{"title":"技术承诺和战略资源定价","authors":"Ali M. Khadr","doi":"10.1016/0165-0572(92)90007-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines optimal pricing strategies by a resource seller when endogenously-determined investment by users in resource-specific technologies creates a ‘lagged’ resource demand structure. The analysis reveals that: (i) if the seller can credibly pre-commit to a resource price path at the initial date, the optimal path features ‘high’ prices at the outset, followed by ‘low’ prices over a subsequent interval and an ‘intermediate’ long-run price; (ii) a subgame-perfect equilibrium in feedback strategies features consistently ‘high’ prices and makes both seller and users worse off in the long run; but (iii) a subgame perfect equilibrium in trigger strategies can sustain the same outcome as the precommitment equilibrium.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101080,"journal":{"name":"Resources and Energy","volume":"14 3","pages":"Pages 215-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-0572(92)90007-4","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technology commitment and strategic resource pricing\",\"authors\":\"Ali M. Khadr\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0165-0572(92)90007-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper examines optimal pricing strategies by a resource seller when endogenously-determined investment by users in resource-specific technologies creates a ‘lagged’ resource demand structure. The analysis reveals that: (i) if the seller can credibly pre-commit to a resource price path at the initial date, the optimal path features ‘high’ prices at the outset, followed by ‘low’ prices over a subsequent interval and an ‘intermediate’ long-run price; (ii) a subgame-perfect equilibrium in feedback strategies features consistently ‘high’ prices and makes both seller and users worse off in the long run; but (iii) a subgame perfect equilibrium in trigger strategies can sustain the same outcome as the precommitment equilibrium.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources and Energy\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 215-231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-0572(92)90007-4\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources and Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0165057292900074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources and Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0165057292900074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Technology commitment and strategic resource pricing
This paper examines optimal pricing strategies by a resource seller when endogenously-determined investment by users in resource-specific technologies creates a ‘lagged’ resource demand structure. The analysis reveals that: (i) if the seller can credibly pre-commit to a resource price path at the initial date, the optimal path features ‘high’ prices at the outset, followed by ‘low’ prices over a subsequent interval and an ‘intermediate’ long-run price; (ii) a subgame-perfect equilibrium in feedback strategies features consistently ‘high’ prices and makes both seller and users worse off in the long run; but (iii) a subgame perfect equilibrium in trigger strategies can sustain the same outcome as the precommitment equilibrium.