基于仿射的重建攻击在血管特征点重建中的失败

IF 1.8 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
IET Biometrics Pub Date : 2021-07-28 DOI:10.1049/bme2.12048
Mahshid Sadeghpour, Arathi Arakala, Stephen A. Davis, Kathy J. Horadam
{"title":"基于仿射的重建攻击在血管特征点重建中的失败","authors":"Mahshid Sadeghpour,&nbsp;Arathi Arakala,&nbsp;Stephen A. Davis,&nbsp;Kathy J. Horadam","doi":"10.1049/bme2.12048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Inverse biometrics methods are a major privacy concern for users of biometric recognition systems. Affine-based reconstruction attack is an inverse biometrics method that models the biometric recognition algorithm by an affine approximation. This type of attack reconstructs targeted biometric references using the modelled biometric recognition algorithm and the comparison scores issued by the system. Although this reconstruction method has only been successfully applied to reconstruct face images, the common consensus is that any biometric system that issues comparison scores could be vulnerable to such an attack since this method is sufficiently general to be applied to other biometric templates. Here it is shown that the attack fails to regenerate sparse vascular feature point templates. The reconstruction attack on feature point patterns extracted from retina and hand vascular images is tested. The inverse attack match rate for reconstructed reference templates was 0.3% in one experiment using retinal vasculature and 0% for all others. These results show that the reconstruction attack is not as catastrophic as it is widely accepted to be, and that vascular biometric template protection schemes that store sparse templates as references and reveal comparison scores are not susceptible to affine-based reconstruction attacks.</p>","PeriodicalId":48821,"journal":{"name":"IET Biometrics","volume":"10 5","pages":"497-517"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/bme2.12048","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Failure of affine-based reconstruction attack in regenerating vascular feature points\",\"authors\":\"Mahshid Sadeghpour,&nbsp;Arathi Arakala,&nbsp;Stephen A. Davis,&nbsp;Kathy J. Horadam\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/bme2.12048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Inverse biometrics methods are a major privacy concern for users of biometric recognition systems. Affine-based reconstruction attack is an inverse biometrics method that models the biometric recognition algorithm by an affine approximation. This type of attack reconstructs targeted biometric references using the modelled biometric recognition algorithm and the comparison scores issued by the system. Although this reconstruction method has only been successfully applied to reconstruct face images, the common consensus is that any biometric system that issues comparison scores could be vulnerable to such an attack since this method is sufficiently general to be applied to other biometric templates. Here it is shown that the attack fails to regenerate sparse vascular feature point templates. The reconstruction attack on feature point patterns extracted from retina and hand vascular images is tested. The inverse attack match rate for reconstructed reference templates was 0.3% in one experiment using retinal vasculature and 0% for all others. These results show that the reconstruction attack is not as catastrophic as it is widely accepted to be, and that vascular biometric template protection schemes that store sparse templates as references and reveal comparison scores are not susceptible to affine-based reconstruction attacks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IET Biometrics\",\"volume\":\"10 5\",\"pages\":\"497-517\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/bme2.12048\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IET Biometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/bme2.12048\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Biometrics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/bme2.12048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

反向生物识别方法是生物识别系统用户关注的主要隐私问题。基于仿射的重建攻击是一种通过仿射近似对生物特征识别算法进行建模的逆生物特征方法。这种类型的攻击使用建模的生物特征识别算法和系统发布的比较分数来重建目标生物特征参考。尽管这种重建方法只成功地应用于重建人脸图像,但普遍的共识是,任何发布比较分数的生物特征系统都可能容易受到这种攻击,因为这种方法足够通用,可以应用于其他生物特征模板。结果表明,该攻击无法重新生成稀疏的血管特征点模板。测试了对从视网膜和手部血管图像中提取的特征点模式的重建攻击。在一个使用视网膜血管系统的实验中,重建的参考模板的反向攻击匹配率为0.3%,而在所有其他实验中为0%。这些结果表明,重建攻击并不像人们普遍接受的那样具有灾难性,并且将稀疏模板存储为参考并显示比较分数的血管生物特征模板保护方案不易受到基于仿射的重建攻击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Failure of affine-based reconstruction attack in regenerating vascular feature points

Failure of affine-based reconstruction attack in regenerating vascular feature points

Inverse biometrics methods are a major privacy concern for users of biometric recognition systems. Affine-based reconstruction attack is an inverse biometrics method that models the biometric recognition algorithm by an affine approximation. This type of attack reconstructs targeted biometric references using the modelled biometric recognition algorithm and the comparison scores issued by the system. Although this reconstruction method has only been successfully applied to reconstruct face images, the common consensus is that any biometric system that issues comparison scores could be vulnerable to such an attack since this method is sufficiently general to be applied to other biometric templates. Here it is shown that the attack fails to regenerate sparse vascular feature point templates. The reconstruction attack on feature point patterns extracted from retina and hand vascular images is tested. The inverse attack match rate for reconstructed reference templates was 0.3% in one experiment using retinal vasculature and 0% for all others. These results show that the reconstruction attack is not as catastrophic as it is widely accepted to be, and that vascular biometric template protection schemes that store sparse templates as references and reveal comparison scores are not susceptible to affine-based reconstruction attacks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IET Biometrics
IET Biometrics COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: The field of biometric recognition - automated recognition of individuals based on their behavioural and biological characteristics - has now reached a level of maturity where viable practical applications are both possible and increasingly available. The biometrics field is characterised especially by its interdisciplinarity since, while focused primarily around a strong technological base, effective system design and implementation often requires a broad range of skills encompassing, for example, human factors, data security and database technologies, psychological and physiological awareness, and so on. Also, the technology focus itself embraces diversity, since the engineering of effective biometric systems requires integration of image analysis, pattern recognition, sensor technology, database engineering, security design and many other strands of understanding. The scope of the journal is intentionally relatively wide. While focusing on core technological issues, it is recognised that these may be inherently diverse and in many cases may cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The scope of the journal will therefore include any topics where it can be shown that a paper can increase our understanding of biometric systems, signal future developments and applications for biometrics, or promote greater practical uptake for relevant technologies: Development and enhancement of individual biometric modalities including the established and traditional modalities (e.g. face, fingerprint, iris, signature and handwriting recognition) and also newer or emerging modalities (gait, ear-shape, neurological patterns, etc.) Multibiometrics, theoretical and practical issues, implementation of practical systems, multiclassifier and multimodal approaches Soft biometrics and information fusion for identification, verification and trait prediction Human factors and the human-computer interface issues for biometric systems, exception handling strategies Template construction and template management, ageing factors and their impact on biometric systems Usability and user-oriented design, psychological and physiological principles and system integration Sensors and sensor technologies for biometric processing Database technologies to support biometric systems Implementation of biometric systems, security engineering implications, smartcard and associated technologies in implementation, implementation platforms, system design and performance evaluation Trust and privacy issues, security of biometric systems and supporting technological solutions, biometric template protection Biometric cryptosystems, security and biometrics-linked encryption Links with forensic processing and cross-disciplinary commonalities Core underpinning technologies (e.g. image analysis, pattern recognition, computer vision, signal processing, etc.), where the specific relevance to biometric processing can be demonstrated Applications and application-led considerations Position papers on technology or on the industrial context of biometric system development Adoption and promotion of standards in biometrics, improving technology acceptance, deployment and interoperability, avoiding cross-cultural and cross-sector restrictions Relevant ethical and social issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信