent rates were highly correlated both at the HRR and hospital level across payer types. Conclusion Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that private insurance closely follows the lead of Medicare in terms of medical technology coverage and reimbursement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health economics & outcome research : Open access\",\"volume\":\"9 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health economics & outcome research : Open access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2471-268X.1000114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health economics & outcome research : Open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2471-268X.1000114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

人们对医疗保险中新医疗技术的地理和医院变化知之甚少。对于私人保险的这些变化,我们所知的就更少了。目的探讨药物洗脱支架扩散的地理和医院差异,比较医疗保险和私人保险人群。设计回顾性分析美国11个州(2004-2005年)住院病人数据库中的出院情况,并辅以美国医院协会年度调查的医院特征数据。研究对象包括经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)并植入心脏支架的出院患者。风险保险类型:医疗保险与私人保险。主要结局:PCI期间药物洗脱支架的使用是我们的结局变量。我们估计了出院水平的线性概率模型,该模型将我们的结果变量与医疗保险和私人保险的患者和医院特征分开。为了检查医院转诊区域(HRR)和医院之间的差异,我们的模型分别纳入了HRR和医院指标。结果我们分析了390,649条记录(其中医疗保险237,991条,私人保险152,658条)。我们发现,在药物洗脱支架获批后的2004年,两种支付款人使用药物洗脱支架的HRR差异很大(调整后的CoV: 0.35(医疗保险);0.24(私人保险))。我们还发现2004年各医院的差异很大(调整后的CoV: 0.32(医疗保险);0.29(私人保险))。2004年至2005年间,两种支付者类型的调整后HRR和医院变化都有所下降,这表明随着药物洗脱支架的扩散和普及,实践风格趋于一致。最后,调整后的药物洗脱支架率在不同付款人类型的HRR和医院水平上都高度相关。结论民营保险在医疗技术覆盖和报销方面与医疗保险密切相关的假设是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medicare and Private Insurance Variations in New Medical Technology: The Case of Drug Eluting Stents
Importance Little is known about the geographic and hospital variations of the new medical technologies in Medicare. Even less is known about these variations for the privately insured. Objective To examine geographic and hospital variations in the diffusion of drug eluting stents, comparing Medicare and privately insured populations. Design Retrospective analyses of discharges from the State Inpatient Databases for 11 states (2004–2005) supplemented with data on hospital characteristics from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey. Setting/participants Study sample included discharges with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures that involved a cardiac stent. Exposure Insurance type: Medicare versus private insurance. Main outcome Use of a drug eluting stent during the PCI was our outcome variable. We estimated linear probability models at the discharge level that related our outcome variable to patient and hospital characteristics separately for Medicare and private insurance. To examine variations across hospital referral regions (HRRs) and across hospitals, our models included HRR and hospital indicators respectively. Results Our analysis included 390,649 records (237,991 Medicare, 152,658 private insurance). We found large HRR variations in the use of drug eluting stents in 2004 for both payer types, the year after drug eluting stents were approved (adjusted CoV: 0.35 (Medicare); 0.24 (Private Insurance)). We also found large hospital variations in 2004 (adjusted CoV: 0.32 (Medicare); 0.29 (Private Insurance)). Between 2004 and 2005, adjusted HRR and hospital variations decreased across both payer types, suggesting that practice styles converged as the drug eluting stents diffused and became more common. Finally, adjusted drug eluting stent rates were highly correlated both at the HRR and hospital level across payer types. Conclusion Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that private insurance closely follows the lead of Medicare in terms of medical technology coverage and reimbursement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信