医生对吸烟者的检测:巴黎全科医学预防调查的多层次分析

Laurent Rigal , Hendy Abdoul , Hector Falcoff , Olivier Moncade , Marie-Josèphe Saurel-Cubizolles , Virginie Ringa
{"title":"医生对吸烟者的检测:巴黎全科医学预防调查的多层次分析","authors":"Laurent Rigal ,&nbsp;Hendy Abdoul ,&nbsp;Hector Falcoff ,&nbsp;Olivier Moncade ,&nbsp;Marie-Josèphe Saurel-Cubizolles ,&nbsp;Virginie Ringa","doi":"10.1016/j.lpmope.2021.100008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Although many studies have examined the mention of smoking status in case files, a more important issue in clinical practice is physicians’ ability to identify smokers. We sought to analyze physicians’ detection of smokers according to characteristics of patients (social especially) and physicians.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In 2005–2006, 59 randomly recruited general practitioners from the Paris metropolitan area enrolled every man aged 35–64 years seen during a two-week period. Physicians’ detection of smokers was analyzed in a logistic mixed model that considered patient (occupational class, education, income, and social integration) and physician (general demographics, practice organization, smoking control practices, personal smoking status) characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 1096 participating men, 35% smoked. The detection rate (55%) did not vary between physicians. Detection was better for men with low social integration (versus high or intermediate-high, OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->8.33, 95% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.23–31.1) and low income (&lt;<!--> <!-->1000 versus ≥<!--> <!-->3500<!--> <!-->€, OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.88, 95% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.00–8.25) and for physicians in practice for less than 20 years (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.43, 95% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.23–0.82) and ex-smokers (versus never-smoker, OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.97, 95% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.45–6.01), independently of patient age, physical activity, chronic disease and length of the patient-physician relationship.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The better detection observed for smokers at the bottom of the social scale and among newer physicians are positive factors that merit confirmation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100860,"journal":{"name":"La Presse Médicale Open","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100008"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.lpmope.2021.100008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physicians’ detection of smokers: A multilevel analysis of the Paris Prevention in General Practice survey\",\"authors\":\"Laurent Rigal ,&nbsp;Hendy Abdoul ,&nbsp;Hector Falcoff ,&nbsp;Olivier Moncade ,&nbsp;Marie-Josèphe Saurel-Cubizolles ,&nbsp;Virginie Ringa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lpmope.2021.100008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Although many studies have examined the mention of smoking status in case files, a more important issue in clinical practice is physicians’ ability to identify smokers. We sought to analyze physicians’ detection of smokers according to characteristics of patients (social especially) and physicians.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In 2005–2006, 59 randomly recruited general practitioners from the Paris metropolitan area enrolled every man aged 35–64 years seen during a two-week period. Physicians’ detection of smokers was analyzed in a logistic mixed model that considered patient (occupational class, education, income, and social integration) and physician (general demographics, practice organization, smoking control practices, personal smoking status) characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 1096 participating men, 35% smoked. The detection rate (55%) did not vary between physicians. Detection was better for men with low social integration (versus high or intermediate-high, OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->8.33, 95% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.23–31.1) and low income (&lt;<!--> <!-->1000 versus ≥<!--> <!-->3500<!--> <!-->€, OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.88, 95% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.00–8.25) and for physicians in practice for less than 20 years (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.43, 95% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.23–0.82) and ex-smokers (versus never-smoker, OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.97, 95% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.45–6.01), independently of patient age, physical activity, chronic disease and length of the patient-physician relationship.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The better detection observed for smokers at the bottom of the social scale and among newer physicians are positive factors that merit confirmation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"La Presse Médicale Open\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100008\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.lpmope.2021.100008\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"La Presse Médicale Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259025042100003X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"La Presse Médicale Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259025042100003X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管许多研究检查了病例档案中提到的吸烟状况,但临床实践中更重要的问题是医生识别吸烟者的能力。我们试图根据患者(尤其是社会)和医生的特征来分析医生对吸烟者的检测。方法2005-2006年,59名来自巴黎都会区的随机招募的全科医生在两周内招募了每名35-64岁的男性。在一个逻辑混合模型中分析了医生对吸烟者的检测,该模型考虑了患者(职业类别、教育、收入和社会融合)和医生(一般人口统计、实践组织、吸烟控制实践、个人吸烟状况)的特征。结果参与调查的1096名男性中,35%吸烟。不同医生的检测率(55%)没有差异。社会融合度低(与高或中高相比,or=8.33,95%CI=2.23-31)和低收入(<1000与≥3500欧元,or=2.88,95%CI=1.00-8.25)的男性,以及执业时间不到20年的医生(or=0.43,95%CI=0.23-0.82)和戒烟者(与从不吸烟者相比,or=2.97,95%CI=1.45-6.01),独立于患者年龄、身体活动、慢性病和医患关系的长度。结论在社会底层吸烟者和新医生中观察到的更好的检测是值得确认的积极因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physicians’ detection of smokers: A multilevel analysis of the Paris Prevention in General Practice survey

Objective

Although many studies have examined the mention of smoking status in case files, a more important issue in clinical practice is physicians’ ability to identify smokers. We sought to analyze physicians’ detection of smokers according to characteristics of patients (social especially) and physicians.

Methods

In 2005–2006, 59 randomly recruited general practitioners from the Paris metropolitan area enrolled every man aged 35–64 years seen during a two-week period. Physicians’ detection of smokers was analyzed in a logistic mixed model that considered patient (occupational class, education, income, and social integration) and physician (general demographics, practice organization, smoking control practices, personal smoking status) characteristics.

Results

Of the 1096 participating men, 35% smoked. The detection rate (55%) did not vary between physicians. Detection was better for men with low social integration (versus high or intermediate-high, OR = 8.33, 95% CI = 2.23–31.1) and low income (< 1000 versus ≥ 3500 €, OR = 2.88, 95% CI = 1.00–8.25) and for physicians in practice for less than 20 years (OR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.23–0.82) and ex-smokers (versus never-smoker, OR = 2.97, 95% CI = 1.45–6.01), independently of patient age, physical activity, chronic disease and length of the patient-physician relationship.

Conclusions

The better detection observed for smokers at the bottom of the social scale and among newer physicians are positive factors that merit confirmation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信