颗粒土开挖周围的地面运动:关于本构假设对有限元预测的影响的几点意见

Gioacchino Viggiani, Claudio Tamagnini
{"title":"颗粒土开挖周围的地面运动:关于本构假设对有限元预测的影响的几点意见","authors":"Gioacchino Viggiani,&nbsp;Claudio Tamagnini","doi":"10.1002/1099-1484(200007)5:5<399::AID-CFM101>3.0.CO;2-R","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Two different approaches for modelling soil non-linearity (hardening plasticity and hypoplasticity) are compared with reference to the analysis of soil–structure interaction in an excavation in dense dry sand, supported by a propped diaphragm wall. The analysis focuses on the prediction of wall and soil movements. A commercial FE code has been used for the elastoplastic analyses, in order to assess the performance of a readily available design tool in current geotechnical engineering practice as compared to the predictions of a more advanced research tool. Although obtained for an idealized scheme, the results allow a number of more general conclusions to be drawn on the influence of the constitutive assumptions. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":100899,"journal":{"name":"Mechanics of Cohesive-frictional Materials","volume":"5 5","pages":"399-423"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/1099-1484(200007)5:5<399::AID-CFM101>3.0.CO;2-R","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ground movements around excavations in granular soils: a few remarks on the influence of the constitutive assumptions on FE predictions\",\"authors\":\"Gioacchino Viggiani,&nbsp;Claudio Tamagnini\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/1099-1484(200007)5:5<399::AID-CFM101>3.0.CO;2-R\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Two different approaches for modelling soil non-linearity (hardening plasticity and hypoplasticity) are compared with reference to the analysis of soil–structure interaction in an excavation in dense dry sand, supported by a propped diaphragm wall. The analysis focuses on the prediction of wall and soil movements. A commercial FE code has been used for the elastoplastic analyses, in order to assess the performance of a readily available design tool in current geotechnical engineering practice as compared to the predictions of a more advanced research tool. Although obtained for an idealized scheme, the results allow a number of more general conclusions to be drawn on the influence of the constitutive assumptions. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mechanics of Cohesive-frictional Materials\",\"volume\":\"5 5\",\"pages\":\"399-423\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/1099-1484(200007)5:5<399::AID-CFM101>3.0.CO;2-R\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mechanics of Cohesive-frictional Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1099-1484%28200007%295%3A5%3C399%3A%3AAID-CFM101%3E3.0.CO%3B2-R\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mechanics of Cohesive-frictional Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1099-1484%28200007%295%3A5%3C399%3A%3AAID-CFM101%3E3.0.CO%3B2-R","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

对比了两种不同的土壤非线性建模方法(硬化塑性和低塑性),并参考了由支撑地下连续墙支撑的密实干砂开挖中的土壤-结构相互作用分析。分析的重点是墙和土壤运动的预测。商业有限元代码已用于弹塑性分析,以评估当前岩土工程实践中现成的设计工具与更先进的研究工具的预测相比的性能。尽管是针对理想化方案获得的,但这些结果允许就本构假设的影响得出一些更一般的结论。版权所有©2000 John Wiley&;有限公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ground movements around excavations in granular soils: a few remarks on the influence of the constitutive assumptions on FE predictions

Two different approaches for modelling soil non-linearity (hardening plasticity and hypoplasticity) are compared with reference to the analysis of soil–structure interaction in an excavation in dense dry sand, supported by a propped diaphragm wall. The analysis focuses on the prediction of wall and soil movements. A commercial FE code has been used for the elastoplastic analyses, in order to assess the performance of a readily available design tool in current geotechnical engineering practice as compared to the predictions of a more advanced research tool. Although obtained for an idealized scheme, the results allow a number of more general conclusions to be drawn on the influence of the constitutive assumptions. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信