常规分析和FISH法测定γ射线诱导人淋巴细胞双心室率的比较

E. Schmid, H. Braselmann, U. Nahrstedt
{"title":"常规分析和FISH法测定γ射线诱导人淋巴细胞双心室率的比较","authors":"E. Schmid,&nbsp;H. Braselmann,&nbsp;U. Nahrstedt","doi":"10.1016/0165-7992(95)00056-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In an earlier work stable aberrations and dicentrics were determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) after various doses of <sup>137</sup>Cs γ-rays. No corresponding calibration curve for dicentrics is available for determinations in terms of the conventional analysis as performed in our laboratory, In view of the potential for the application of chromosome painting to human biological dosimetry, it is desirable to determine such a calibration curve and this and the comparison of the resulting data to those obtained in terms of the FISH method is the objective of the present communication. In the study it is found that the linear-quadratic dose response curves for dicentrics, that are determined by the two methods, are significantly different, although the different target sizes are accounted for. A similar problem was found earlier for X-rays. It does not appear that the difference is due to technical difficulties in the FISH method, that has been improved by employing in addition to the whole chromosome DNA probes, a pan-centrometric DNA probe</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100934,"journal":{"name":"Mutation Research Letters","volume":"348 3","pages":"Pages 125-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-7992(95)00056-9","citationCount":"53","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of γ-ray induced dicentric yields in human lymphocytes measured by conventional analysis and FISH\",\"authors\":\"E. Schmid,&nbsp;H. Braselmann,&nbsp;U. Nahrstedt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0165-7992(95)00056-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In an earlier work stable aberrations and dicentrics were determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) after various doses of <sup>137</sup>Cs γ-rays. No corresponding calibration curve for dicentrics is available for determinations in terms of the conventional analysis as performed in our laboratory, In view of the potential for the application of chromosome painting to human biological dosimetry, it is desirable to determine such a calibration curve and this and the comparison of the resulting data to those obtained in terms of the FISH method is the objective of the present communication. In the study it is found that the linear-quadratic dose response curves for dicentrics, that are determined by the two methods, are significantly different, although the different target sizes are accounted for. A similar problem was found earlier for X-rays. It does not appear that the difference is due to technical difficulties in the FISH method, that has been improved by employing in addition to the whole chromosome DNA probes, a pan-centrometric DNA probe</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mutation Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"348 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 125-130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-7992(95)00056-9\",\"citationCount\":\"53\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mutation Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0165799295000569\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutation Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0165799295000569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

摘要

在早期的工作中,在不同剂量的137Csγ射线照射后,通过荧光原位杂交(FISH)测定了稳定的像差和双心室。根据我们实验室进行的常规分析,没有相应的双心室校准曲线可用于测定。鉴于染色体绘制在人类生物剂量测定中的应用潜力,希望确定这样的校准曲线,并且这以及所得数据与根据FISH方法获得的那些数据的比较是本通信的目的。在这项研究中,发现由两种方法确定的双心室的线性二次剂量反应曲线有显著差异,尽管考虑了不同的靶尺寸。早些时候,X射线也发现了类似的问题。这种差异似乎不是由于FISH方法的技术困难造成的,FISH方法除了使用全染色体DNA探针外,还使用了泛质心DNA探针
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of γ-ray induced dicentric yields in human lymphocytes measured by conventional analysis and FISH

In an earlier work stable aberrations and dicentrics were determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) after various doses of 137Cs γ-rays. No corresponding calibration curve for dicentrics is available for determinations in terms of the conventional analysis as performed in our laboratory, In view of the potential for the application of chromosome painting to human biological dosimetry, it is desirable to determine such a calibration curve and this and the comparison of the resulting data to those obtained in terms of the FISH method is the objective of the present communication. In the study it is found that the linear-quadratic dose response curves for dicentrics, that are determined by the two methods, are significantly different, although the different target sizes are accounted for. A similar problem was found earlier for X-rays. It does not appear that the difference is due to technical difficulties in the FISH method, that has been improved by employing in addition to the whole chromosome DNA probes, a pan-centrometric DNA probe

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信