经济匮乏通过压力与执行功能的多个方面间接相关,而联想的强度取决于儿童时期的贫困

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Jessica O'Neill, Claire E. Cameron, Lucia A. Leone, Heather Orom
{"title":"经济匮乏通过压力与执行功能的多个方面间接相关,而联想的强度取决于儿童时期的贫困","authors":"Jessica O'Neill,&nbsp;Claire E. Cameron,&nbsp;Lucia A. Leone,&nbsp;Heather Orom","doi":"10.1002/jts5.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Financial scarcity, or having insufficient financial resources to meet needs, directly impairs multiple aspects of executive function (EF). Financial scarcity is also stressful and stress impairs EF, however, whether stress mediates the effect of scarcity on EF, and whether these associations vary by either the aspect of EF being measured, or self-reported developmental history of poverty, is not known. Data were collected from a cross-sectional sample of 249 female Amazon Mechanical Turk workers who self-reported their stress using Cohen's perceived stress scale and their EF using the 75-item Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function. They also reported their history of poverty during childhood at ages 0–6, 6–12, and 12–18 years. We measured current financial scarcity using questions that assess five aspects of perceived inability to meet one's basic needs. We used path analysis to test our primary hypothesis that higher financial scarcity is associated with higher stress and more challenges with components of EF overall. Specifically, we tested whether there are indirect effects from scarcity to three specific aspects of EF (behavioral regulation, emotion regulation, and meta-cognition) through stress. Second, we tested whether the model fit and magnitude of direct effects varied by childhood poverty history. Results supported hypotheses that stress would be negatively associated with multiple EF aspects (behavioral regulation and emotional regulation); and associations were stronger for women reporting early poverty-related experiences. Interventions designed to alleviate financial scarcity, and address stress management, may be considered as potential ways to support EF for people with scarce financial resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"5 4","pages":"464-477"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financial scarcity is indirectly related to multiple aspects of executive function through stress and the strength of association depends on childhood poverty\",\"authors\":\"Jessica O'Neill,&nbsp;Claire E. Cameron,&nbsp;Lucia A. Leone,&nbsp;Heather Orom\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jts5.111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Financial scarcity, or having insufficient financial resources to meet needs, directly impairs multiple aspects of executive function (EF). Financial scarcity is also stressful and stress impairs EF, however, whether stress mediates the effect of scarcity on EF, and whether these associations vary by either the aspect of EF being measured, or self-reported developmental history of poverty, is not known. Data were collected from a cross-sectional sample of 249 female Amazon Mechanical Turk workers who self-reported their stress using Cohen's perceived stress scale and their EF using the 75-item Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function. They also reported their history of poverty during childhood at ages 0–6, 6–12, and 12–18 years. We measured current financial scarcity using questions that assess five aspects of perceived inability to meet one's basic needs. We used path analysis to test our primary hypothesis that higher financial scarcity is associated with higher stress and more challenges with components of EF overall. Specifically, we tested whether there are indirect effects from scarcity to three specific aspects of EF (behavioral regulation, emotion regulation, and meta-cognition) through stress. Second, we tested whether the model fit and magnitude of direct effects varied by childhood poverty history. Results supported hypotheses that stress would be negatively associated with multiple EF aspects (behavioral regulation and emotional regulation); and associations were stronger for women reporting early poverty-related experiences. Interventions designed to alleviate financial scarcity, and address stress management, may be considered as potential ways to support EF for people with scarce financial resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"464-477\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jts5.111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jts5.111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

财政短缺,或者没有足够的财政资源来满足需求,直接损害了执行职能的多个方面。经济匮乏也会带来压力,压力会损害EF,然而,压力是否会介导匮乏对EF的影响,以及这些关联是否因衡量EF的方面或自我报告的贫困发展史而不同,目前尚不清楚。数据是从249名亚马逊机械土耳其公司女性员工的横断面样本中收集的,她们使用科恩感知压力量表自我报告自己的压力,并使用75项执行功能行为评定量表进行EF。他们还报告了他们在0–6岁、6–12岁和12–18岁时的贫困史。我们通过评估无法满足基本需求的五个方面的问题来衡量当前的资金短缺。我们使用路径分析来检验我们的主要假设,即更高的资金稀缺性与更高的压力和EF组成部分的更多挑战有关。具体来说,我们测试了稀缺性是否通过压力对EF的三个特定方面(行为调节、情绪调节和元认知)产生间接影响。其次,我们测试了该模型的拟合度和直接影响的大小是否因儿童贫困史而异。结果支持了压力与多个EF方面(行为调节和情绪调节)负相关的假设;报告早期与贫困有关经历的妇女的协会更加强大。旨在缓解资金短缺和解决压力管理问题的干预措施,可以被认为是为资金短缺的人支持EF的潜在方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Financial scarcity is indirectly related to multiple aspects of executive function through stress and the strength of association depends on childhood poverty

Financial scarcity, or having insufficient financial resources to meet needs, directly impairs multiple aspects of executive function (EF). Financial scarcity is also stressful and stress impairs EF, however, whether stress mediates the effect of scarcity on EF, and whether these associations vary by either the aspect of EF being measured, or self-reported developmental history of poverty, is not known. Data were collected from a cross-sectional sample of 249 female Amazon Mechanical Turk workers who self-reported their stress using Cohen's perceived stress scale and their EF using the 75-item Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function. They also reported their history of poverty during childhood at ages 0–6, 6–12, and 12–18 years. We measured current financial scarcity using questions that assess five aspects of perceived inability to meet one's basic needs. We used path analysis to test our primary hypothesis that higher financial scarcity is associated with higher stress and more challenges with components of EF overall. Specifically, we tested whether there are indirect effects from scarcity to three specific aspects of EF (behavioral regulation, emotion regulation, and meta-cognition) through stress. Second, we tested whether the model fit and magnitude of direct effects varied by childhood poverty history. Results supported hypotheses that stress would be negatively associated with multiple EF aspects (behavioral regulation and emotional regulation); and associations were stronger for women reporting early poverty-related experiences. Interventions designed to alleviate financial scarcity, and address stress management, may be considered as potential ways to support EF for people with scarce financial resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信