美国结构性种族主义对癌症死亡率影响的模拟建模的机遇、挑战和未来方向:范围界定综述。

Jinani Jayasekera, Safa El Kefi, Jessica R Fernandez, Kaitlyn M Wojcik, Jennifer M P Woo, Adaora Ezeani, Jennifer L Ish, Manami Bhattacharya, Kemi Ogunsina, Che-Jung Chang, Camryn M Cohen, Stephanie Ponce, Dalya Kamil, Julia Zhang, Randy Le, Amrita L Ramanathan, Gisela Butera, Christina Chapman, Shakira J Grant, Marquita W Lewis-Thames, Chiranjeev Dash, Traci N Bethea, Allana T Forde
{"title":"美国结构性种族主义对癌症死亡率影响的模拟建模的机遇、挑战和未来方向:范围界定综述。","authors":"Jinani Jayasekera, Safa El Kefi, Jessica R Fernandez, Kaitlyn M Wojcik, Jennifer M P Woo, Adaora Ezeani, Jennifer L Ish, Manami Bhattacharya, Kemi Ogunsina, Che-Jung Chang, Camryn M Cohen, Stephanie Ponce, Dalya Kamil, Julia Zhang, Randy Le, Amrita L Ramanathan, Gisela Butera, Christina Chapman, Shakira J Grant, Marquita W Lewis-Thames, Chiranjeev Dash, Traci N Bethea, Allana T Forde","doi":"10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Structural racism could contribute to racial and ethnic disparities in cancer mortality via its broad effects on housing, economic opportunities, and health care. However, there has been limited focus on incorporating structural racism into simulation models designed to identify practice and policy strategies to support health equity. We reviewed studies evaluating structural racism and cancer mortality disparities to highlight opportunities, challenges, and future directions to capture this broad concept in simulation modeling research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Scoping Review Extension guidelines. Articles published between 2018 and 2023 were searched including terms related to race, ethnicity, cancer-specific and all-cause mortality, and structural racism. We included studies evaluating the effects of structural racism on racial and ethnic disparities in cancer mortality in the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8345 articles were identified, and 183 articles were included. Studies used different measures, data sources, and methods. For example, in 20 studies, racial residential segregation, one component of structural racism, was measured by indices of dissimilarity, concentration at the extremes, redlining, or isolation. Data sources included cancer registries, claims, or institutional data linked to area-level metrics from the US census or historical mortgage data. Segregation was associated with worse survival. Nine studies were location specific, and the segregation measures were developed for Black, Hispanic, and White residents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A range of measures and data sources are available to capture the effects of structural racism. We provide a set of recommendations for best practices for modelers to consider when incorporating the effects of structural racism into simulation models.</p>","PeriodicalId":73988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10637025/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opportunities, challenges, and future directions for simulation modeling the effects of structural racism on cancer mortality in the United States: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Jinani Jayasekera, Safa El Kefi, Jessica R Fernandez, Kaitlyn M Wojcik, Jennifer M P Woo, Adaora Ezeani, Jennifer L Ish, Manami Bhattacharya, Kemi Ogunsina, Che-Jung Chang, Camryn M Cohen, Stephanie Ponce, Dalya Kamil, Julia Zhang, Randy Le, Amrita L Ramanathan, Gisela Butera, Christina Chapman, Shakira J Grant, Marquita W Lewis-Thames, Chiranjeev Dash, Traci N Bethea, Allana T Forde\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Structural racism could contribute to racial and ethnic disparities in cancer mortality via its broad effects on housing, economic opportunities, and health care. However, there has been limited focus on incorporating structural racism into simulation models designed to identify practice and policy strategies to support health equity. We reviewed studies evaluating structural racism and cancer mortality disparities to highlight opportunities, challenges, and future directions to capture this broad concept in simulation modeling research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Scoping Review Extension guidelines. Articles published between 2018 and 2023 were searched including terms related to race, ethnicity, cancer-specific and all-cause mortality, and structural racism. We included studies evaluating the effects of structural racism on racial and ethnic disparities in cancer mortality in the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8345 articles were identified, and 183 articles were included. Studies used different measures, data sources, and methods. For example, in 20 studies, racial residential segregation, one component of structural racism, was measured by indices of dissimilarity, concentration at the extremes, redlining, or isolation. Data sources included cancer registries, claims, or institutional data linked to area-level metrics from the US census or historical mortgage data. Segregation was associated with worse survival. Nine studies were location specific, and the segregation measures were developed for Black, Hispanic, and White residents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A range of measures and data sources are available to capture the effects of structural racism. We provide a set of recommendations for best practices for modelers to consider when incorporating the effects of structural racism into simulation models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10637025/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:结构性种族主义通过其对住房、经济机会和医疗保健的广泛影响,可能导致癌症死亡率的种族和民族差异。然而,将结构性种族主义纳入旨在确定支持卫生公平的实践和政策战略的模拟模型的关注有限。我们回顾了评估结构性种族主义和癌症死亡率差异的研究,以强调在模拟建模研究中捕捉这一广泛概念的机会、挑战和未来方向。方法:我们使用系统评价的首选报告项目和荟萃分析范围界定审查扩展指南。检索了2018年至2023年间发表的文章,包括与种族、民族、癌症特异性和全因死亡率以及结构性种族主义相关的术语。我们纳入了评估结构性种族主义对美国癌症死亡率种族和民族差异影响的研究。结果:共发现8345篇文章,纳入183篇文章。研究采用了不同的衡量标准、数据来源和方法。例如,在20项研究中,种族居住隔离是结构性种族主义的一个组成部分,是通过不同性、极端集中度、红线或隔离指数来衡量的。数据来源包括癌症登记、索赔或与美国人口普查或历史抵押贷款数据中的区域级别指标相关的机构数据。隔离与较差的生存率相关。九项研究针对特定地点,针对黑人、西班牙裔和白人居民制定了隔离措施。结论:有一系列措施和数据来源可用于捕捉结构性种族主义的影响。我们为建模人员在将结构性种族主义的影响纳入模拟模型时提供了一套最佳实践建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Opportunities, challenges, and future directions for simulation modeling the effects of structural racism on cancer mortality in the United States: a scoping review.

Purpose: Structural racism could contribute to racial and ethnic disparities in cancer mortality via its broad effects on housing, economic opportunities, and health care. However, there has been limited focus on incorporating structural racism into simulation models designed to identify practice and policy strategies to support health equity. We reviewed studies evaluating structural racism and cancer mortality disparities to highlight opportunities, challenges, and future directions to capture this broad concept in simulation modeling research.

Methods: We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Scoping Review Extension guidelines. Articles published between 2018 and 2023 were searched including terms related to race, ethnicity, cancer-specific and all-cause mortality, and structural racism. We included studies evaluating the effects of structural racism on racial and ethnic disparities in cancer mortality in the United States.

Results: A total of 8345 articles were identified, and 183 articles were included. Studies used different measures, data sources, and methods. For example, in 20 studies, racial residential segregation, one component of structural racism, was measured by indices of dissimilarity, concentration at the extremes, redlining, or isolation. Data sources included cancer registries, claims, or institutional data linked to area-level metrics from the US census or historical mortgage data. Segregation was associated with worse survival. Nine studies were location specific, and the segregation measures were developed for Black, Hispanic, and White residents.

Conclusions: A range of measures and data sources are available to capture the effects of structural racism. We provide a set of recommendations for best practices for modelers to consider when incorporating the effects of structural racism into simulation models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信