收入增长无法弥补通货膨胀——一种价格消费异常现象

Tommy Gärling , Amelie Gamble , Fabian Christandl
{"title":"收入增长无法弥补通货膨胀——一种价格消费异常现象","authors":"Tommy Gärling ,&nbsp;Amelie Gamble ,&nbsp;Fabian Christandl","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2013.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We conjecture that lay people extrapolate past inflation, evaluate product prices relative to recalled reference prices, and perceive income increases as opportunities to increase consumption. From these conjectures we derive the hypothesis that past inflation makes products or expenditures appear more expensive, whereas income increases make them more affordable but not less expensive. In Experiment 1 205 undergraduates were in different conditions asked to imagine that they received no income increase, a 10% income increase, or that past inflation was 5%, 10% or 30%. In line with the hypothesis, expensiveness of common products and expenditures was rated higher for the higher inflation rates but not lower for the income increase. In Experiment 2 114 undergraduates imagined that they would receive a 10% income decrease or increase and that past inflation was 5% or 15%. Also in line with the hypothesis, ratings of expensiveness of the products and expenditures increased with increased inflation but did not vary with income, whereas ratings of affordability of the products and expenditures increased more with an income increase than a decrease but did not vary with inflation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88732,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of socio-economics","volume":"47 ","pages":"Pages 11-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.socec.2013.08.006","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Income increases do not compensate for perceived inflation—A price-consumption anomaly\",\"authors\":\"Tommy Gärling ,&nbsp;Amelie Gamble ,&nbsp;Fabian Christandl\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socec.2013.08.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We conjecture that lay people extrapolate past inflation, evaluate product prices relative to recalled reference prices, and perceive income increases as opportunities to increase consumption. From these conjectures we derive the hypothesis that past inflation makes products or expenditures appear more expensive, whereas income increases make them more affordable but not less expensive. In Experiment 1 205 undergraduates were in different conditions asked to imagine that they received no income increase, a 10% income increase, or that past inflation was 5%, 10% or 30%. In line with the hypothesis, expensiveness of common products and expenditures was rated higher for the higher inflation rates but not lower for the income increase. In Experiment 2 114 undergraduates imagined that they would receive a 10% income decrease or increase and that past inflation was 5% or 15%. Also in line with the hypothesis, ratings of expensiveness of the products and expenditures increased with increased inflation but did not vary with income, whereas ratings of affordability of the products and expenditures increased more with an income increase than a decrease but did not vary with inflation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of socio-economics\",\"volume\":\"47 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 11-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.socec.2013.08.006\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of socio-economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053535713001212\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of socio-economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053535713001212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们推测,外行人推断过去的通货膨胀,相对于召回的参考价格评估产品价格,并将收入增长视为增加消费的机会。从这些推测中,我们得出了一个假设,即过去的通货膨胀使产品或支出看起来更贵,而收入的增加使它们更实惠,但并不便宜。在实验1中,205名处于不同条件下的本科生被要求想象他们没有收入增加,收入增加了10%,或者过去的通货膨胀率是5%、10%或30%。根据这一假设,通货膨胀率越高,普通产品和支出的费用性就越高,而收入增长则不低。在实验2中,114名本科生认为他们的收入会减少或增加10%,而过去的通货膨胀率是5%或15%。同样与该假设一致的是,产品和支出的费用性评级随着通货膨胀的增加而增加,但不随收入的变化而变化,而产品和支出可负担性评级随着收入的增加而比随着收入的减少而增加更多,但不因通货膨胀而变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Income increases do not compensate for perceived inflation—A price-consumption anomaly

We conjecture that lay people extrapolate past inflation, evaluate product prices relative to recalled reference prices, and perceive income increases as opportunities to increase consumption. From these conjectures we derive the hypothesis that past inflation makes products or expenditures appear more expensive, whereas income increases make them more affordable but not less expensive. In Experiment 1 205 undergraduates were in different conditions asked to imagine that they received no income increase, a 10% income increase, or that past inflation was 5%, 10% or 30%. In line with the hypothesis, expensiveness of common products and expenditures was rated higher for the higher inflation rates but not lower for the income increase. In Experiment 2 114 undergraduates imagined that they would receive a 10% income decrease or increase and that past inflation was 5% or 15%. Also in line with the hypothesis, ratings of expensiveness of the products and expenditures increased with increased inflation but did not vary with income, whereas ratings of affordability of the products and expenditures increased more with an income increase than a decrease but did not vary with inflation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信