外伤性胸腰椎骨折患者的长短节段稳定治疗。

Q3 Medicine
Battugs Borkhuu, Batsaikhan Batochir, Munkhbayarlakh Sonomjamts, Erdembileg Tsevegmid, Naranbat Lkhagvasuren
{"title":"外伤性胸腰椎骨折患者的长短节段稳定治疗。","authors":"Battugs Borkhuu, Batsaikhan Batochir, Munkhbayarlakh Sonomjamts, Erdembileg Tsevegmid, Naranbat Lkhagvasuren","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0053.9344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Posterior stabilization surgery is considered the gold standard for restoring spine stability in patients with traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. However, whether long-segment (LS) stabilization or short-segment (SS) stabilization is an optimal approach for achieving more effective restoration of spinal stability remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients who underwent posterior stabilization surgery for traumatic thoracolumbar fractures were included in the study. Radiological parameters were measured using pre- and post-surgical thoracolumbar computed tomography (CT) scans and compared between patients who received LS and SS stabilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-eight consecutive patients (mean age 4414, 50% male) who underwent posterior stabilization surgery for traumatic thoracolumbar fractures were included. LS stabilization was performed in 52 patients, while SS stabilization was performed in 46 patients. Among spinal stability parameters measured on pre-surgical thoracolumbar CT scans, the anterior vertebral height (AVH) was significantly lower in the LS stabilization group compared to the SS stabilization group (14.44.0 mm vs. 16.44.0 mm, p=0.017), indicating a more severe compression fracture in the LS stabilization group. However, all parameters improved on post-surgical thoracolumbar CT scans, and there were no significant differences between LS stabilization and SS stabilization groups in terms of the restoration of spinal stability parameters. The type of stabilization (LS vs. SS stabilization) did not show an association with post-surgical measurements of spinal stability parameters (B=0.27, 95% CI -1.87 to 2.42, p=0.800 for superior inferior end plate angle (SIEA), B=0.20, 95% CI -1.33 to 1.74, p=0.796 for AVH, and B=0.39, 95% CI -1.72 to 2.50, p=0.714 for Cobb angle).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both LS and SS stabilization approaches yield similar results in terms of restoring spine stability parameters in patients with traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. The choice of surgical approach should be individualized based on the patient's overall status and the surgeon's experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":19622,"journal":{"name":"Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja","volume":"25 4","pages":"173-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long Versus Short-segment Stabilization in Patients with Traumatic Thoracolumbar Fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Battugs Borkhuu, Batsaikhan Batochir, Munkhbayarlakh Sonomjamts, Erdembileg Tsevegmid, Naranbat Lkhagvasuren\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0053.9344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Posterior stabilization surgery is considered the gold standard for restoring spine stability in patients with traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. However, whether long-segment (LS) stabilization or short-segment (SS) stabilization is an optimal approach for achieving more effective restoration of spinal stability remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients who underwent posterior stabilization surgery for traumatic thoracolumbar fractures were included in the study. Radiological parameters were measured using pre- and post-surgical thoracolumbar computed tomography (CT) scans and compared between patients who received LS and SS stabilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-eight consecutive patients (mean age 4414, 50% male) who underwent posterior stabilization surgery for traumatic thoracolumbar fractures were included. LS stabilization was performed in 52 patients, while SS stabilization was performed in 46 patients. Among spinal stability parameters measured on pre-surgical thoracolumbar CT scans, the anterior vertebral height (AVH) was significantly lower in the LS stabilization group compared to the SS stabilization group (14.44.0 mm vs. 16.44.0 mm, p=0.017), indicating a more severe compression fracture in the LS stabilization group. However, all parameters improved on post-surgical thoracolumbar CT scans, and there were no significant differences between LS stabilization and SS stabilization groups in terms of the restoration of spinal stability parameters. The type of stabilization (LS vs. SS stabilization) did not show an association with post-surgical measurements of spinal stability parameters (B=0.27, 95% CI -1.87 to 2.42, p=0.800 for superior inferior end plate angle (SIEA), B=0.20, 95% CI -1.33 to 1.74, p=0.796 for AVH, and B=0.39, 95% CI -1.72 to 2.50, p=0.714 for Cobb angle).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both LS and SS stabilization approaches yield similar results in terms of restoring spine stability parameters in patients with traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. The choice of surgical approach should be individualized based on the patient's overall status and the surgeon's experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"173-179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.9344\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.9344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:后部稳定手术被认为是恢复创伤胸腰椎骨折患者脊柱稳定性的黄金标准。然而,长节段(LS)稳定还是短节段(SS)稳定是实现更有效恢复脊柱稳定性的最佳方法仍不清楚。材料和方法:本研究纳入了因外伤性胸腰椎骨折而接受后路稳定手术的患者。使用术前和术后胸腰椎计算机断层扫描(CT)测量放射参数,并在接受LS和SS稳定的患者之间进行比较。结果:98例连续患者(平均年龄4414岁,50%为男性)因外伤性胸腰椎骨折接受了后路稳定手术。LS稳定治疗52例,SS稳定治疗46例。在术前胸腰椎CT扫描测量的脊柱稳定性参数中,与SS稳定组相比,LS稳定组的前椎骨高度(AVH)显著降低(14.44.0 mm对16.44.0 mm,p=0.017),表明LS稳定组存在更严重的压缩性骨折。然而,术后胸腰椎CT扫描的所有参数都有所改善,LS稳定组和SS稳定组在脊柱稳定性参数的恢复方面没有显著差异。稳定类型(LS与SS稳定)与脊柱稳定性参数的术后测量值无关(B=0.27,95%CI-1.87至2.42,上下终板角(SIEA)p=0.800,B=0.20,95%CI-1.033至1.74,AVH p=0.796,B=0.39,95%CI 1.72至2.50,Cobb角p=0.714)。结论:LS和SS稳定方法在创伤胸腰椎骨折患者恢复脊柱稳定性参数方面产生了相似的结果。手术方法的选择应根据患者的整体状况和外科医生的经验进行个性化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long Versus Short-segment Stabilization in Patients with Traumatic Thoracolumbar Fractures.

