衡量向他人学习:主动社会非正式学习问卷的编制和验证

IF 1.5 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Samantha Crans MSc, Dominik Froehlich PhD, Mien Segers PhD, Simon Beausaert PhD
{"title":"衡量向他人学习:主动社会非正式学习问卷的编制和验证","authors":"Samantha Crans MSc,&nbsp;Dominik Froehlich PhD,&nbsp;Mien Segers PhD,&nbsp;Simon Beausaert PhD","doi":"10.1111/ijtd.12310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present study aims to develop, validate, and cross-validate an instrument measuring three proactive social informal learning activities, namely feedback seeking, help seeking and information seeking. Prior research mainly focused on detecting or measuring the frequency of these seeking behaviours and did not consider whether the information, help or feedback that has been sought was also used. Furthermore, although these seeking behaviours were studied extensively in different research fields, the current study takes a learning perspective and interprets feedback, help and information seeking as learning activities. The questionnaire was completed by a convenient sample of 650 professionals working in higher education, consultancy, retail and food production. We performed an exploratory factor analysis (<i>N</i> = 230 educators) to explore the structure of the questionnaire. This was followed by a confirmatory factor analysis (<i>N</i> = 230 educators) to confirm the structure. Finally, we cross-validated the questionnaire in a sample of business professionals (<i>N</i> = 190) by testing for measurement invariance. The final questionnaire resulted in a five-factor structure measuring the (1) <i>Use of Feedback Seeking</i>, (2) <i>Frequency of Help and Information Seeking</i>, (3) <i>Use of Help seeking</i>, (4) <i>Use of Information Seeking and</i> (5) <i>Frequency of Feedback Seeking</i>. The current study presents a preliminary, yet promising instrument that taps into proactive social informal learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":46817,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Training and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring learning from others: The development and validation of the Proactive Social Informal Learning Questionnaire\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Crans MSc,&nbsp;Dominik Froehlich PhD,&nbsp;Mien Segers PhD,&nbsp;Simon Beausaert PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijtd.12310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The present study aims to develop, validate, and cross-validate an instrument measuring three proactive social informal learning activities, namely feedback seeking, help seeking and information seeking. Prior research mainly focused on detecting or measuring the frequency of these seeking behaviours and did not consider whether the information, help or feedback that has been sought was also used. Furthermore, although these seeking behaviours were studied extensively in different research fields, the current study takes a learning perspective and interprets feedback, help and information seeking as learning activities. The questionnaire was completed by a convenient sample of 650 professionals working in higher education, consultancy, retail and food production. We performed an exploratory factor analysis (<i>N</i> = 230 educators) to explore the structure of the questionnaire. This was followed by a confirmatory factor analysis (<i>N</i> = 230 educators) to confirm the structure. Finally, we cross-validated the questionnaire in a sample of business professionals (<i>N</i> = 190) by testing for measurement invariance. The final questionnaire resulted in a five-factor structure measuring the (1) <i>Use of Feedback Seeking</i>, (2) <i>Frequency of Help and Information Seeking</i>, (3) <i>Use of Help seeking</i>, (4) <i>Use of Information Seeking and</i> (5) <i>Frequency of Feedback Seeking</i>. The current study presents a preliminary, yet promising instrument that taps into proactive social informal learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Training and Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Training and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijtd.12310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Training and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijtd.12310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在开发、验证和交叉验证一种测量三种积极主动的社会非正式学习活动的工具,即寻求反馈、寻求帮助和寻求信息。先前的研究主要集中在检测或测量这些寻求行为的频率,而没有考虑是否也使用了所寻求的信息、帮助或反馈。此外,尽管在不同的研究领域对这些寻求行为进行了广泛的研究,但目前的研究从学习的角度出发,将反馈、帮助和信息寻求解释为学习活动。问卷由650名从事高等教育、咨询、零售和食品生产的专业人士组成。我们进行了探索性因素分析(N = 230名教育工作者)来探究问卷的结构。随后进行了验证性因素分析(N = 230名教育工作者)来确认结构。最后,我们在商业专业人士样本中交叉验证了问卷(N = 190)通过测试测量不变性。最后的问卷形成了一个五因素结构,测量了(1)反馈寻求的使用,(2)帮助和信息寻求的频率,(3)帮助寻求的使用、(4)信息寻求的使用和(5)反馈寻求频率。目前的研究提供了一个初步但有前景的工具,可以利用主动的社会非正式学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Measuring learning from others: The development and validation of the Proactive Social Informal Learning Questionnaire

Measuring learning from others: The development and validation of the Proactive Social Informal Learning Questionnaire

The present study aims to develop, validate, and cross-validate an instrument measuring three proactive social informal learning activities, namely feedback seeking, help seeking and information seeking. Prior research mainly focused on detecting or measuring the frequency of these seeking behaviours and did not consider whether the information, help or feedback that has been sought was also used. Furthermore, although these seeking behaviours were studied extensively in different research fields, the current study takes a learning perspective and interprets feedback, help and information seeking as learning activities. The questionnaire was completed by a convenient sample of 650 professionals working in higher education, consultancy, retail and food production. We performed an exploratory factor analysis (N = 230 educators) to explore the structure of the questionnaire. This was followed by a confirmatory factor analysis (N = 230 educators) to confirm the structure. Finally, we cross-validated the questionnaire in a sample of business professionals (N = 190) by testing for measurement invariance. The final questionnaire resulted in a five-factor structure measuring the (1) Use of Feedback Seeking, (2) Frequency of Help and Information Seeking, (3) Use of Help seeking, (4) Use of Information Seeking and (5) Frequency of Feedback Seeking. The current study presents a preliminary, yet promising instrument that taps into proactive social informal learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Increasing international competition has led governments and corporations to focus on ways of improving national and corporate economic performance. The effective use of human resources is seen as a prerequisite, and the training and development of employees as paramount. The growth of training and development as an academic subject reflects its growth in practice. The International Journal of Training and Development is an international forum for the reporting of high-quality, original, empirical research. Multidisciplinary, international and comparative, the journal publishes research which ranges from the theoretical, conceptual and methodological to more policy-oriented types of work. The scope of the Journal is training and development, broadly defined. This includes: The determinants of training specifying and testing the explanatory variables which may be related to training identifying and analysing specific factors which give rise to a need for training and development as well as the processes by which those needs become defined, for example, training needs analysis the need for performance improvement the training and development implications of various performance improvement techniques, such as appraisal and assessment the analysis of competence Training and development practice the design, development and delivery of training the learning and development process itself competency-based approaches evaluation: the relationship between training and individual, corporate and macroeconomic performance Policy and strategy organisational aspects of training and development public policy issues questions of infrastructure issues relating to the training and development profession The Journal’s scope encompasses both corporate and public policy analysis. International and comparative work is particularly welcome, as is research which embraces emerging issues and developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信