农业用地作为房地产商品:对北美城市边缘农田保护的启示

Michael F. Bunce
{"title":"农业用地作为房地产商品:对北美城市边缘农田保护的启示","authors":"Michael F. Bunce","doi":"10.1016/0304-3924(85)90059-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Land speculation and investment in the North American urban fringe has resulted in the persistent ownership of large tracts of agricultural land by non-agricultural and largely absentee interests. A study of the Toronto urban fringe indicates widespread alienation of landownership from farmers. Agriculture continues, but its stability is jeopardized by dependency on insecure land rental and by land fragmentation. The implications of this for farmland preservation policies in the urban fringe are examined. Landownership and tenure rather than land capability is seen as the key issue for the establishment of an effective policy. Ownership and tenure requires restructuring to create conditions which will ensure a stable and viable agricultural economy. Few jurisdictions have tackled the ownership issue. Most continue to rely on conventional landuse planning which is ill-equipped to neutralize a pro-development land owning pressure-group. The prospects for the permanent protection of farmland in many North American urban fringes are therefore poor.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100864,"journal":{"name":"Landscape Planning","volume":"12 2","pages":"Pages 177-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0304-3924(85)90059-0","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agricultural land as a real estate commodity: Implications for farmland preservation in the North American urban fringe\",\"authors\":\"Michael F. Bunce\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0304-3924(85)90059-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Land speculation and investment in the North American urban fringe has resulted in the persistent ownership of large tracts of agricultural land by non-agricultural and largely absentee interests. A study of the Toronto urban fringe indicates widespread alienation of landownership from farmers. Agriculture continues, but its stability is jeopardized by dependency on insecure land rental and by land fragmentation. The implications of this for farmland preservation policies in the urban fringe are examined. Landownership and tenure rather than land capability is seen as the key issue for the establishment of an effective policy. Ownership and tenure requires restructuring to create conditions which will ensure a stable and viable agricultural economy. Few jurisdictions have tackled the ownership issue. Most continue to rely on conventional landuse planning which is ill-equipped to neutralize a pro-development land owning pressure-group. The prospects for the permanent protection of farmland in many North American urban fringes are therefore poor.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Landscape Planning\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 177-192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0304-3924(85)90059-0\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Landscape Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304392485900590\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304392485900590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

北美城市边缘的土地投机和投资导致了非农业和基本上不存在的利益集团对大片农业用地的持续所有权。对多伦多城市边缘地带的一项研究表明,土地所有权普遍与农民脱节。农业仍在继续,但其稳定因依赖不安全的土地租赁和土地分割而受到危害。研究了这对城市边缘地区农田保护政策的影响。土地所有权和保有权而非土地能力被视为制定有效政策的关键问题。所有权和保有权需要进行重组,以创造条件,确保稳定和可行的农业经济。很少有司法管辖区处理所有权问题。大多数人继续依赖传统的土地利用规划,而传统的土地使用规划不足以抵消支持发展的土地拥有压力群体。因此,在北美许多城市边缘地区永久保护农田的前景并不乐观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Agricultural land as a real estate commodity: Implications for farmland preservation in the North American urban fringe

Land speculation and investment in the North American urban fringe has resulted in the persistent ownership of large tracts of agricultural land by non-agricultural and largely absentee interests. A study of the Toronto urban fringe indicates widespread alienation of landownership from farmers. Agriculture continues, but its stability is jeopardized by dependency on insecure land rental and by land fragmentation. The implications of this for farmland preservation policies in the urban fringe are examined. Landownership and tenure rather than land capability is seen as the key issue for the establishment of an effective policy. Ownership and tenure requires restructuring to create conditions which will ensure a stable and viable agricultural economy. Few jurisdictions have tackled the ownership issue. Most continue to rely on conventional landuse planning which is ill-equipped to neutralize a pro-development land owning pressure-group. The prospects for the permanent protection of farmland in many North American urban fringes are therefore poor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信