“现代”麻醉技术的历史——一次关键性的重新评价

Q3 Arts and Humanities
M. Wulf M. Strätling
{"title":"“现代”麻醉技术的历史——一次关键性的重新评价","authors":"M. Wulf M. Strätling","doi":"10.1016/j.janh.2020.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper is the first in a series of publications. These investigate, whether important elements of the historiography of anesthesia require a critical reappraisal. A systematic, combined presentation, contextualization and assessment of recent European research is provided. This includes the author's own findings. These emanate from two extensive projects. They combine very recent findings with results of earlier research, conducted by the author and numerous collaborators over the last 18 years. The findings represent an ever increasing and ever more robust body of evidence. They add an important <em>new</em> element to our international historiography. As an introduction, several definitions will be given for criteria, which designate “modern” anesthesia and its technology. On one of these criteria, the history of <em>professionalization</em> and <em>specialization,</em> a short overview will be given. This will be followed by an overview of <em>general</em> contexts, key features and early achievements of anesthesia-related <em>technology.</em> All results will be compared with a currently dominating narrative: This alleges “dominance” of US-American and British pioneers and developments. Apparent biases and inconsistencies are identified. These suggest that our current, international historiography of anesthesia may require a critical reassessment. Three subsequent articles will focus on <em>specific</em> aspects of anesthesia technique and technology. Their results likewise suggest a history of internationalism and trans-disciplinary reciprocity, rather than of national dominances. Further investigations will aim to ascertain the nature and extent of potential interactions, which may nowadays be underrecognized.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.janh.2020.06.001","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The history of “modern” anesthesia technology - A critical reappraisal\",\"authors\":\"M. Wulf M. Strätling\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.janh.2020.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper is the first in a series of publications. These investigate, whether important elements of the historiography of anesthesia require a critical reappraisal. A systematic, combined presentation, contextualization and assessment of recent European research is provided. This includes the author's own findings. These emanate from two extensive projects. They combine very recent findings with results of earlier research, conducted by the author and numerous collaborators over the last 18 years. The findings represent an ever increasing and ever more robust body of evidence. They add an important <em>new</em> element to our international historiography. As an introduction, several definitions will be given for criteria, which designate “modern” anesthesia and its technology. On one of these criteria, the history of <em>professionalization</em> and <em>specialization,</em> a short overview will be given. This will be followed by an overview of <em>general</em> contexts, key features and early achievements of anesthesia-related <em>technology.</em> All results will be compared with a currently dominating narrative: This alleges “dominance” of US-American and British pioneers and developments. Apparent biases and inconsistencies are identified. These suggest that our current, international historiography of anesthesia may require a critical reassessment. Three subsequent articles will focus on <em>specific</em> aspects of anesthesia technique and technology. Their results likewise suggest a history of internationalism and trans-disciplinary reciprocity, rather than of national dominances. Further investigations will aim to ascertain the nature and extent of potential interactions, which may nowadays be underrecognized.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anesthesia History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.janh.2020.06.001\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anesthesia History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352452918300574\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352452918300574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

这篇论文是一系列出版物中的第一篇。这些调查,是否需要对麻醉史学的重要元素进行批判性的重新评估。对最近的欧洲研究进行了系统、综合的介绍、背景分析和评估。这包括作者自己的发现。这源于两个广泛的项目。他们将最近的发现与作者和众多合作者在过去18年中进行的早期研究结果相结合。这些发现代表了越来越多、越来越有力的证据。它们为我们的国际史学增添了一个重要的新元素。作为引言,将给出几个标准的定义,这些标准指定了“现代”麻醉及其技术。关于其中一个标准,即职业化和专业化的历史,我们将简要介绍一下。接下来将概述麻醉相关技术的一般背景、关键特征和早期成就。所有结果都将与目前占主导地位的叙事进行比较:这声称美国和英国的先驱和发展具有“主导地位”。发现明显的偏差和不一致。这表明,我们目前的国际麻醉史学可能需要进行批判性的重新评估。随后的三篇文章将集中讨论麻醉技术和技术的具体方面。他们的研究结果同样表明了国际主义和跨学科互惠的历史,而不是国家统治的历史。进一步的调查将旨在确定潜在相互作用的性质和程度,而这些相互作用现在可能被低估了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The history of “modern” anesthesia technology - A critical reappraisal

This paper is the first in a series of publications. These investigate, whether important elements of the historiography of anesthesia require a critical reappraisal. A systematic, combined presentation, contextualization and assessment of recent European research is provided. This includes the author's own findings. These emanate from two extensive projects. They combine very recent findings with results of earlier research, conducted by the author and numerous collaborators over the last 18 years. The findings represent an ever increasing and ever more robust body of evidence. They add an important new element to our international historiography. As an introduction, several definitions will be given for criteria, which designate “modern” anesthesia and its technology. On one of these criteria, the history of professionalization and specialization, a short overview will be given. This will be followed by an overview of general contexts, key features and early achievements of anesthesia-related technology. All results will be compared with a currently dominating narrative: This alleges “dominance” of US-American and British pioneers and developments. Apparent biases and inconsistencies are identified. These suggest that our current, international historiography of anesthesia may require a critical reassessment. Three subsequent articles will focus on specific aspects of anesthesia technique and technology. Their results likewise suggest a history of internationalism and trans-disciplinary reciprocity, rather than of national dominances. Further investigations will aim to ascertain the nature and extent of potential interactions, which may nowadays be underrecognized.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Anesthesia History
Journal of Anesthesia History Arts and Humanities-History and Philosophy of Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anesthesia History (ISSN 2352-4529) is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to advancing the study of anesthesia history and related disciplines. The Journal addresses anesthesia history from antiquity to the present. Its wide scope includes the history of perioperative care, pain medicine, critical care medicine, physician and nurse practices of anesthesia, equipment, drugs, and prominent individuals. The Journal serves a diverse audience of physicians, nurses, dentists, clinicians, historians, educators, researchers and academicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信