人原发性慢性伤口源性成纤维细胞在成纤维细胞特异性标记物的表达、细胞周期阻滞和增殖减少方面表现出不同的模式

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
P. Monika , M.N. Chandraprabha , K.N. Chidambara Murthy , Annapoorni Rangarajan , P. Veena Waiker , M. Sathish
{"title":"人原发性慢性伤口源性成纤维细胞在成纤维细胞特异性标记物的表达、细胞周期阻滞和增殖减少方面表现出不同的模式","authors":"P. Monika ,&nbsp;M.N. Chandraprabha ,&nbsp;K.N. Chidambara Murthy ,&nbsp;Annapoorni Rangarajan ,&nbsp;P. Veena Waiker ,&nbsp;M. Sathish","doi":"10.1016/j.yexmp.2022.104803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Although wound refers to simple cut in the skin, most wounds don't heal because of the various local and systemic factors that lead to its complexity and chronicity. Thus, prior understanding of the status of the wound is necessary and methods that can differentiate between the healing and non-healing wounds at a much earlier stage is crucial for a successful </span>treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The current study aims at differentiating Acute Wound Fibroblasts (AWFs) and Chronic Wound Fibroblasts (CWFs) based on differential expression of fibroblast specific markers such as Vimentin<span> and Alpha Smooth Muscle Actin (α-SMA) and compare its cell cycle and proliferation.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Immunostaining<span><span> and western blotting<span> analysis showed that, AWFs and CWFs differentially expressed vimentin and α-SMA, with AWFs and CWFs showing higher expression of vimentin and α-SMA respectively. AWFs showed higher distributions in G0/G1 (67.43% vs. 62.16%), S phase (22.61% vs. 8.51%) compared to CWFs. However, AWFs showed decreased distributions compared to CWFs in G2 + M phase (8.14% vs. 10.6%). Thus, it was observed that CWFs showed </span></span>cell cycle arrest<span> in the G1/G0 phase and inhibited DNA synthesis<span>, which was further confirmed by reduced proliferation of CWFs. We suggest that, differential expression of the cell specific markers can be attributed to its pathophysiological status and chronicity of the wound and reduced proliferation rate of CWFs is due to lesser expression of vimentin, which is a key protein for in vitro cell proliferation.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Outcome of the study serve as an immunological tool to guide the chronicity of the wound, which helps to understand the wound towards design of personalized care. The findings also represent a promising opportunity to gain insight into how cell cycle arrest can impact on wound healing and clinical outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12176,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and molecular pathology","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104803"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human primary chronic wound derived fibroblasts demonstrate differential pattern in expression of fibroblast specific markers, cell cycle arrest and reduced proliferation\",\"authors\":\"P. Monika ,&nbsp;M.N. Chandraprabha ,&nbsp;K.N. Chidambara Murthy ,&nbsp;Annapoorni Rangarajan ,&nbsp;P. Veena Waiker ,&nbsp;M. Sathish\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yexmp.2022.104803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Although wound refers to simple cut in the skin, most wounds don't heal because of the various local and systemic factors that lead to its complexity and chronicity. Thus, prior understanding of the status of the wound is necessary and methods that can differentiate between the healing and non-healing wounds at a much earlier stage is crucial for a successful </span>treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The current study aims at differentiating Acute Wound Fibroblasts (AWFs) and Chronic Wound Fibroblasts (CWFs) based on differential expression of fibroblast specific markers such as Vimentin<span> and Alpha Smooth Muscle Actin (α-SMA) and compare its cell cycle and proliferation.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Immunostaining<span><span> and western blotting<span> analysis showed that, AWFs and CWFs differentially expressed vimentin and α-SMA, with AWFs and CWFs showing higher expression of vimentin and α-SMA respectively. AWFs showed higher distributions in G0/G1 (67.43% vs. 62.16%), S phase (22.61% vs. 8.51%) compared to CWFs. However, AWFs showed decreased distributions compared to CWFs in G2 + M phase (8.14% vs. 10.6%). Thus, it was observed that CWFs showed </span></span>cell cycle arrest<span> in the G1/G0 phase and inhibited DNA synthesis<span>, which was further confirmed by reduced proliferation of CWFs. We suggest that, differential expression of the cell specific markers can be attributed to its pathophysiological status and chronicity of the wound and reduced proliferation rate of CWFs is due to lesser expression of vimentin, which is a key protein for in vitro cell proliferation.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Outcome of the study serve as an immunological tool to guide the chronicity of the wound, which helps to understand the wound towards design of personalized care. The findings also represent a promising opportunity to gain insight into how cell cycle arrest can impact on wound healing and clinical outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental and molecular pathology\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104803\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental and molecular pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014480022000661\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and molecular pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014480022000661","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

