{"title":"隐形人、双重代理人和五工具玩家:韩国企业重组程序中首席重组官的三个问题","authors":"Jae Yup Chung, Byoung Kyu Lee","doi":"10.1002/iir.1469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Chief Restructuring Officer (CRO) system in Korea was introduced in 2011 after the Debtor Reorganization Act adopted the Debtor-in-Possession (DIP) system in 2006. However, the introduction of the CRO system in Korea, which was based on the American system, was problematic due to the lack of legal grounds, the vagueness of its legal status, and the complexity of its roles. This article explores the emerging issues related to the status and roles of a CRO in the Korean corporate-reorganization procedure. Three major issues are analyzed: lack of legal ground and its codification (“Invisible Man”), the dual legal status of being a debtor's adviser and creditors' protector (“Double Agent”), and the expansion of the CRO's roles (“Five-Tool Players”). This research also sketches the legal landscape of corporate reorganization practice in Korea. It provides some possible suggestions to foster the chances for debtor rehabilitation through improved operation of the CRO system.</p>","PeriodicalId":53971,"journal":{"name":"International Insolvency Review","volume":"31 3","pages":"403-417"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An invisible man, a double agent, and a five-tool player: Three issues for the Chief Restructuring Officer in Korean corporate reorganization procedures\",\"authors\":\"Jae Yup Chung, Byoung Kyu Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/iir.1469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Chief Restructuring Officer (CRO) system in Korea was introduced in 2011 after the Debtor Reorganization Act adopted the Debtor-in-Possession (DIP) system in 2006. However, the introduction of the CRO system in Korea, which was based on the American system, was problematic due to the lack of legal grounds, the vagueness of its legal status, and the complexity of its roles. This article explores the emerging issues related to the status and roles of a CRO in the Korean corporate-reorganization procedure. Three major issues are analyzed: lack of legal ground and its codification (“Invisible Man”), the dual legal status of being a debtor's adviser and creditors' protector (“Double Agent”), and the expansion of the CRO's roles (“Five-Tool Players”). This research also sketches the legal landscape of corporate reorganization practice in Korea. It provides some possible suggestions to foster the chances for debtor rehabilitation through improved operation of the CRO system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Insolvency Review\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"403-417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Insolvency Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iir.1469\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Insolvency Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iir.1469","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
An invisible man, a double agent, and a five-tool player: Three issues for the Chief Restructuring Officer in Korean corporate reorganization procedures
The Chief Restructuring Officer (CRO) system in Korea was introduced in 2011 after the Debtor Reorganization Act adopted the Debtor-in-Possession (DIP) system in 2006. However, the introduction of the CRO system in Korea, which was based on the American system, was problematic due to the lack of legal grounds, the vagueness of its legal status, and the complexity of its roles. This article explores the emerging issues related to the status and roles of a CRO in the Korean corporate-reorganization procedure. Three major issues are analyzed: lack of legal ground and its codification (“Invisible Man”), the dual legal status of being a debtor's adviser and creditors' protector (“Double Agent”), and the expansion of the CRO's roles (“Five-Tool Players”). This research also sketches the legal landscape of corporate reorganization practice in Korea. It provides some possible suggestions to foster the chances for debtor rehabilitation through improved operation of the CRO system.