住院和疗养院环境中专家外展团队的经济影响

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Gerald Richardson, Linda Davies, Belinda South, Rebekah Proctor, Prof Alistair Burns, Hilary Stratton Powell, Prof Nicholas Tarrier, Brian Faragher
{"title":"住院和疗养院环境中专家外展团队的经济影响","authors":"Gerald Richardson,&nbsp;Linda Davies,&nbsp;Belinda South,&nbsp;Rebekah Proctor,&nbsp;Prof Alistair Burns,&nbsp;Hilary Stratton Powell,&nbsp;Prof Nicholas Tarrier,&nbsp;Brian Faragher","doi":"10.1002/mhp.86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Background</b>: The results of a randomized controlled trial have indicated that a training and educational programme for staff in nursing or residential homes may result in reductions in levels of depression and levels of cognitive impairment for residents presenting with an active management problem. The training and educational intervention consisted of members of a hospital outreach team who presented a series of 1 hour seminars on topics which staff had indicated would improve their knowledge and skills.</p><p><b>Aims of the study</b>: The aim of this study was to present an exploratory analysis of the impact on costs associated with providing an old age psychiatry outreach team giving training and education for staff in nursing and residential homes.</p><p><b>Method</b>: For the economic study, a societal perspective was employed. Measures of resource use and costs to the health service, social and community services and the nursing and residential homes were analysed for 120 residents from 12 nursing or residential homes, as part of a randomized controlled trial to assess a training package provided in residential and nursing homes. Cost estimates were based on estimates from generalized estimated equations. To allow for clustering effects within homes, the unit of randomization was the home as opposed to the individual. To ensure models were correctly specified, several tests including the Ramsey RESET test were employed.</p><p><b>Results</b>: There were no significant differences in the total cost per person in the homes that received the intervention and the control homes. This study has shown that the additional cost of providing the specialist outreach team was likely to be covered by reductions in the use of other resources such as GP visits to nursing and residential homes. Therefore, though the study had limitations, it appeared that improved care could be provided at little or no extra cost.</p><p><b>Implications for Health Care Provision and Use</b>: The evidence presented suggests that the specialist outreach team was unlikely to add to the total cost of caring for residents in nursing and residential homes. This finding combined with the benefits in terms of lower levels of depression and cognitive impairment suggested that the intervention was good value for money. The intervention should be considered for use in other nursing and residential homes. © 2000 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":46381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","volume":"3 3","pages":"147-152"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/mhp.86","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic impact of a specialist outreach team in residential and nursing home settings\",\"authors\":\"Gerald Richardson,&nbsp;Linda Davies,&nbsp;Belinda South,&nbsp;Rebekah Proctor,&nbsp;Prof Alistair Burns,&nbsp;Hilary Stratton Powell,&nbsp;Prof Nicholas Tarrier,&nbsp;Brian Faragher\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mhp.86\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Background</b>: The results of a randomized controlled trial have indicated that a training and educational programme for staff in nursing or residential homes may result in reductions in levels of depression and levels of cognitive impairment for residents presenting with an active management problem. The training and educational intervention consisted of members of a hospital outreach team who presented a series of 1 hour seminars on topics which staff had indicated would improve their knowledge and skills.</p><p><b>Aims of the study</b>: The aim of this study was to present an exploratory analysis of the impact on costs associated with providing an old age psychiatry outreach team giving training and education for staff in nursing and residential homes.</p><p><b>Method</b>: For the economic study, a societal perspective was employed. Measures of resource use and costs to the health service, social and community services and the nursing and residential homes were analysed for 120 residents from 12 nursing or residential homes, as part of a randomized controlled trial to assess a training package provided in residential and nursing homes. Cost estimates were based on estimates from generalized estimated equations. To allow for clustering effects within homes, the unit of randomization was the home as opposed to the individual. To ensure models were correctly specified, several tests including the Ramsey RESET test were employed.</p><p><b>Results</b>: There were no significant differences in the total cost per person in the homes that received the intervention and the control homes. This study has shown that the additional cost of providing the specialist outreach team was likely to be covered by reductions in the use of other resources such as GP visits to nursing and residential homes. Therefore, though the study had limitations, it appeared that improved care could be provided at little or no extra cost.</p><p><b>Implications for Health Care Provision and Use</b>: The evidence presented suggests that the specialist outreach team was unlikely to add to the total cost of caring for residents in nursing and residential homes. This finding combined with the benefits in terms of lower levels of depression and cognitive impairment suggested that the intervention was good value for money. The intervention should be considered for use in other nursing and residential homes. © 2000 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"147-152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/mhp.86\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhp.86\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhp.86","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:一项随机对照试验的结果表明,对护理院或疗养院工作人员的培训和教育计划可能会降低有积极管理问题的居民的抑郁水平和认知障碍水平。培训和教育干预由一个医院外展小组的成员组成,他们就工作人员表示将提高他们的知识和技能的主题举办了一系列1小时的研讨会。研究目的:本研究的目的是对提供一个老年精神病学外展团队为护理院和疗养院的工作人员提供培训和教育对成本的影响进行探索性分析。方法:经济研究采用社会视角。作为一项随机对照试验的一部分,对来自12家疗养院或寄宿家庭的120名居民的医疗服务、社会和社区服务以及疗养院和寄宿家庭的资源使用和成本进行了分析,以评估寄宿和寄宿家庭提供的培训包。成本估算是基于广义估算方程的估算。为了考虑家庭内的聚集效应,随机化的单位是家庭,而不是个人。为了确保正确指定模型,采用了包括拉姆齐重置测试在内的多项测试。结果:接受干预的家庭和对照家庭的人均总成本没有显著差异。这项研究表明,提供专家外展团队的额外费用可能会通过减少其他资源的使用来弥补,例如全科医生对养老院和疗养院的访问。因此,尽管这项研究有局限性,但似乎可以在很少或没有额外费用的情况下提供改善的护理。对医疗保健提供和使用的影响:所提供的证据表明,专家外展团队不太可能增加护理院和疗养院居民的护理总成本。这一发现与降低抑郁和认知障碍水平的益处相结合,表明干预措施物有所值。这种干预措施应考虑在其他疗养院和疗养院使用。©2000 John Wiley&;有限公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economic impact of a specialist outreach team in residential and nursing home settings

