瑞芬太尼对上消化道内镜丙泊酚镇静患者苏醒的影响:随机临床研究

IF 1 Q3 Medicine
Gustavo Nadal Uliana , Elizabeth Milla Tambara , Renato Tambara Filho , Giorgio Alfredo Pedroso Baretta
{"title":"瑞芬太尼对上消化道内镜丙泊酚镇静患者苏醒的影响:随机临床研究","authors":"Gustavo Nadal Uliana ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Milla Tambara ,&nbsp;Renato Tambara Filho ,&nbsp;Giorgio Alfredo Pedroso Baretta","doi":"10.1016/j.bjan.2020.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Sedation for endoscopic procedures aims to provide high quality sedation, lower risks, short recovery time, superior recovery quality and absence of side effects, seeking high patient level of satisfaction. The goal of the study was to assess administration of remifentanil combined with propofol regarding the effects of the drug association during sedation and recovery for patients submitted to upper GI diagnostic endoscopy.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>One hundred and five patients were assessed, randomly divided into three groups of 35 patients. The Control Group was sedated with propofol alone. Study Group 1 was sedated with a fixed dose of 0.2 μg.kg<sup>‐1</sup> remifentanil combined with propofol. Study Group 2 was sedated with 0.3 μg.kg<sup>‐1</sup> remifentanil combined with propofol. We assessed the quality of sedation, hemodynamic parameters, incidence of significant hypoxemia, time for spontaneous eye opening, post‐anesthetic recovery time, quality of post‐anesthetic recovery, presence of side effects and patient satisfaction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Study Group 1 showed better quality of sedation. The groups in which remifentanil was administered combined with propofol showed shorter eye‐opening time and shorter post‐anesthetic recovery time compared to the control group. The three groups presented hemodynamic changes at some of the moments assessed. The incidence of significant hypoxemia, the quality of post‐anesthetic recovery, the incidence of side effects and patient satisfaction were similar in the three groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The combination of propofol with remifentanil at a dose of 0.2 μg.kg<sup>‐1</sup> was effective in improving the quality of sedation, and at doses of 0.2 μg.kg<sup>‐1</sup> and 0.3 μg.kg<sup>‐1</sup> reduced the time to spontaneous eye opening and post‐anesthetic recovery in comparison to sedation with propofol administered alone.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21261,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","volume":"70 3","pages":"Pages 262-270"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjan.2020.03.004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efeitos do remifentanil sobre despertar de pacientes sedados com propofol para endoscopia digestiva alta: estudo clínico randomizado\",\"authors\":\"Gustavo Nadal Uliana ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Milla Tambara ,&nbsp;Renato Tambara Filho ,&nbsp;Giorgio Alfredo Pedroso Baretta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjan.2020.03.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Sedation for endoscopic procedures aims to provide high quality sedation, lower risks, short recovery time, superior recovery quality and absence of side effects, seeking high patient level of satisfaction. The goal of the study was to assess administration of remifentanil combined with propofol regarding the effects of the drug association during sedation and recovery for patients submitted to upper GI diagnostic endoscopy.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>One hundred and five patients were assessed, randomly divided into three groups of 35 patients. The Control Group was sedated with propofol alone. Study Group 1 was sedated with a fixed dose of 0.2 μg.kg<sup>‐1</sup> remifentanil combined with propofol. Study Group 2 was sedated with 0.3 μg.kg<sup>‐1</sup> remifentanil combined with propofol. We assessed the quality of sedation, hemodynamic parameters, incidence of significant hypoxemia, time for spontaneous eye opening, post‐anesthetic recovery time, quality of post‐anesthetic recovery, presence of side effects and patient satisfaction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Study Group 1 showed better quality of sedation. The groups in which remifentanil was administered combined with propofol showed shorter eye‐opening time and shorter post‐anesthetic recovery time compared to the control group. The three groups presented hemodynamic changes at some of the moments assessed. The incidence of significant hypoxemia, the quality of post‐anesthetic recovery, the incidence of side effects and patient satisfaction were similar in the three groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The combination of propofol with remifentanil at a dose of 0.2 μg.kg<sup>‐1</sup> was effective in improving the quality of sedation, and at doses of 0.2 μg.kg<sup>‐1</sup> and 0.3 μg.kg<sup>‐1</sup> reduced the time to spontaneous eye opening and post‐anesthetic recovery in comparison to sedation with propofol administered alone.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia\",\"volume\":\"70 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 262-270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjan.2020.03.004\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034709419300716\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034709419300716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的内镜手术的目的是提供高质量的镇静、低风险、短恢复时间、优越的恢复质量和无副作用,寻求高患者满意度。本研究的目的是评估瑞芬太尼联合丙泊酚给药对接受上消化道诊断内镜检查的患者在镇静和恢复期间药物相关性的影响。方法将105例患者随机分为三组,每组35例。对照组采用丙泊酚单独镇静。研究组1采用固定剂量0.2μg.kg-1瑞芬太尼联合丙泊酚镇静。研究组2采用0.3μg.kg-1瑞芬太尼联合丙泊酚镇静。我们评估了镇静质量、血液动力学参数、严重低氧血症的发生率、自主睁眼时间、麻醉后恢复时间、麻醉前恢复质量、是否存在副作用和患者满意度。结果研究组1的镇静质量较好。与对照组相比,瑞芬太尼联合丙泊酚给药组的睁眼时间更短,麻醉后恢复时间更短。三组患者在评估的某些时刻出现血液动力学变化。三组患者的严重低氧血症发生率、麻醉后恢复质量、副作用发生率和患者满意度相似。结论丙泊酚与瑞芬太尼联合使用0.2μg.kg-1剂量可有效提高镇静质量,与单独使用丙泊酚镇静相比,0.2μg.kg-1和0.3μg.kg-1剂量可缩短自主睁眼和麻醉后恢复的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efeitos do remifentanil sobre despertar de pacientes sedados com propofol para endoscopia digestiva alta: estudo clínico randomizado

