Comparison of student perception and performance between case-based learning and lecture-based learning in a clinical laboratory immunology course

Abstract Background: Case-based learning (CBL), an educational method of problem-based learning, provides students with a venue to relate content learned in the classroom to performance in professional practice. This study compared CBL in the teaching of a clinical laboratory immunology (CLI) course to lecture-based learning (LBL), and evaluated the effect on students regarding the CBL. Methods: Data were collected from senior students (n=85; 46% males, 54% females) at Lanzhou University in China. The students were divided into two groups, one group was offered CBL, while the other LBL as a teaching instrument. After intervention, perceptions of both the groups about their respective teaching method were evaluated using questionnaires, the resulting scores were compared to those obtained in the LBL group. Results: The CBL group showed significantly better scores in course examination (p<0.05) as compared to the LBL group. Seventy-seven (90.6%) students in the CBL group opined that CBL improved their learning and clinical problem-solving skills. CBL also provided them with better understanding (90.6%) and preparation for examinations (90.6%). CBL group improved markedly in comparison to the LBL group with regard to learning motivation (p=0.040), clinical reasoning ability (p=0.023) and clinical problem-solving ability (p=0.022). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that CBL is a more effective teaching strategy as compared to LBL in a CLI course. Consequently, the implementation of CBL in teaching a CLI course helps students to improve their learning motivation, problem solving abilities and mastery of knowledge.