引言虽然伤口是指皮肤上的简单伤口,但由于各种局部和系统因素导致其复杂性和慢性性,大多数伤口无法愈合。因此,事先了解伤口的状况是必要的,在早期阶段区分愈合和未愈合伤口的方法对于成功治疗至关重要。方法本研究旨在通过Vimentin和α-平滑肌肌动蛋白(α-SMA)等成纤维细胞特异性标记物的差异表达,区分急性创伤成纤维细胞(AWFs)和慢性创伤成纤维纤维细胞(CWFs),并比较其细胞周期和增殖。结果免疫组织化学染色和蛋白质印迹分析显示,AWFs和CWFs表达不同的波形蛋白和α-SMA,其中AWFs、CWFs分别表达较高的波形素和α-SSMA。AWF在G0/G1期(67.43%对62.16%)和S期(22.61%对8.51%)的分布高于CWF。然而,与CWFs相比,AWFs在G2+M期的分布减少(8.14%对10.6%)。因此,观察到CWFs在G1/G0期表现出细胞周期停滞并抑制DNA合成,这通过CWFs的增殖减少得到了进一步证实。我们认为,细胞特异性标记物的差异表达可归因于其病理生理状态和伤口的慢性性,CWFs增殖率的降低是由于波形蛋白的表达减少,波形蛋白是体外细胞增殖的关键蛋白。结论研究结果可作为指导伤口慢性性的免疫学工具,有助于了解伤口的个性化护理设计。这些发现也为深入了解细胞周期停滞如何影响伤口愈合和临床结果提供了一个很有希望的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Human primary chronic wound derived fibroblasts demonstrate differential pattern in expression of fibroblast specific markers, cell cycle arrest and reduced proliferation

Human primary chronic wound derived fibroblasts demonstrate differential pattern in expression of fibroblast specific markers, cell cycle arrest and reduced proliferation

Introduction

Although wound refers to simple cut in the skin, most wounds don't heal because of the various local and systemic factors that lead to its complexity and chronicity. Thus, prior understanding of the status of the wound is necessary and methods that can differentiate between the healing and non-healing wounds at a much earlier stage is crucial for a successful treatment.

Methods

The current study aims at differentiating Acute Wound Fibroblasts (AWFs) and Chronic Wound Fibroblasts (CWFs) based on differential expression of fibroblast specific markers such as Vimentin and Alpha Smooth Muscle Actin (α-SMA) and compare its cell cycle and proliferation.

Results

Immunostaining and western blotting analysis showed that, AWFs and CWFs differentially expressed vimentin and α-SMA, with AWFs and CWFs showing higher expression of vimentin and α-SMA respectively. AWFs showed higher distributions in G0/G1 (67.43% vs. 62.16%), S phase (22.61% vs. 8.51%) compared to CWFs. However, AWFs showed decreased distributions compared to CWFs in G2 + M phase (8.14% vs. 10.6%). Thus, it was observed that CWFs showed cell cycle arrest in the G1/G0 phase and inhibited DNA synthesis, which was further confirmed by reduced proliferation of CWFs. We suggest that, differential expression of the cell specific markers can be attributed to its pathophysiological status and chronicity of the wound and reduced proliferation rate of CWFs is due to lesser expression of vimentin, which is a key protein for in vitro cell proliferation.

Conclusions

Outcome of the study serve as an immunological tool to guide the chronicity of the wound, which helps to understand the wound towards design of personalized care. The findings also represent a promising opportunity to gain insight into how cell cycle arrest can impact on wound healing and clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
11.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Under new editorial leadership, Experimental and Molecular Pathology presents original articles on disease processes in relation to structural and biochemical alterations in mammalian tissues and fluids and on the application of newer techniques of molecular biology to problems of pathology in humans and other animals. The journal also publishes selected interpretive synthesis reviews by bench level investigators working at the "cutting edge" of contemporary research in pathology. In addition, special thematic issues present original research reports that unravel some of Nature''s most jealously guarded secrets on the pathologic basis of disease. Research Areas include: Stem cells; Neoangiogenesis; Molecular diagnostics; Polymerase chain reaction; In situ hybridization; DNA sequencing; Cell receptors; Carcinogenesis; Pathobiology of neoplasia; Complex infectious diseases; Transplantation; Cytokines; Flow cytomeric analysis; Inflammation; Cellular injury; Immunology and hypersensitivity; Athersclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信