刺激配对和陈述目标信息对个体刻板印象相关评价具有同等影响

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Rachel S. Rubinstein, Lee Jussim
{"title":"刺激配对和陈述目标信息对个体刻板印象相关评价具有同等影响","authors":"Rachel S. Rubinstein,&nbsp;Lee Jussim","doi":"10.1002/jts5.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>The present research tested a series of theoretically derived competing hypotheses regarding the extent to which different ways of learning about others influence stereotype-relevant impression formation and reliance on stereotypes in stereotype-relevant target evaluations. First, we examined the extent to which stimulus pairing or statement information about novel White (Study 1) and Black (Study 2) targets' intelligence influenced implicit and explicit impressions of the targets' competence. In both studies, we found that the two modes of information presentation produced equal effects on impression formation at both the implicit and the explicit levels. In a third study, we compared the effectiveness of stimulus pairing and statement information at reducing or eliminating the influence of stereotypes on implicit and explicit person perception. We found that stereotyping in implicit person perception was completely eliminated by both types of information, but found no evidence of explicit stereotype bias even in the absence of individuating information. Together, the results of the three studies suggest that stimulus pairing and statement target information are equally influential in the formation of stereotype-relevant impressions of novel targets and in eliminating the influence of stereotypes on stereotype-relevant target evaluations. These findings provide support for propositional models of implicit evaluations and for dual-process theories allowing for interaction between different learning systems, but do not support dual-systems theories.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Open Practices</h3>\n \n <p>\n \n </p>\n \n <p>Data and materials for all three studies are available at https://osf.io/pd2ht/. Preregistration for Study 2 is available at https://osf.io/mw38p/register/5771ca429ad5a1020de2872e and preregistration for Study 3 is available at https://osf.io/ymebw/register/5771ca429ad5a1020de2872e.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"3 4","pages":"231-249"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jts5.53","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stimulus pairing and statement target information have equal effects on stereotype-relevant evaluations of individuals\",\"authors\":\"Rachel S. Rubinstein,&nbsp;Lee Jussim\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jts5.53\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>The present research tested a series of theoretically derived competing hypotheses regarding the extent to which different ways of learning about others influence stereotype-relevant impression formation and reliance on stereotypes in stereotype-relevant target evaluations. First, we examined the extent to which stimulus pairing or statement information about novel White (Study 1) and Black (Study 2) targets' intelligence influenced implicit and explicit impressions of the targets' competence. In both studies, we found that the two modes of information presentation produced equal effects on impression formation at both the implicit and the explicit levels. In a third study, we compared the effectiveness of stimulus pairing and statement information at reducing or eliminating the influence of stereotypes on implicit and explicit person perception. We found that stereotyping in implicit person perception was completely eliminated by both types of information, but found no evidence of explicit stereotype bias even in the absence of individuating information. Together, the results of the three studies suggest that stimulus pairing and statement target information are equally influential in the formation of stereotype-relevant impressions of novel targets and in eliminating the influence of stereotypes on stereotype-relevant target evaluations. These findings provide support for propositional models of implicit evaluations and for dual-process theories allowing for interaction between different learning systems, but do not support dual-systems theories.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Open Practices</h3>\\n \\n <p>\\n \\n </p>\\n \\n <p>Data and materials for all three studies are available at https://osf.io/pd2ht/. Preregistration for Study 2 is available at https://osf.io/mw38p/register/5771ca429ad5a1020de2872e and preregistration for Study 3 is available at https://osf.io/ymebw/register/5771ca429ad5a1020de2872e.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"231-249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jts5.53\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jts5.53\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jts5.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究测试了一系列理论推导的相互竞争的假设,即学习他人的不同方式在多大程度上影响刻板印象相关的印象形成,以及在刻板印象相关目标评估中对刻板印象的依赖。首先,我们考察了关于新白人(研究1)和黑人(研究2)目标智力的刺激配对或陈述信息对目标能力的内隐和外显印象的影响程度。在这两项研究中,我们发现这两种信息呈现模式在内隐和外显层面上对印象形成的影响是相等的。在第三项研究中,我们比较了刺激配对和陈述信息在减少或消除刻板印象对内隐和外显个人感知的影响方面的有效性。我们发现,两种类型的信息都完全消除了内隐人感知中的刻板印象,但即使在缺乏个性化信息的情况下,也没有发现明确的刻板印象偏见的证据。三项研究的结果表明,刺激配对和陈述目标信息在形成对新目标的刻板印象和消除刻板印象对刻板印象相关目标评价的影响方面同样具有影响力。这些发现为内隐评价的命题模型和允许不同学习系统之间交互的双过程理论提供了支持,但不支持双系统理论。所有三项研究的开放实践数据和材料可在https://osf.io/pd2ht/.研究2的预注册可在https://osf.io/mw38p/register/5771ca429ad5a1020de2872e研究3的预注册可在https://osf.io/ymebw/register/5771ca429ad5a1020de2872e.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stimulus pairing and statement target information have equal effects on stereotype-relevant evaluations of individuals

The present research tested a series of theoretically derived competing hypotheses regarding the extent to which different ways of learning about others influence stereotype-relevant impression formation and reliance on stereotypes in stereotype-relevant target evaluations. First, we examined the extent to which stimulus pairing or statement information about novel White (Study 1) and Black (Study 2) targets' intelligence influenced implicit and explicit impressions of the targets' competence. In both studies, we found that the two modes of information presentation produced equal effects on impression formation at both the implicit and the explicit levels. In a third study, we compared the effectiveness of stimulus pairing and statement information at reducing or eliminating the influence of stereotypes on implicit and explicit person perception. We found that stereotyping in implicit person perception was completely eliminated by both types of information, but found no evidence of explicit stereotype bias even in the absence of individuating information. Together, the results of the three studies suggest that stimulus pairing and statement target information are equally influential in the formation of stereotype-relevant impressions of novel targets and in eliminating the influence of stereotypes on stereotype-relevant target evaluations. These findings provide support for propositional models of implicit evaluations and for dual-process theories allowing for interaction between different learning systems, but do not support dual-systems theories.

Open Practices

Data and materials for all three studies are available at https://osf.io/pd2ht/. Preregistration for Study 2 is available at https://osf.io/mw38p/register/5771ca429ad5a1020de2872e and preregistration for Study 3 is available at https://osf.io/ymebw/register/5771ca429ad5a1020de2872e.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信