较慢的步态速度预测社区老年人日常生活工具活动的下降:韩国老年人生活概况调查的3年前瞻性发现

Seonghun Hong MD , Sunyoung Kim MD , Jinho Yoo MD , Byung Sung Kim MD, PhD , Hyun Rim Choi MD, PhD , Sung Eun Choi PhD , Chang Gi Hong MD , Chang Won Won MD, PhD
{"title":"较慢的步态速度预测社区老年人日常生活工具活动的下降:韩国老年人生活概况调查的3年前瞻性发现","authors":"Seonghun Hong MD ,&nbsp;Sunyoung Kim MD ,&nbsp;Jinho Yoo MD ,&nbsp;Byung Sung Kim MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hyun Rim Choi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Sung Eun Choi PhD ,&nbsp;Chang Gi Hong MD ,&nbsp;Chang Won Won MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcgg.2016.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/Purpose</h3><p>Slower gait speed is a good predictor of falls, dependency, disability, and mortality. However, the cutoff point of the gait speed to best predict the bad outcomes is controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine the cutoff point of gait speed that best predicts Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) dependency.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study targeted 8000 people aged ≥ 65 years who had been enrolled in 2008 and followed up in 2011 for the Living Profiles of Older People Survey in Korea. The population was divided into an independent group and a dependent group with 2011 Korean Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (K-IADL) scores of 10 and ≥ 11, respectively. The gait speed was measured as the time taken to walk 2.5 m at a usual pace without any help, and the best result of two trials was chosen for analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The area under the curve was highest (0.642) at gait speed of 0.6 m/s, with a sensitivity and specificity of 68.44% and 55.09%, respectively. The dependency hazard ratio of IADL was statistically significant in the group with gait speed less than 0.6 m/s, 1.974 (95% confidence interval, 1.646–2.367). The dependency hazard ratio of IADL was also statistically significant in the same group after adjusting for all relevant variables, 1.613 (95% confidence interval, 1.332–1.955).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The gait speed of 0.6 m/s may be considered as the new standard of a screening tool to predict IADL dependency in Korean people aged ≥ 65 years.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100764,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Gerontology and Geriatrics","volume":"7 4","pages":"Pages 141-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jcgg.2016.05.002","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Slower gait speed predicts decline in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living in community-dwelling elderly: 3-year prospective finding from Living Profiles of Older People Survey in Korea\",\"authors\":\"Seonghun Hong MD ,&nbsp;Sunyoung Kim MD ,&nbsp;Jinho Yoo MD ,&nbsp;Byung Sung Kim MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hyun Rim Choi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Sung Eun Choi PhD ,&nbsp;Chang Gi Hong MD ,&nbsp;Chang Won Won MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcgg.2016.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background/Purpose</h3><p>Slower gait speed is a good predictor of falls, dependency, disability, and mortality. However, the cutoff point of the gait speed to best predict the bad outcomes is controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine the cutoff point of gait speed that best predicts Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) dependency.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study targeted 8000 people aged ≥ 65 years who had been enrolled in 2008 and followed up in 2011 for the Living Profiles of Older People Survey in Korea. The population was divided into an independent group and a dependent group with 2011 Korean Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (K-IADL) scores of 10 and ≥ 11, respectively. The gait speed was measured as the time taken to walk 2.5 m at a usual pace without any help, and the best result of two trials was chosen for analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The area under the curve was highest (0.642) at gait speed of 0.6 m/s, with a sensitivity and specificity of 68.44% and 55.09%, respectively. The dependency hazard ratio of IADL was statistically significant in the group with gait speed less than 0.6 m/s, 1.974 (95% confidence interval, 1.646–2.367). The dependency hazard ratio of IADL was also statistically significant in the same group after adjusting for all relevant variables, 1.613 (95% confidence interval, 1.332–1.955).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The gait speed of 0.6 m/s may be considered as the new standard of a screening tool to predict IADL dependency in Korean people aged ≥ 65 years.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Gerontology and Geriatrics\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 141-145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jcgg.2016.05.002\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Gerontology and Geriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210833516300387\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Gerontology and Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210833516300387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

背景/目的步态较慢是跌倒、依赖、残疾和死亡率的良好预测指标。然而,步态速度的临界点来最好地预测不良结果是有争议的。本研究的目的是确定步态速度的临界点,该临界点最能预测日常生活工具活动(IADL)依赖性。方法该研究的对象为8000名年龄≥65岁的人,他们于2008年参加了韩国老年人生活概况调查,并于2011年进行了随访。人群被分为独立组和依赖组,2011年韩国日常生活工具活动(K-IADL)得分分别为10分和≥11分。步态速度被测量为在没有任何帮助的情况下以正常速度行走2.5米所需的时间,并选择两次试验的最佳结果进行分析。结果步态速度为0.6m/s时,曲线下面积最高(0.642),敏感性和特异性分别为68.44%和55.09%。步态速度小于0.6 m/s组的IADL依赖危险比为1.974(95%置信区间,1.646–2.367),具有统计学意义。在校正所有相关变量后,IADL的依赖危险比在同一组中也具有统计学意义,1.613(95%置信区间,1.332-1.955)。结论0.6 m/s的步态速度可作为预测≥65岁韩国人群IADL依赖性的筛查工具的新标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Slower gait speed predicts decline in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living in community-dwelling elderly: 3-year prospective finding from Living Profiles of Older People Survey in Korea

Background/Purpose

Slower gait speed is a good predictor of falls, dependency, disability, and mortality. However, the cutoff point of the gait speed to best predict the bad outcomes is controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine the cutoff point of gait speed that best predicts Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) dependency.

Methods

The study targeted 8000 people aged ≥ 65 years who had been enrolled in 2008 and followed up in 2011 for the Living Profiles of Older People Survey in Korea. The population was divided into an independent group and a dependent group with 2011 Korean Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (K-IADL) scores of 10 and ≥ 11, respectively. The gait speed was measured as the time taken to walk 2.5 m at a usual pace without any help, and the best result of two trials was chosen for analysis.

Results

The area under the curve was highest (0.642) at gait speed of 0.6 m/s, with a sensitivity and specificity of 68.44% and 55.09%, respectively. The dependency hazard ratio of IADL was statistically significant in the group with gait speed less than 0.6 m/s, 1.974 (95% confidence interval, 1.646–2.367). The dependency hazard ratio of IADL was also statistically significant in the same group after adjusting for all relevant variables, 1.613 (95% confidence interval, 1.332–1.955).

Conclusion

The gait speed of 0.6 m/s may be considered as the new standard of a screening tool to predict IADL dependency in Korean people aged ≥ 65 years.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信