Correlação entre a profundidade do espaço peridural medida no intraoperatório e a estimada por RM ou US: estudo observacional

Background and objectives

To assess the agreement between the epidural depth measured from the surgical site with the epidural depths estimated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound scanning.

Methods

Fifty patients of either sex, scheduled for L4‐5 lumbar disc surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled in this prospective observational study, and the results of 49 patients were analyzed. The actual epidural depth was measured from the surgical site with a sterile surgical scale. The MRI‐derived epidural depth was measured from the MRI scan. The ultrasound estimated epidural depth was measured from the ultrasound image obtained just before surgery.

Results

The mean epidural depth measured from the surgical site was 53.80 ± 7.67 mm, the mean MRI‐derived epidural depth was 54.06 ± 7.36 mm, and the ultrasound‐estimated epidural depth was 53.77 ± 7.94 mm. The correlation between the epidural depth measured from the surgical site and MRI‐derived epidural depth was 0.989 (r² = 0.979, p < 0.001), and the corresponding correlation with the ultrasound‐estimated epidural depth was 0.990 (r² = 0.980, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Both ultrasound‐estimated epidural depth and MRI‐derived epidural depth have a strong correlation with the epidural depth measured from the surgical site. Preprocedural MRI‐derived estimates of epidural depth are slightly deeper than the epidural depth measured from the surgical site, and the ultrasound estimated epidural depths are somewhat shallower. Although both radiologic imaging techniques provided reliable preprocedural estimates of the actual epidural depth, the loss of resistance technique cannot be discarded while inserting epidural needles.