{"title":"多元主义与积累的生态体制","authors":"Federico Luisetti","doi":"10.30671/nordia.116149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jason W. Moore is a fierce polemicist and his indictment of the decolonial project associated with the Latin American “Modernity/Coloniality/Decoloniality” collective confirms his verve. His commentary on pluriversalism cannot be more straightforward. It thus deserves close reading: decolonial thinking has constructed an abstract “metaphysics of coloniality” that misses the concrete origins of the modern world-system; its romantic cult of indigenous struggles lacks the internationalism of radical emancipatory politics; “pluriversalism and its cognates” are incompatible with a history of capitalism centred on the material process of accumulation, class formation, and the plundering of nature; decolonial “linguistic acrobatics” promises war against Western knowledge, but in reality it reifies Europe and reproduces bourgeois ahistorical universalism. history of","PeriodicalId":34559,"journal":{"name":"Nordia Geographical Publications","volume":"151 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pluriversalism and the Ecological Regime of Accumulation\",\"authors\":\"Federico Luisetti\",\"doi\":\"10.30671/nordia.116149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Jason W. Moore is a fierce polemicist and his indictment of the decolonial project associated with the Latin American “Modernity/Coloniality/Decoloniality” collective confirms his verve. His commentary on pluriversalism cannot be more straightforward. It thus deserves close reading: decolonial thinking has constructed an abstract “metaphysics of coloniality” that misses the concrete origins of the modern world-system; its romantic cult of indigenous struggles lacks the internationalism of radical emancipatory politics; “pluriversalism and its cognates” are incompatible with a history of capitalism centred on the material process of accumulation, class formation, and the plundering of nature; decolonial “linguistic acrobatics” promises war against Western knowledge, but in reality it reifies Europe and reproduces bourgeois ahistorical universalism. history of\",\"PeriodicalId\":34559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordia Geographical Publications\",\"volume\":\"151 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordia Geographical Publications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30671/nordia.116149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordia Geographical Publications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30671/nordia.116149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
杰森·w·摩尔(Jason W. Moore)是一位激烈的辩论家,他对与拉丁美洲“现代性/殖民性/非殖民化”集体相关的非殖民化项目的控诉证实了他的气魄。他对多元主义的评论再直接不过了。因此,它值得仔细阅读:非殖民化思想构建了一种抽象的“殖民形而上学”,忽略了现代世界体系的具体起源;它对土著斗争的浪漫崇拜缺乏激进解放政治的国际主义;“多元主义及其同源”与以积累、阶级形成和掠夺自然的物质过程为中心的资本主义历史是不相容的;非殖民化的“语言杂技”承诺向西方知识宣战,但实际上它将欧洲物化,再现了资产阶级的非历史普遍主义。的历史
Pluriversalism and the Ecological Regime of Accumulation
Jason W. Moore is a fierce polemicist and his indictment of the decolonial project associated with the Latin American “Modernity/Coloniality/Decoloniality” collective confirms his verve. His commentary on pluriversalism cannot be more straightforward. It thus deserves close reading: decolonial thinking has constructed an abstract “metaphysics of coloniality” that misses the concrete origins of the modern world-system; its romantic cult of indigenous struggles lacks the internationalism of radical emancipatory politics; “pluriversalism and its cognates” are incompatible with a history of capitalism centred on the material process of accumulation, class formation, and the plundering of nature; decolonial “linguistic acrobatics” promises war against Western knowledge, but in reality it reifies Europe and reproduces bourgeois ahistorical universalism. history of