Background and objectives

Sedation for endoscopic procedures aims to provide high quality sedation, lower risks, short recovery time, superior recovery quality and absence of side effects, seeking high patient level of satisfaction. The goal of the study was to assess administration of remifentanil combined with propofol regarding the effects of the drug association during sedation and recovery for patients submitted to upper GI diagnostic endoscopy.

Method

One hundred and five patients were assessed, randomly divided into three groups of 35 patients. The Control Group was sedated with propofol alone. Study Group 1 was sedated with a fixed dose of 0.2 μg.kg‐1 remifentanil combined with propofol. Study Group 2 was sedated with 0.3 μg.kg‐1 remifentanil combined with propofol. We assessed the quality of sedation, hemodynamic parameters, incidence of significant hypoxemia, time for spontaneous eye opening, post‐anesthetic recovery time, quality of post‐anesthetic recovery, presence of side effects and patient satisfaction.

Results

Study Group 1 showed better quality of sedation. The groups in which remifentanil was administered combined with propofol showed shorter eye‐opening time and shorter post‐anesthetic recovery time compared to the control group. The three groups presented hemodynamic changes at some of the moments assessed. The incidence of significant hypoxemia, the quality of post‐anesthetic recovery, the incidence of side effects and patient satisfaction were similar in the three groups.

Conclusions

The combination of propofol with remifentanil at a dose of 0.2 μg.kg‐1 was effective in improving the quality of sedation, and at doses of 0.2 μg.kg‐1 and 0.3 μg.kg‐1 reduced the time to spontaneous eye opening and post‐anesthetic recovery in comparison to sedation with propofol administered alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology is the official journal of the Brazilian Anesthesiology Society. It publishes articles classified into the following categories: -Scientific articles (clinical or experimental trials)- Clinical information (case reports)- Reviews- Letters to the Editor- Editorials. The journal focuses primarily on clinical trials, with scope on clinical practice, aiming at providing applied tools to the anesthesiologist and critical care physician. The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology accepts articles exclusively forwarded to it. Articles already published in other journals are not accepted. All articles proposed for publication are previously submitted to the analysis of two or more members of the Editorial Board or other specialized consultants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信