1996年经济间谍法研讨会:专家圆桌会议

Stephen Miller
{"title":"1996年经济间谍法研讨会:专家圆桌会议","authors":"Stephen Miller","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1520-6386(199723)8:3<32::AID-CIR9>3.0.CO;2-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The language of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (EEA) is often broad, with many “gray areas” left unresolved. Below, we have excerpted remarks from panel discussions featuring attorneys who specialize in trade secrets law, including those involved in drafting and enforcing the legislation. The discussion took place last February as part of the SCIP symposium on the ramifications of the EEA, held at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. These off-the-cuff discussion remarks are intended for informational purposes only and are not intended to convey legal advice on specific matters.</p>","PeriodicalId":100295,"journal":{"name":"Competitive Intelligence Review","volume":"8 3","pages":"32-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6386(199723)8:3<32::AID-CIR9>3.0.CO;2-1","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Symposium the economic Espionage Act of 1996: An expert roundtable\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1520-6386(199723)8:3<32::AID-CIR9>3.0.CO;2-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The language of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (EEA) is often broad, with many “gray areas” left unresolved. Below, we have excerpted remarks from panel discussions featuring attorneys who specialize in trade secrets law, including those involved in drafting and enforcing the legislation. The discussion took place last February as part of the SCIP symposium on the ramifications of the EEA, held at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. These off-the-cuff discussion remarks are intended for informational purposes only and are not intended to convey legal advice on specific matters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Competitive Intelligence Review\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"32-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6386(199723)8:3<32::AID-CIR9>3.0.CO;2-1\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Competitive Intelligence Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291520-6386%28199723%298%3A3%3C32%3A%3AAID-CIR9%3E3.0.CO%3B2-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competitive Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291520-6386%28199723%298%3A3%3C32%3A%3AAID-CIR9%3E3.0.CO%3B2-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1996年《经济间谍法》(EEA)的措辞通常很宽泛,许多“灰色地带”仍未解决。下面,我们摘录了专门研究商业秘密法的律师,包括参与起草和执行该法律的律师的小组讨论中的言论。该讨论于去年2月在华盛顿特区乔治敦大学举行,是SCIP关于欧洲经济区影响的研讨会的一部分。这些非正式讨论仅用于提供信息,不用于传达有关具体事项的法律建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Symposium the economic Espionage Act of 1996: An expert roundtable

The language of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (EEA) is often broad, with many “gray areas” left unresolved. Below, we have excerpted remarks from panel discussions featuring attorneys who specialize in trade secrets law, including those involved in drafting and enforcing the legislation. The discussion took place last February as part of the SCIP symposium on the ramifications of the EEA, held at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. These off-the-cuff discussion remarks are intended for informational purposes only and are not intended to convey legal advice on specific matters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信