Background: The results of a randomized controlled trial have indicated that a training and educational programme for staff in nursing or residential homes may result in reductions in levels of depression and levels of cognitive impairment for residents presenting with an active management problem. The training and educational intervention consisted of members of a hospital outreach team who presented a series of 1 hour seminars on topics which staff had indicated would improve their knowledge and skills.

Aims of the study: The aim of this study was to present an exploratory analysis of the impact on costs associated with providing an old age psychiatry outreach team giving training and education for staff in nursing and residential homes.

Method: For the economic study, a societal perspective was employed. Measures of resource use and costs to the health service, social and community services and the nursing and residential homes were analysed for 120 residents from 12 nursing or residential homes, as part of a randomized controlled trial to assess a training package provided in residential and nursing homes. Cost estimates were based on estimates from generalized estimated equations. To allow for clustering effects within homes, the unit of randomization was the home as opposed to the individual. To ensure models were correctly specified, several tests including the Ramsey RESET test were employed.

Results: There were no significant differences in the total cost per person in the homes that received the intervention and the control homes. This study has shown that the additional cost of providing the specialist outreach team was likely to be covered by reductions in the use of other resources such as GP visits to nursing and residential homes. Therefore, though the study had limitations, it appeared that improved care could be provided at little or no extra cost.

Implications for Health Care Provision and Use: The evidence presented suggests that the specialist outreach team was unlikely to add to the total cost of caring for residents in nursing and residential homes. This finding combined with the benefits in terms of lower levels of depression and cognitive impairment suggested that the intervention was good value for money. The intervention should be considered for use in other nursing and residential homes. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics publishes high quality empirical, analytical and methodologic papers focusing on the application of health and economic research and policy analysis in mental health. It offers an international forum to enable the different participants in mental health policy and economics - psychiatrists involved in research and care and other mental health workers, health services researchers, health economists, policy makers, public and private health providers, advocacy groups, and the pharmaceutical industry - to share common information in a common language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信