胸部区域的左/右判断任务,第2部分:在胸部和肩部区域的表现中心理操纵的证据

IF 1 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Benjamin S. Boyd, Betty J. Smoot, R. Nee
{"title":"胸部区域的左/右判断任务,第2部分:在胸部和肩部区域的表现中心理操纵的证据","authors":"Benjamin S. Boyd, Betty J. Smoot, R. Nee","doi":"10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Left/right judgment tasks (LRJTs) theoretically require mental maneuvering one's body to reorient and match a viewed image. Mental maneuvering strategies may include spatial transformation and/or motor imagery. LRJT performance outcomes do not inherently distinguish between mental maneuvering strategies used to accomplish the task. Orientation difference (OD) describes the difference between the observer's position and the body orientation within an image. Evaluating whether LRJTs elicit mental maneuvering has traditionally been based upon the premise of an inverse linear relationship between LRJT performance and OD (“exact match” hypothesis). If true, larger ODs should lead to slower LRJT performance. Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between OD and chest and shoulder LRJT performance. Design: Observational, cohort study. Method: Associations between OD and LRJT accuracy and response time were evaluated in women with and without a history of unilateral breast cancer. Images from chest and shoulder LRJTs were categorized by various OD methods that assume more efficient (shortest path: OD(shortest path)) or less efficient (rotation by dimensions: (OD(rotation by dimensions)) participant mental maneuvering. Shoulder analyses also incorporated the angle between the arm and trunk (OD(shortest path + arm angle) and OD(rotation by dimensions + arm angle)). Results: Chest LRJT response time was most associated with OD(shortest path) (R2 = 0.510). Shoulder LRJT response time was most associated with OD(rotation by dimensions + arm angle) (R2 = 0.807). Both relationships were nonlinear. Discussion: Strong relationships between chest and shoulder LRJT and different OD models suggest these are discrete tasks that elicit mental maneuvering. The nonlinear nature of these relationships does not support the “exact match” hypothesis. Factors that can explain the remaining variance in LRJT performance need to be identified.","PeriodicalId":54153,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Oncology","volume":"10 3","pages":"71 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left/Right Judgment Task for the Chest Region, Part 2: Evidence for Mental Maneuvering in Performance During Chest Versus Shoulder Regions\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin S. Boyd, Betty J. Smoot, R. Nee\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Left/right judgment tasks (LRJTs) theoretically require mental maneuvering one's body to reorient and match a viewed image. Mental maneuvering strategies may include spatial transformation and/or motor imagery. LRJT performance outcomes do not inherently distinguish between mental maneuvering strategies used to accomplish the task. Orientation difference (OD) describes the difference between the observer's position and the body orientation within an image. Evaluating whether LRJTs elicit mental maneuvering has traditionally been based upon the premise of an inverse linear relationship between LRJT performance and OD (“exact match” hypothesis). If true, larger ODs should lead to slower LRJT performance. Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between OD and chest and shoulder LRJT performance. Design: Observational, cohort study. Method: Associations between OD and LRJT accuracy and response time were evaluated in women with and without a history of unilateral breast cancer. Images from chest and shoulder LRJTs were categorized by various OD methods that assume more efficient (shortest path: OD(shortest path)) or less efficient (rotation by dimensions: (OD(rotation by dimensions)) participant mental maneuvering. Shoulder analyses also incorporated the angle between the arm and trunk (OD(shortest path + arm angle) and OD(rotation by dimensions + arm angle)). Results: Chest LRJT response time was most associated with OD(shortest path) (R2 = 0.510). Shoulder LRJT response time was most associated with OD(rotation by dimensions + arm angle) (R2 = 0.807). Both relationships were nonlinear. Discussion: Strong relationships between chest and shoulder LRJT and different OD models suggest these are discrete tasks that elicit mental maneuvering. The nonlinear nature of these relationships does not support the “exact match” hypothesis. Factors that can explain the remaining variance in LRJT performance need to be identified.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rehabilitation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"71 - 81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rehabilitation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:从理论上讲,左/右判断任务(LRJTs)需要心理操纵一个人的身体来重新定位和匹配所看到的图像。心理操纵策略可能包括空间转换和/或运动意象。LRJT绩效结果本身并不区分用于完成任务的心理操作策略。方向差(OD)描述了图像中观察者的位置和身体方向之间的差异。传统上,评估LRJT是否会引发心理操纵的前提是LRJT绩效与OD之间存在反线性关系(“精确匹配”假设)。如果为真,较大的od将导致较慢的LRJT性能。目的:探讨外径与胸肩LRJT功能的关系。设计:观察性队列研究。方法:在有和没有单侧乳腺癌病史的女性中评估OD和LRJT准确性和反应时间之间的关系。来自胸部和肩部lrjt的图像通过各种OD方法进行分类,这些方法假设更有效(最短路径:OD(最短路径))或更低效(按维度旋转:OD(按维度旋转))参与者的心理操作。肩部分析还包括手臂和躯干之间的角度(OD(最短路径+手臂角度)和OD(尺寸旋转+手臂角度))。结果:胸部LRJT反应时间与OD(最短路径)相关性最大(R2 = 0.510)。肩部LRJT反应时间与OD(尺寸旋转+手臂角度)相关性最大(R2 = 0.807)。这两种关系都是非线性的。讨论:胸部和肩部LRJT与不同OD模型之间的密切关系表明,这些是引起心理操作的离散任务。这些关系的非线性性质不支持“精确匹配”假说。需要确定能够解释LRJT性能中剩余差异的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Left/Right Judgment Task for the Chest Region, Part 2: Evidence for Mental Maneuvering in Performance During Chest Versus Shoulder Regions
Background: Left/right judgment tasks (LRJTs) theoretically require mental maneuvering one's body to reorient and match a viewed image. Mental maneuvering strategies may include spatial transformation and/or motor imagery. LRJT performance outcomes do not inherently distinguish between mental maneuvering strategies used to accomplish the task. Orientation difference (OD) describes the difference between the observer's position and the body orientation within an image. Evaluating whether LRJTs elicit mental maneuvering has traditionally been based upon the premise of an inverse linear relationship between LRJT performance and OD (“exact match” hypothesis). If true, larger ODs should lead to slower LRJT performance. Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between OD and chest and shoulder LRJT performance. Design: Observational, cohort study. Method: Associations between OD and LRJT accuracy and response time were evaluated in women with and without a history of unilateral breast cancer. Images from chest and shoulder LRJTs were categorized by various OD methods that assume more efficient (shortest path: OD(shortest path)) or less efficient (rotation by dimensions: (OD(rotation by dimensions)) participant mental maneuvering. Shoulder analyses also incorporated the angle between the arm and trunk (OD(shortest path + arm angle) and OD(rotation by dimensions + arm angle)). Results: Chest LRJT response time was most associated with OD(shortest path) (R2 = 0.510). Shoulder LRJT response time was most associated with OD(rotation by dimensions + arm angle) (R2 = 0.807). Both relationships were nonlinear. Discussion: Strong relationships between chest and shoulder LRJT and different OD models suggest these are discrete tasks that elicit mental maneuvering. The nonlinear nature of these relationships does not support the “exact match” hypothesis. Factors that can explain the remaining variance in LRJT performance need to be identified.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
22.20%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信