少数(处理过的)集群的野生引导

IF 2.9 4区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
James G. MacKinnon, Matthew D. Webb
{"title":"少数(处理过的)集群的野生引导","authors":"James G. MacKinnon,&nbsp;Matthew D. Webb","doi":"10.1111/ectj.12107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Inference based on cluster-robust standard errors in linear regression models, using either the Student's <i>t</i>-distribution or the wild cluster bootstrap, is known to fail when the number of treated clusters is very small. We propose a family of new procedures called the subcluster wild bootstrap, which includes the ordinary wild bootstrap as a limiting case. In the case of pure treatment models, where all observations within clusters are either treated or not, the latter procedure can work remarkably well. The key requirement is that all cluster sizes, regardless of treatment, should be similar. Unfortunately, the analogue of this requirement is not likely to hold for difference-in-differences regressions. Our theoretical results are supported by extensive simulations and an empirical example.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50555,"journal":{"name":"Econometrics Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/ectj.12107","citationCount":"146","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The wild bootstrap for few (treated) clusters\",\"authors\":\"James G. MacKinnon,&nbsp;Matthew D. Webb\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ectj.12107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Inference based on cluster-robust standard errors in linear regression models, using either the Student's <i>t</i>-distribution or the wild cluster bootstrap, is known to fail when the number of treated clusters is very small. We propose a family of new procedures called the subcluster wild bootstrap, which includes the ordinary wild bootstrap as a limiting case. In the case of pure treatment models, where all observations within clusters are either treated or not, the latter procedure can work remarkably well. The key requirement is that all cluster sizes, regardless of treatment, should be similar. Unfortunately, the analogue of this requirement is not likely to hold for difference-in-differences regressions. Our theoretical results are supported by extensive simulations and an empirical example.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Econometrics Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/ectj.12107\",\"citationCount\":\"146\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Econometrics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ectj.12107\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometrics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ectj.12107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 146

摘要

已知,当处理的聚类数量非常少时,使用Student t分布或野生聚类自举,在线性回归模型中基于聚类鲁棒标准误差的推断会失败。我们提出了一系列新的程序,称为亚簇野生自举,其中包括普通野生自举作为限制性情况。在纯处理模型的情况下,集群内的所有观察结果要么被处理,要么不被处理,后一种程序可以非常好地工作。关键要求是,无论治疗如何,所有集群大小都应相似。不幸的是,这一要求的相似性不太可能适用于差异回归。我们的理论结果得到了大量模拟和实证的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The wild bootstrap for few (treated) clusters

Inference based on cluster-robust standard errors in linear regression models, using either the Student's t-distribution or the wild cluster bootstrap, is known to fail when the number of treated clusters is very small. We propose a family of new procedures called the subcluster wild bootstrap, which includes the ordinary wild bootstrap as a limiting case. In the case of pure treatment models, where all observations within clusters are either treated or not, the latter procedure can work remarkably well. The key requirement is that all cluster sizes, regardless of treatment, should be similar. Unfortunately, the analogue of this requirement is not likely to hold for difference-in-differences regressions. Our theoretical results are supported by extensive simulations and an empirical example.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Econometrics Journal
Econometrics Journal 管理科学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Econometrics Journal was established in 1998 by the Royal Economic Society with the aim of creating a top international field journal for the publication of econometric research with a standard of intellectual rigour and academic standing similar to those of the pre-existing top field journals in econometrics. The Econometrics Journal is committed to publishing first-class papers in macro-, micro- and financial econometrics. It is a general journal for econometric research open to all areas of econometrics, whether applied, computational, methodological or theoretical contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信