全球学习促进健康公平:对美国五个全球学习网站的调查。

Sonya S Shin, Ami Shah, Janette North-Kabore, Virginia Rowthorn, Kevin P Fiori, Ruth Dudding, Rev Alexander Plum, Dana M Parke, Carmen George, Stephen Thomas, Randal Pinkett, Keshia M Pollack Porter, Adam Sirois, Vera Cordeiro, Yolanda Ogbolu
{"title":"全球学习促进健康公平:对美国五个全球学习网站的调查。","authors":"Sonya S Shin, Ami Shah, Janette North-Kabore, Virginia Rowthorn, Kevin P Fiori, Ruth Dudding, Rev Alexander Plum, Dana M Parke, Carmen George, Stephen Thomas, Randal Pinkett, Keshia M Pollack Porter, Adam Sirois, Vera Cordeiro, Yolanda Ogbolu","doi":"10.1177/2752535X231210046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Global learning is the practice of adopting and adapting global ideas to local challenges. To advance the field of global learning, we performed a case study of five communities that had implemented global health models to advance health equity in a U.S. setting. Surveys were developed using a Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) framework, and each site completed surveys to characterize their global learning experience with respect to community context, the learning and implementation process, implementation science considerations, and health equity. The immense diversity of sites and their experiences underscored the heterogenous nature of global learning. Nonetheless, all cases highlighted core themes of addressing social determinants of health through strong community engagement. Cross-sector participation and implementation science evaluation were strategies applied by many but not all sites. We advocate for continued global learning that advances health equity and fosters equitable partnerships with mutual benefits to origination and destination sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":72648,"journal":{"name":"Community health equity research & policy","volume":" ","pages":"2752535X231210046"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Learning for Health Equity: A Survey of Five Global Learning Sites in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Sonya S Shin, Ami Shah, Janette North-Kabore, Virginia Rowthorn, Kevin P Fiori, Ruth Dudding, Rev Alexander Plum, Dana M Parke, Carmen George, Stephen Thomas, Randal Pinkett, Keshia M Pollack Porter, Adam Sirois, Vera Cordeiro, Yolanda Ogbolu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2752535X231210046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Global learning is the practice of adopting and adapting global ideas to local challenges. To advance the field of global learning, we performed a case study of five communities that had implemented global health models to advance health equity in a U.S. setting. Surveys were developed using a Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) framework, and each site completed surveys to characterize their global learning experience with respect to community context, the learning and implementation process, implementation science considerations, and health equity. The immense diversity of sites and their experiences underscored the heterogenous nature of global learning. Nonetheless, all cases highlighted core themes of addressing social determinants of health through strong community engagement. Cross-sector participation and implementation science evaluation were strategies applied by many but not all sites. We advocate for continued global learning that advances health equity and fosters equitable partnerships with mutual benefits to origination and destination sites.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community health equity research & policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2752535X231210046\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community health equity research & policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2752535X231210046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community health equity research & policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2752535X231210046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球学习是采用全球理念并使其适应当地挑战的实践。为了推进全球学习领域,我们对五个社区进行了案例研究,这些社区实施了全球健康模型,以促进美国环境中的健康公平。调查是使用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)框架进行的,每个站点都完成了调查,以描述其在社区背景、学习和实施过程、实施科学考虑因素和健康公平方面的全球学习经验。网站及其体验的巨大多样性凸显了全球学习的异质性。尽管如此,所有案例都突出了通过强有力的社区参与来解决健康的社会决定因素的核心主题。跨部门参与和实施科学评估是许多但并非所有地点采用的战略。我们倡导持续的全球学习,以促进健康公平,并促进公平的伙伴关系,使始发地和目的地互惠互利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global Learning for Health Equity: A Survey of Five Global Learning Sites in the United States.

Global learning is the practice of adopting and adapting global ideas to local challenges. To advance the field of global learning, we performed a case study of five communities that had implemented global health models to advance health equity in a U.S. setting. Surveys were developed using a Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) framework, and each site completed surveys to characterize their global learning experience with respect to community context, the learning and implementation process, implementation science considerations, and health equity. The immense diversity of sites and their experiences underscored the heterogenous nature of global learning. Nonetheless, all cases highlighted core themes of addressing social determinants of health through strong community engagement. Cross-sector participation and implementation science evaluation were strategies applied by many but not all sites. We advocate for continued global learning that advances health equity and fosters equitable partnerships with mutual benefits to origination and destination sites.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信