苏必利尔湖农村癌症护理 项目

Thomas E. Elliott md , Barbara A. Elliott ph d, Ronald R. Regal ph d, Colleen M. Renier bs , Byron J. Crouse md , David E. Gangeness pharm d, Martha T. Witrak rn, ph d, Patricia B. Jensen med, rn, cs
{"title":"苏必利尔湖农村癌症护理 项目","authors":"Thomas E. Elliott \n md\n ,&nbsp;Barbara A. Elliott \n ph\n\t\t\t\t\t\td,&nbsp;Ronald R. Regal \n ph\n\t\t\t\t\t\td,&nbsp;Colleen M. Renier \n bs\n ,&nbsp;Byron J. Crouse \n md\n ,&nbsp;David E. Gangeness \n pharm\n\t\t\t\t\t\td,&nbsp;Martha T. Witrak \n rn, ph\n\t\t\t\t\t\td,&nbsp;Patricia B. Jensen \n med, \n\t\t\t\t\t\trn, \n\t\t\t\t\t\tcs","doi":"10.1111/j.1523-5394.2001.91007.pp.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b><span>Purpose:</span></b> The purpose of this article is to report the main learning outcomes of the Lake Superior Rural Cancer Care Project.</p><p><b><span>Description of Study:</span></b> The authors designed and tested a multimodal intervention directed at rural providers and their healthcare systems in a large rural area in the north central United States. An experimental design was used to randomize rural providers at the group level. The intervention consisted of providing increased education for rural providers with a number of approaches, including the use of clinical opinion leaders. The main outcome of the intervention was knowledge scoring on discipline-specific cancer management tests.</p><p><b><span>Results:</span></b> Knowledge scores for providers in the experimental group significantly increased from pretest to post-test: 66 to 79 for physicians (and physician assistants) (<i>P</i> = .02); 58 to 71 for nurses (<i>P</i> = .01); and 54 to 64 for pharmacists (<i>P</i> = .01). At post-test, participating providers in the experimental group performed significantly better on the knowledge tests (<i>P</i> &lt; .01) than those in the control groups.</p><p><b><span>Clinical Implications:</span></b> This study may be the first to test educational interventions to improve rural providers' knowledge about cancer practice using an experimental design. The intervention may possibly change provider practice behaviors and, thus, patient outcomes, data that will be reported in a future issue. Finally, this educational intervention may prove useful for providers in other rural areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":79323,"journal":{"name":"Cancer practice","volume":"9 1","pages":"37-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1523-5394.2001.91007.pp.x","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lake Superior Rural Cancer Care Project\",\"authors\":\"Thomas E. Elliott \\n md\\n ,&nbsp;Barbara A. Elliott \\n ph\\n\\t\\t\\t\\t\\t\\td,&nbsp;Ronald R. Regal \\n ph\\n\\t\\t\\t\\t\\t\\td,&nbsp;Colleen M. Renier \\n bs\\n ,&nbsp;Byron J. Crouse \\n md\\n ,&nbsp;David E. Gangeness \\n pharm\\n\\t\\t\\t\\t\\t\\td,&nbsp;Martha T. Witrak \\n rn, ph\\n\\t\\t\\t\\t\\t\\td,&nbsp;Patricia B. Jensen \\n med, \\n\\t\\t\\t\\t\\t\\trn, \\n\\t\\t\\t\\t\\t\\tcs\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1523-5394.2001.91007.pp.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b><span>Purpose:</span></b> The purpose of this article is to report the main learning outcomes of the Lake Superior Rural Cancer Care Project.</p><p><b><span>Description of Study:</span></b> The authors designed and tested a multimodal intervention directed at rural providers and their healthcare systems in a large rural area in the north central United States. An experimental design was used to randomize rural providers at the group level. The intervention consisted of providing increased education for rural providers with a number of approaches, including the use of clinical opinion leaders. The main outcome of the intervention was knowledge scoring on discipline-specific cancer management tests.</p><p><b><span>Results:</span></b> Knowledge scores for providers in the experimental group significantly increased from pretest to post-test: 66 to 79 for physicians (and physician assistants) (<i>P</i> = .02); 58 to 71 for nurses (<i>P</i> = .01); and 54 to 64 for pharmacists (<i>P</i> = .01). At post-test, participating providers in the experimental group performed significantly better on the knowledge tests (<i>P</i> &lt; .01) than those in the control groups.</p><p><b><span>Clinical Implications:</span></b> This study may be the first to test educational interventions to improve rural providers' knowledge about cancer practice using an experimental design. The intervention may possibly change provider practice behaviors and, thus, patient outcomes, data that will be reported in a future issue. Finally, this educational intervention may prove useful for providers in other rural areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer practice\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"37-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1523-5394.2001.91007.pp.x\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1523-5394.2001.91007.pp.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1523-5394.2001.91007.pp.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文旨在报告苏必利尔湖癌症农村医疗项目的主要学习成果。研究描述:作者设计并测试了一种针对美国中北部一个大型农村地区农村医疗机构及其医疗系统的多模式干预。实验设计用于在组水平上随机化农村提供者。干预措施包括通过多种方法,包括使用临床意见领袖,为农村提供者提供更多的教育。干预的主要结果是在特定学科的癌症管理测试中进行知识评分。结果:从测试前到测试后,实验组提供者的知识得分显著增加:医生(和医生助理)的知识得分为66至79(P=0.02);护士为58~71(P=0.01);药剂师为54至64(P=.01)。在测试后,实验组的参与提供者在知识测试中的表现明显好于对照组(P<;.01)。临床意义:这项研究可能是第一次通过实验设计测试教育干预措施,以提高农村提供者对癌症实践的了解。干预可能会改变提供者的实践行为,从而改变患者的结果,并在未来的问题中报告数据。最后,这种教育干预措施可能对其他农村地区的教育提供者有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lake Superior Rural Cancer Care Project

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to report the main learning outcomes of the Lake Superior Rural Cancer Care Project.

Description of Study: The authors designed and tested a multimodal intervention directed at rural providers and their healthcare systems in a large rural area in the north central United States. An experimental design was used to randomize rural providers at the group level. The intervention consisted of providing increased education for rural providers with a number of approaches, including the use of clinical opinion leaders. The main outcome of the intervention was knowledge scoring on discipline-specific cancer management tests.

Results: Knowledge scores for providers in the experimental group significantly increased from pretest to post-test: 66 to 79 for physicians (and physician assistants) (P = .02); 58 to 71 for nurses (P = .01); and 54 to 64 for pharmacists (P = .01). At post-test, participating providers in the experimental group performed significantly better on the knowledge tests (P < .01) than those in the control groups.

Clinical Implications: This study may be the first to test educational interventions to improve rural providers' knowledge about cancer practice using an experimental design. The intervention may possibly change provider practice behaviors and, thus, patient outcomes, data that will be reported in a future issue. Finally, this educational intervention may prove useful for providers in other rural areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信