草坪草-禁止生物栖息地访花昆虫标本取样方法的评价

Isadora G. P. de Souza, Edicarlos B. de Castro, Gerald M. Henry, David W. Held, JoVonn G. Hill, James D. McCurdy
{"title":"草坪草-禁止生物栖息地访花昆虫标本取样方法的评价","authors":"Isadora G. P. de Souza,&nbsp;Edicarlos B. de Castro,&nbsp;Gerald M. Henry,&nbsp;David W. Held,&nbsp;JoVonn G. Hill,&nbsp;James D. McCurdy","doi":"10.1002/its2.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pollination is fundamental to healthy ecosystems, and global pollination services have been valued at over $200 billion annually. However, landscape fragmentation, urban growth, and ecosystem degradation adversely influence insect pollinator biodiversity. Efforts to mitigate these factors must be enhanced in order to establish and increase pollinator populations. As such, a better understanding of the landscapes that make up their habitats may help mitigate these negative effects. Gauging the effect of landscapes on pollinators requires identification of insect richness and abundance, but studies that evaluate trapping and netting methodology over established turfgrass–forb habitat are scant. Here, we present preliminary findings from a single location (Starkville, MS) regarding the effectiveness of two sampling methodologies, netting, and pan traps. Methods were compared over bermudagrass (<i>Cynodon dactylon</i>) mixed with white clover (<i>Trifolium repens</i>). The total abundance, taxa abundance, and the link between insect taxa and method were examined. Netting was found to be more effective at catching pollinators, especially those belonging to the <i>Apidae</i> and <i>Syrphidae</i> families. <i>Apidae</i> and <i>Syrphidae</i> were the most abundant families present. <i>Halictidae</i> showed higher abundance in pan traps, however, no significant difference in abundance was found between it and other families. Ongoing work seeks to identify all samples to species level. The work presented here has been replicated at another site and will be combined with this study to enable broader inferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":100722,"journal":{"name":"International Turfgrass Society Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/its2.114","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of flower visiting insects specimen sampling methodology in turfgrass–forb habitat\",\"authors\":\"Isadora G. P. de Souza,&nbsp;Edicarlos B. de Castro,&nbsp;Gerald M. Henry,&nbsp;David W. Held,&nbsp;JoVonn G. Hill,&nbsp;James D. McCurdy\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/its2.114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Pollination is fundamental to healthy ecosystems, and global pollination services have been valued at over $200 billion annually. However, landscape fragmentation, urban growth, and ecosystem degradation adversely influence insect pollinator biodiversity. Efforts to mitigate these factors must be enhanced in order to establish and increase pollinator populations. As such, a better understanding of the landscapes that make up their habitats may help mitigate these negative effects. Gauging the effect of landscapes on pollinators requires identification of insect richness and abundance, but studies that evaluate trapping and netting methodology over established turfgrass–forb habitat are scant. Here, we present preliminary findings from a single location (Starkville, MS) regarding the effectiveness of two sampling methodologies, netting, and pan traps. Methods were compared over bermudagrass (<i>Cynodon dactylon</i>) mixed with white clover (<i>Trifolium repens</i>). The total abundance, taxa abundance, and the link between insect taxa and method were examined. Netting was found to be more effective at catching pollinators, especially those belonging to the <i>Apidae</i> and <i>Syrphidae</i> families. <i>Apidae</i> and <i>Syrphidae</i> were the most abundant families present. <i>Halictidae</i> showed higher abundance in pan traps, however, no significant difference in abundance was found between it and other families. Ongoing work seeks to identify all samples to species level. The work presented here has been replicated at another site and will be combined with this study to enable broader inferences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Turfgrass Society Research Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/its2.114\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Turfgrass Society Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/its2.114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Turfgrass Society Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/its2.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

授粉是健康生态系统的基础,全球授粉服务每年的价值超过2000亿美元。然而,景观破碎化、城市增长和生态系统退化对昆虫传粉昆虫的生物多样性产生了不利影响。必须加强缓解这些因素的努力,以建立和增加传粉昆虫的数量。因此,更好地了解构成它们栖息地的景观可能有助于减轻这些负面影响。要衡量景观对传粉昆虫的影响,需要确定昆虫的丰富度和丰度,但对已建立的草坪草-forb栖息地的诱捕和网捕方法进行评估的研究很少。在这里,我们介绍了来自一个地点(密歇根州斯塔克维尔)的关于两种采样方法(网捕和泛捕)有效性的初步发现。方法采用狗牙根(犬齿草)与白三叶草(三叶草)混合栽培进行比较。对总丰度、分类群丰度以及昆虫分类群与方法之间的联系进行了检验。研究发现,网捕传粉昆虫更有效,尤其是属于Apidae和Syrphide科的传粉昆虫。Apidae和Syrphide是现存数量最多的科。Halectidae在pan陷阱中表现出较高的丰度,但与其他科的丰度没有显著差异。正在进行的工作旨在识别所有物种级别的样本。这里介绍的工作已经在另一个网站上复制,并将与本研究相结合,以实现更广泛的推断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of flower visiting insects specimen sampling methodology in turfgrass–forb habitat

Evaluation of flower visiting insects specimen sampling methodology in turfgrass–forb habitat

Pollination is fundamental to healthy ecosystems, and global pollination services have been valued at over $200 billion annually. However, landscape fragmentation, urban growth, and ecosystem degradation adversely influence insect pollinator biodiversity. Efforts to mitigate these factors must be enhanced in order to establish and increase pollinator populations. As such, a better understanding of the landscapes that make up their habitats may help mitigate these negative effects. Gauging the effect of landscapes on pollinators requires identification of insect richness and abundance, but studies that evaluate trapping and netting methodology over established turfgrass–forb habitat are scant. Here, we present preliminary findings from a single location (Starkville, MS) regarding the effectiveness of two sampling methodologies, netting, and pan traps. Methods were compared over bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) mixed with white clover (Trifolium repens). The total abundance, taxa abundance, and the link between insect taxa and method were examined. Netting was found to be more effective at catching pollinators, especially those belonging to the Apidae and Syrphidae families. Apidae and Syrphidae were the most abundant families present. Halictidae showed higher abundance in pan traps, however, no significant difference in abundance was found between it and other families. Ongoing work seeks to identify all samples to species level. The work presented here has been replicated at another site and will be combined with this study to enable broader inferences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信