专业人员对初级和二级护理之间高血压或糖尿病患者护理回路的看法

Francisco Javier Alonso-Moreno , Nieves Martell-Claros , Mariano de la Figuera , Javier Escalada , Marta Rodríguez , Luisa Orera
{"title":"专业人员对初级和二级护理之间高血压或糖尿病患者护理回路的看法","authors":"Francisco Javier Alonso-Moreno ,&nbsp;Nieves Martell-Claros ,&nbsp;Mariano de la Figuera ,&nbsp;Javier Escalada ,&nbsp;Marta Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Luisa Orera","doi":"10.1016/j.endoen.2015.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the flow of care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension between primary care (PC) and specialized care (SC) in clinical practice, and the criteria used for referral and follow-up within the Spanish National Health System (NHS).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A descriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter study.</p></div><div><h3>Placement</h3><p>A probability convenience sampling stratified by number of physicians participating in each Spanish autonomous community was performed. Nine hundred and ninety-nine physicians were surveyed, of whom 78.1% (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->780) were primary care physicians (PCPs), while 11.9% (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->119) and 10.0% (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->100) respectively were specialists in hypertension and diabetes.</p></div><div><h3>Key measurements</h3><p>Were conducted using two self administered online surveys.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A majority of PCPs (63.7% and 55.5%) and specialists (79.8% and 45.0%) reported the lack of a protocol to coordinate the primary and specialized settings for both hypertension and T2DM respectively. The most widely used method for communication between specialists was the referral sheet (94.6% in PC and 92.4% in SC).</p><p>The main reasons for referral to a specialist were refractory hypertension (80.9%) and suspected secondary hypertension (75.6%) in hypertensive patients, and suspicion of a specific diabetes (71.9%) and pregnancy (71.7%) in T2DM patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although results showed some common characteristics between PCPs and specialists in disease management procedures, the main finding was a poor coordination between PC and SC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48670,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinologia Y Nutricion","volume":"63 1","pages":"Pages 4-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.endoen.2015.09.003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Professionals’ perception of circuits of care for hypertensive or diabetic patients between primary and secondary care\",\"authors\":\"Francisco Javier Alonso-Moreno ,&nbsp;Nieves Martell-Claros ,&nbsp;Mariano de la Figuera ,&nbsp;Javier Escalada ,&nbsp;Marta Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Luisa Orera\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.endoen.2015.09.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the flow of care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension between primary care (PC) and specialized care (SC) in clinical practice, and the criteria used for referral and follow-up within the Spanish National Health System (NHS).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A descriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter study.</p></div><div><h3>Placement</h3><p>A probability convenience sampling stratified by number of physicians participating in each Spanish autonomous community was performed. Nine hundred and ninety-nine physicians were surveyed, of whom 78.1% (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->780) were primary care physicians (PCPs), while 11.9% (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->119) and 10.0% (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->100) respectively were specialists in hypertension and diabetes.</p></div><div><h3>Key measurements</h3><p>Were conducted using two self administered online surveys.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A majority of PCPs (63.7% and 55.5%) and specialists (79.8% and 45.0%) reported the lack of a protocol to coordinate the primary and specialized settings for both hypertension and T2DM respectively. The most widely used method for communication between specialists was the referral sheet (94.6% in PC and 92.4% in SC).</p><p>The main reasons for referral to a specialist were refractory hypertension (80.9%) and suspected secondary hypertension (75.6%) in hypertensive patients, and suspicion of a specific diabetes (71.9%) and pregnancy (71.7%) in T2DM patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although results showed some common characteristics between PCPs and specialists in disease management procedures, the main finding was a poor coordination between PC and SC.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrinologia Y Nutricion\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 4-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.endoen.2015.09.003\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrinologia Y Nutricion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S217350931600009X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinologia Y Nutricion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S217350931600009X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的确定临床实践中2型糖尿病(T2DM)和高血压患者在初级护理(PC)和专科护理(SC)之间的护理流程,以及西班牙国家卫生系统(NHS)内用于转诊和随访的标准。设计一项描述性、横断面、多中心研究。地点根据参与每个西班牙自治社区的医生人数进行概率便利抽样。调查了九百九十九名医生,其中78.1%(n=780)是初级保健医生,11.9%(n=119)和10.0%(n=100)分别是高血压和糖尿病专家。使用两项自行管理的在线调查进行了关键测量。结果大多数PCP(63.7%和55.5%)和专家(79.8%和45.0%)分别报告缺乏协调高血压和T2DM的主要和专业设置的方案。专家之间最广泛使用的沟通方法是转诊单(PC为94.6%,SC为92.4%)。转诊至专家的主要原因是高血压患者的难治性高血压(80.9%)和疑似继发性高血压(75.6%),以及T2DM患者的疑似特定糖尿病(71.9%)和妊娠(71.7%)。结论尽管研究结果显示,PCP和疾病管理程序专家之间存在一些共同特征,但主要发现PC和SC之间的协调性较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Professionals’ perception of circuits of care for hypertensive or diabetic patients between primary and secondary care

Objective

To determine the flow of care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension between primary care (PC) and specialized care (SC) in clinical practice, and the criteria used for referral and follow-up within the Spanish National Health System (NHS).

Design

A descriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter study.

Placement

A probability convenience sampling stratified by number of physicians participating in each Spanish autonomous community was performed. Nine hundred and ninety-nine physicians were surveyed, of whom 78.1% (n = 780) were primary care physicians (PCPs), while 11.9% (n = 119) and 10.0% (n = 100) respectively were specialists in hypertension and diabetes.

Key measurements

Were conducted using two self administered online surveys.

Results

A majority of PCPs (63.7% and 55.5%) and specialists (79.8% and 45.0%) reported the lack of a protocol to coordinate the primary and specialized settings for both hypertension and T2DM respectively. The most widely used method for communication between specialists was the referral sheet (94.6% in PC and 92.4% in SC).

The main reasons for referral to a specialist were refractory hypertension (80.9%) and suspected secondary hypertension (75.6%) in hypertensive patients, and suspicion of a specific diabetes (71.9%) and pregnancy (71.7%) in T2DM patients.

Conclusions

Although results showed some common characteristics between PCPs and specialists in disease management procedures, the main finding was a poor coordination between PC and SC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信