尽管在同一谱系中存在基因隔离,但蝙蝠和人类相关的常见臭虫之间并没有进化出交配后的生殖障碍(Cimex lectularius L.)。

IF 2.6 2区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY
Markéta Sasínková, Ondřej Balvín, Jana Vandrovcová, Christian Massino, Alfons R Weig, Klaus Reinhardt, Oliver Otti, Tomáš Bartonička
{"title":"尽管在同一谱系中存在基因隔离,但蝙蝠和人类相关的常见臭虫之间并没有进化出交配后的生殖障碍(Cimex lectularius L.)。","authors":"Markéta Sasínková, Ondřej Balvín, Jana Vandrovcová, Christian Massino, Alfons R Weig, Klaus Reinhardt, Oliver Otti, Tomáš Bartonička","doi":"10.1186/s12983-023-00514-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The common bedbug Cimex lectularius is a widespread ectoparasite on humans and bats. Two genetically isolated lineages, parasitizing either human (HL) or bat (BL) hosts, have been suggested to differentiate because of their distinct ecology. The distribution range of BL is within that of HL and bedbugs live mostly on synanthropic bat hosts. This sympatric co-occurrence predicts strong reproductive isolation at the post-copulatory level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We tested the post-copulatory barrier in three BL and three HL populations in reciprocal crosses, using a common-garden blood diet that was novel to both lineages. We excluded pre-copulation isolation mechanisms and studied egg-laying rates after a single mating until the depletion of sperm, and the fitness of the resulting offspring. We found a higher sperm storage capability in BL, likely reflecting the different seasonal availability of HL and BL hosts. We also observed a notable variation in sperm function at the population level within lineages and significant differences in fecundity and offspring fitness between lineages. However, no difference in egg numbers or offspring fitness was observed between within- and between-lineage crosses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differences in sperm storage or egg-laying rates between HL and BL that we found did not affect reproductive isolation. Neither did the population-specific variation in sperm function. Overall, our results show no post-copulatory reproductive isolation between the lineages. How genetic differentiation in sympatry is maintained in the absence of a post-copulatory barrier between BL and HL remains to be investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":55142,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Zoology","volume":"20 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10636883/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Despite genetic isolation in sympatry, post-copulatory reproductive barriers have not evolved between bat- and human-associated common bedbugs (Cimex lectularius L.).\",\"authors\":\"Markéta Sasínková, Ondřej Balvín, Jana Vandrovcová, Christian Massino, Alfons R Weig, Klaus Reinhardt, Oliver Otti, Tomáš Bartonička\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12983-023-00514-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The common bedbug Cimex lectularius is a widespread ectoparasite on humans and bats. Two genetically isolated lineages, parasitizing either human (HL) or bat (BL) hosts, have been suggested to differentiate because of their distinct ecology. The distribution range of BL is within that of HL and bedbugs live mostly on synanthropic bat hosts. This sympatric co-occurrence predicts strong reproductive isolation at the post-copulatory level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We tested the post-copulatory barrier in three BL and three HL populations in reciprocal crosses, using a common-garden blood diet that was novel to both lineages. We excluded pre-copulation isolation mechanisms and studied egg-laying rates after a single mating until the depletion of sperm, and the fitness of the resulting offspring. We found a higher sperm storage capability in BL, likely reflecting the different seasonal availability of HL and BL hosts. We also observed a notable variation in sperm function at the population level within lineages and significant differences in fecundity and offspring fitness between lineages. However, no difference in egg numbers or offspring fitness was observed between within- and between-lineage crosses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differences in sperm storage or egg-laying rates between HL and BL that we found did not affect reproductive isolation. Neither did the population-specific variation in sperm function. Overall, our results show no post-copulatory reproductive isolation between the lineages. How genetic differentiation in sympatry is maintained in the absence of a post-copulatory barrier between BL and HL remains to be investigated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Zoology\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10636883/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Zoology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-023-00514-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-023-00514-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:普通臭虫是一种广泛分布于人类和蝙蝠身上的外寄生虫。寄生在人类(HL)或蝙蝠(BL)宿主上的两个基因分离谱系,由于其独特的生态,被认为是可以区分的。BL的分布范围在HL的分布范围内,臭虫主要生活在嗜人蝙蝠宿主上。这种共现症状预示着在交配后的水平上会出现强烈的生殖隔离。结果:我们在三个BL和三个HL种群的互惠杂交中测试了交配后屏障,使用了两个谱系都很新颖的普通花园血液饮食。我们排除了交配前的隔离机制,并研究了单次交配后直到精子耗尽的产卵率,以及由此产生的后代的适应性。我们发现BL中有更高的精子储存能力,这可能反映了HL和BL宿主的季节性可用性不同。我们还观察到,在谱系内的群体水平上,精子功能存在显著差异,谱系之间的繁殖力和后代适应性存在显著差异。然而,在谱系内杂交和谱系间杂交之间,没有观察到卵子数量或后代适应性的差异。结论:我们发现HL和BL之间精子储存或产卵率的差异不会影响生殖隔离。精子功能的群体特异性变异也没有。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,两个谱系之间没有交配后生殖隔离。在BL和HL之间没有交配后屏障的情况下,如何维持症状中的遗传分化仍有待研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Despite genetic isolation in sympatry, post-copulatory reproductive barriers have not evolved between bat- and human-associated common bedbugs (Cimex lectularius L.).

