心理健康政策需要什么类型的信息？

IF 1 4区医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES

Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics Pub Date : 1999-12-24 DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1099-176X(199909)2:3<141::AID-MHP56>3.0.CO;2-1

Roland Sturm

{"title":"心理健康政策需要什么类型的信息？","authors":"Roland Sturm","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1099-176X(199909)2:3<141::AID-MHP56>3.0.CO;2-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The most valuable research integrates from thre levels of investigation: clinical efficacy, ‘real life’ effectiveness (including cost-effectiveness) and policy research. Successful applications of systematic reviews have largely been limited to clinical efficacy questions. The contribution of systematic reviews/meta-analyses to effectiveness and economic questions in mental health has been very minor and their contribution to inform policy is negligible. The latter is unlikely to change due to the different type of information that policy makers need.</p>","PeriodicalId":46381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","volume":"2 3","pages":"141-144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1099-176X(199909)2:3<141::AID-MHP56>3.0.CO;2-1","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What type of information is needed to inform mental health policy?\",\"authors\":\"Roland Sturm\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1099-176X(199909)2:3<141::AID-MHP56>3.0.CO;2-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The most valuable research integrates from thre levels of investigation: clinical efficacy, ‘real life’ effectiveness (including cost-effectiveness) and policy research. Successful applications of systematic reviews have largely been limited to clinical efficacy questions. The contribution of systematic reviews/meta-analyses to effectiveness and economic questions in mental health has been very minor and their contribution to inform policy is negligible. The latter is unlikely to change due to the different type of information that policy makers need.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"141-144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1099-176X(199909)2:3<141::AID-MHP56>3.0.CO;2-1\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-176X%28199909%292%3A3%3C141%3A%3AAID-MHP56%3E3.0.CO%3B2-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-176X%28199909%292%3A3%3C141%3A%3AAID-MHP56%3E3.0.CO%3B2-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

摘要

最有价值的研究综合了三个层次的调查：临床疗效、“现实生活”疗效（包括成本效益）和政策研究。系统综述的成功应用在很大程度上局限于临床疗效问题。系统审查/荟萃分析对心理健康的有效性和经济问题的贡献很小，对政策信息的贡献可以忽略不计。由于决策者需要不同类型的信息，后者不太可能改变。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

What type of information is needed to inform mental health policy?

The most valuable research integrates from thre levels of investigation: clinical efficacy, ‘real life’ effectiveness (including cost-effectiveness) and policy research. Successful applications of systematic reviews have largely been limited to clinical efficacy questions. The contribution of systematic reviews/meta-analyses to effectiveness and economic questions in mental health has been very minor and their contribution to inform policy is negligible. The latter is unlikely to change due to the different type of information that policy makers need.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics Multiple-

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

6.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics publishes high quality empirical, analytical and methodologic papers focusing on the application of health and economic research and policy analysis in mental health. It offers an international forum to enable the different participants in mental health policy and economics - psychiatrists involved in research and care and other mental health workers, health services researchers, health economists, policy makers, public and private health providers, advocacy groups, and the pharmaceutical industry - to share common information in a common language.