钢筋塑性粘结模型的验证

James V. Cox, Leonard R. Herrmann
{"title":"钢筋塑性粘结模型的验证","authors":"James V. Cox,&nbsp;Leonard R. Herrmann","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(199907)4:4<361::AID-CFM66>3.0.CO;2-F","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The validation of a plasticity model for bond between ribbed, steel bars and concrete is discussed. The model relates local slip and radial dilation to bond stress and radial confinement stress, i.e. it provides an interface characterization of the behaviour of a finite-thickness region around the bar—the <i>bond zone</i>. The validation study considers experimental results from six independent investigations. The specimens are all pull-out specimens but differ significantly in size and configuration. Models for each specimen, based on a single bond model calibration, reproduce the experimental results with acceptable accuracy. The response over the full range of slip and the mode of failure are examined. Some of the model's strengths, weaknesses, and potential improvements are discussed. For the most part, the models predicts the experimental bond strength within 20 per cent and exhibits the potential to predict both pull-out and splitting failures. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":100899,"journal":{"name":"Mechanics of Cohesive-frictional Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(199907)4:4<361::AID-CFM66>3.0.CO;2-F","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a plasticity bond model for steel reinforcement\",\"authors\":\"James V. Cox,&nbsp;Leonard R. Herrmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(199907)4:4<361::AID-CFM66>3.0.CO;2-F\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The validation of a plasticity model for bond between ribbed, steel bars and concrete is discussed. The model relates local slip and radial dilation to bond stress and radial confinement stress, i.e. it provides an interface characterization of the behaviour of a finite-thickness region around the bar—the <i>bond zone</i>. The validation study considers experimental results from six independent investigations. The specimens are all pull-out specimens but differ significantly in size and configuration. Models for each specimen, based on a single bond model calibration, reproduce the experimental results with acceptable accuracy. The response over the full range of slip and the mode of failure are examined. Some of the model's strengths, weaknesses, and potential improvements are discussed. For the most part, the models predicts the experimental bond strength within 20 per cent and exhibits the potential to predict both pull-out and splitting failures. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mechanics of Cohesive-frictional Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(199907)4:4<361::AID-CFM66>3.0.CO;2-F\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mechanics of Cohesive-frictional Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-1484%28199907%294%3A4%3C361%3A%3AAID-CFM66%3E3.0.CO%3B2-F\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mechanics of Cohesive-frictional Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-1484%28199907%294%3A4%3C361%3A%3AAID-CFM66%3E3.0.CO%3B2-F","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

讨论了肋、钢筋和混凝土之间粘结的塑性模型的验证。该模型将局部滑移和径向膨胀与粘结应力和径向约束应力联系起来,即它提供了钢筋周围有限厚度区域(粘结区)行为的界面特征。验证研究考虑了六项独立调查的实验结果。试样均为拔出试样,但在尺寸和配置上存在显著差异。每个样本的模型基于单键模型校准,以可接受的精度再现实验结果。对整个滑移范围内的响应和失效模式进行了检验。讨论了该模型的一些优点、缺点和潜在的改进。在大多数情况下,这些模型预测的实验结合强度在20%以内,并显示出预测拉拔和劈裂失效的潜力。版权所有©1999 John Wiley&;有限公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of a plasticity bond model for steel reinforcement

The validation of a plasticity model for bond between ribbed, steel bars and concrete is discussed. The model relates local slip and radial dilation to bond stress and radial confinement stress, i.e. it provides an interface characterization of the behaviour of a finite-thickness region around the bar—the bond zone. The validation study considers experimental results from six independent investigations. The specimens are all pull-out specimens but differ significantly in size and configuration. Models for each specimen, based on a single bond model calibration, reproduce the experimental results with acceptable accuracy. The response over the full range of slip and the mode of failure are examined. Some of the model's strengths, weaknesses, and potential improvements are discussed. For the most part, the models predicts the experimental bond strength within 20 per cent and exhibits the potential to predict both pull-out and splitting failures. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信