Background: The common bedbug Cimex lectularius is a widespread ectoparasite on humans and bats. Two genetically isolated lineages, parasitizing either human (HL) or bat (BL) hosts, have been suggested to differentiate because of their distinct ecology. The distribution range of BL is within that of HL and bedbugs live mostly on synanthropic bat hosts. This sympatric co-occurrence predicts strong reproductive isolation at the post-copulatory level.

Results: We tested the post-copulatory barrier in three BL and three HL populations in reciprocal crosses, using a common-garden blood diet that was novel to both lineages. We excluded pre-copulation isolation mechanisms and studied egg-laying rates after a single mating until the depletion of sperm, and the fitness of the resulting offspring. We found a higher sperm storage capability in BL, likely reflecting the different seasonal availability of HL and BL hosts. We also observed a notable variation in sperm function at the population level within lineages and significant differences in fecundity and offspring fitness between lineages. However, no difference in egg numbers or offspring fitness was observed between within- and between-lineage crosses.

Conclusions: Differences in sperm storage or egg-laying rates between HL and BL that we found did not affect reproductive isolation. Neither did the population-specific variation in sperm function. Overall, our results show no post-copulatory reproductive isolation between the lineages. How genetic differentiation in sympatry is maintained in the absence of a post-copulatory barrier between BL and HL remains to be investigated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Zoology is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal publishing high quality research articles and reviews on all aspects of animal life. As a biological discipline, zoology has one of the longest histories. Today it occasionally appears as though, due to the rapid expansion of life sciences, zoology has been replaced by more or less independent sub-disciplines amongst which exchange is often sparse. However, the recent advance of molecular methodology into "classical" fields of biology, and the development of theories that can explain phenomena on different levels of organisation, has led to a re-integration of zoological disciplines promoting a broader than usual approach to zoological questions. Zoology has re-emerged as an integrative discipline encompassing the most diverse aspects of animal life, from the level of the gene to the level of the ecosystem. Frontiers in Zoology is the first open access journal focusing on zoology as a whole. It aims to represent and re-unite the various disciplines that look at animal life from different perspectives and at providing the basis for a comprehensive understanding of zoological phenomena on all levels of analysis. Frontiers in Zoology provides a unique opportunity to publish high quality research and reviews on zoological issues that will be internationally accessible to any reader at no cost. The journal was initiated and is supported by the Deutsche Zoologische Gesellschaft, one of the largest national zoological societies with more than a century-long tradition in promoting high-level zoological research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信