Background: Posterior stabilization surgery is considered the gold standard for restoring spine stability in patients with traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. However, whether long-segment (LS) stabilization or short-segment (SS) stabilization is an optimal approach for achieving more effective restoration of spinal stability remains unclear.

Material and methods: Patients who underwent posterior stabilization surgery for traumatic thoracolumbar fractures were included in the study. Radiological parameters were measured using pre- and post-surgical thoracolumbar computed tomography (CT) scans and compared between patients who received LS and SS stabilization.

Results: Ninety-eight consecutive patients (mean age 4414, 50% male) who underwent posterior stabilization surgery for traumatic thoracolumbar fractures were included. LS stabilization was performed in 52 patients, while SS stabilization was performed in 46 patients. Among spinal stability parameters measured on pre-surgical thoracolumbar CT scans, the anterior vertebral height (AVH) was significantly lower in the LS stabilization group compared to the SS stabilization group (14.44.0 mm vs. 16.44.0 mm, p=0.017), indicating a more severe compression fracture in the LS stabilization group. However, all parameters improved on post-surgical thoracolumbar CT scans, and there were no significant differences between LS stabilization and SS stabilization groups in terms of the restoration of spinal stability parameters. The type of stabilization (LS vs. SS stabilization) did not show an association with post-surgical measurements of spinal stability parameters (B=0.27, 95% CI -1.87 to 2.42, p=0.800 for superior inferior end plate angle (SIEA), B=0.20, 95% CI -1.33 to 1.74, p=0.796 for AVH, and B=0.39, 95% CI -1.72 to 2.50, p=0.714 for Cobb angle).

Conclusions: Both LS and SS stabilization approaches yield similar results in terms of restoring spine stability parameters in patients with traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. The choice of surgical approach should be individualized based on the patient's overall status and the surgeon's experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja
Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信