{"title":"铝硅共晶反应：机理与晶体学","authors":"M.M. Makhlouf, H.V. Guthy","doi":"10.1016/S1471-5317(02)00003-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The evolution of the contemporary theory for the formation and chemical modification of the aluminum–silicon eutectic is reviewed. The work of Hellawell et al., which laid the foundation for the present day understanding of this technologically important reaction, is critically examined and certain inconsistencies are shown to exist between the contemporary theory and more current concepts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Light Metals","volume":"1 4","pages":"Pages 199-218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1471-5317(02)00003-2","citationCount":"218","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The aluminum–silicon eutectic reaction: mechanisms and crystallography\",\"authors\":\"M.M. Makhlouf, H.V. Guthy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1471-5317(02)00003-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The evolution of the contemporary theory for the formation and chemical modification of the aluminum–silicon eutectic is reviewed. The work of Hellawell et al., which laid the foundation for the present day understanding of this technologically important reaction, is critically examined and certain inconsistencies are shown to exist between the contemporary theory and more current concepts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Light Metals\",\"volume\":\"1 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 199-218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1471-5317(02)00003-2\",\"citationCount\":\"218\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Light Metals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471531702000032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Light Metals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471531702000032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The aluminum–silicon eutectic reaction: mechanisms and crystallography
The evolution of the contemporary theory for the formation and chemical modification of the aluminum–silicon eutectic is reviewed. The work of Hellawell et al., which laid the foundation for the present day understanding of this technologically important reaction, is critically examined and certain inconsistencies are shown to exist between the contemporary theory and more current concepts.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
