一个比形成性和总结性更大的世界

Michael Quinn Patton
{"title":"一个比形成性和总结性更大的世界","authors":"Michael Quinn Patton","doi":"10.1016/S0886-1633(96)90018-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Patton continues the debate by identifying three arenas of evaluation practice in which the formative/summative dichotomy appears limited: knowledge-generating evaluations aimed at conceptual rather than instrumental use; developmental evaluation; and use of evaluation processes to support interventions or empower participants. In so doing, the essence of “evaluation” is more broadly defined, and the impact of harsh criticism on the listener is demonstrated through personal example.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":84713,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation practice","volume":"17 2","pages":"Pages 131-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0886-1633(96)90018-5","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A world larger than formative and summative\",\"authors\":\"Michael Quinn Patton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0886-1633(96)90018-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Patton continues the debate by identifying three arenas of evaluation practice in which the formative/summative dichotomy appears limited: knowledge-generating evaluations aimed at conceptual rather than instrumental use; developmental evaluation; and use of evaluation processes to support interventions or empower participants. In so doing, the essence of “evaluation” is more broadly defined, and the impact of harsh criticism on the listener is demonstrated through personal example.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":84713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation practice\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 131-144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0886-1633(96)90018-5\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886163396900185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886163396900185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

巴顿继续辩论,确定了形成性/总结性二分法似乎有限的评价实践的三个领域:旨在概念而非工具性使用的知识生成评价;发展评价;以及利用评价程序支持干预措施或赋予参与者权力。在这样做的过程中,“评价”的本质得到了更广泛的定义,严厉批评对听众的影响通过个人例子得到了证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A world larger than formative and summative

Patton continues the debate by identifying three arenas of evaluation practice in which the formative/summative dichotomy appears limited: knowledge-generating evaluations aimed at conceptual rather than instrumental use; developmental evaluation; and use of evaluation processes to support interventions or empower participants. In so doing, the essence of “evaluation” is more broadly defined, and the impact of harsh criticism on the listener is demonstrated through personal example.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信