神智论者和约翰逊博士

IF 0.3 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
M. Witty
{"title":"神智论者和约翰逊博士","authors":"M. Witty","doi":"10.1515/lex-2020-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract His admirers assert that the first English dictionary was Johnson’s but this is denied by antagonists who cite late medieval and early Renaissance lexicographers such as Thomas Elyot, Thomas Cooper and John Florio. The admirers emphasize Johnson’s merit above earlier authors and assert innovations to the form. This paper shows both views are limited and lexicography has a much greater antiquity seen in Athenaeus and earlier. All these works, which were composed over thousands of years, did not come from Evolution where Athenaeus is a common ancestor. Instead they are products of literary Spontaneous Generation, showing that Homo est animal grammaticum.","PeriodicalId":29876,"journal":{"name":"LEXICOGRAPHICA","volume":"41 8","pages":"311 - 324"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/lex-2020-0016","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Deipnosophists and Dr Johnson\",\"authors\":\"M. Witty\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/lex-2020-0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract His admirers assert that the first English dictionary was Johnson’s but this is denied by antagonists who cite late medieval and early Renaissance lexicographers such as Thomas Elyot, Thomas Cooper and John Florio. The admirers emphasize Johnson’s merit above earlier authors and assert innovations to the form. This paper shows both views are limited and lexicography has a much greater antiquity seen in Athenaeus and earlier. All these works, which were composed over thousands of years, did not come from Evolution where Athenaeus is a common ancestor. Instead they are products of literary Spontaneous Generation, showing that Homo est animal grammaticum.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LEXICOGRAPHICA\",\"volume\":\"41 8\",\"pages\":\"311 - 324\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/lex-2020-0016\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LEXICOGRAPHICA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/lex-2020-0016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LEXICOGRAPHICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/lex-2020-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

他的崇拜者断言第一本英语词典是约翰逊的,但反对者否认了这一点,他们引用了中世纪晚期和文艺复兴早期的词典编纂者,如托马斯·埃利奥特、托马斯·库珀和约翰·弗洛里奥。崇拜者们强调约翰逊比早期作家更有价值,并主张对形式进行创新。这篇论文表明,这两种观点都是有限的,词典编纂在雅典娜和更早的时候就有了更大的历史。所有这些作品都是经过数千年的创作,并不是来自雅典娜是共同祖先的进化论。相反,它们是文学自发产生的产物,表明人是动物语法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Deipnosophists and Dr Johnson
Abstract His admirers assert that the first English dictionary was Johnson’s but this is denied by antagonists who cite late medieval and early Renaissance lexicographers such as Thomas Elyot, Thomas Cooper and John Florio. The admirers emphasize Johnson’s merit above earlier authors and assert innovations to the form. This paper shows both views are limited and lexicography has a much greater antiquity seen in Athenaeus and earlier. All these works, which were composed over thousands of years, did not come from Evolution where Athenaeus is a common ancestor. Instead they are products of literary Spontaneous Generation, showing that Homo est animal grammaticum.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
LEXICOGRAPHICA
LEXICOGRAPHICA Multiple-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信