致密砂岩气藏多尺度地质工程甜点评价方法

IF 4.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Haiyan Zhu , Ding Gong , Bing Zhang
{"title":"致密砂岩气藏多尺度地质工程甜点评价方法","authors":"Haiyan Zhu ,&nbsp;Ding Gong ,&nbsp;Bing Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ngib.2023.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Exploration and development practices have proved that staged volumetric fracturing stimulation in horizontal wells is a key technology for tight sandstone gas development, and reservoir sweet spot is an important basis for the perforation position selection and staged fracturing in the process of well location deployment and reservoir stimulation. Tight sandstone reservoirs are usually characterized by sandstone and mudstone interlayers with different thicknesses, and complex natural fracture distribution and geostress state. It is hard to predict “geological-engineering” dual sweet spots, and these two kinds of sweet spots are usually in different zones. As a result, there lacks a basis for the optimization of fracturing parameters to stimulate tight sandstone reservoirs. This paper establishes a geological sweet spot prediction model which takes into account total hydrocarbon content, reservoir porosity and other factors, then puts forward a 3D multi-scale engineering sweet spot evaluation method which takes into account lithology, fracture morphology, fracture mechanical behavior, and dilatation and shear dilation effect, and finally a “geological-engineering” dual sweet spot evaluation model for tight sandstone reservoirs. Two wells in the tight sandstone gas field in the Linxing Block of the Ordos Basin were selected as a case, and the dual sweet spot profiles, fracturing pressure and SRV were compared and analyzed. The results show that: 1) shear dilation angle influences the distribution of engineering sweet spots at the most in the study area, followed by dissipated energy, elastic modulus and fracture energy; 2) the geological sweet spot zone with a high coefficient is not necessarily the pay zone with high shale gas production; 3) the engineering sweet spot zone with a high coefficient needs lower fracture pressure and can be stimulated relatively sufficiently; 4) high-quality geological sweet spots and high-quality engineering sweet spots are poorly consistent in spatial location. In conclusion, the stimulation of tight sandstone gas reservoirs shall take geological sweet spot as the basis and engineering sweet spot as the guarantee, and the distribution of dual sweep spots should be considered comprehensively. The multi-scale “geological-engineering” dual sweet spot evaluation method proposed in this paper provides important technical support for the prediction of sweet spots of the tight sandstone gas and the optimization of development schemes in the study area.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37116,"journal":{"name":"Natural Gas Industry B","volume":"10 5","pages":"Pages 522-532"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multi-scale geological–engineering sweet spot evaluation method for tight sandstone gas reservoirs\",\"authors\":\"Haiyan Zhu ,&nbsp;Ding Gong ,&nbsp;Bing Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ngib.2023.09.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Exploration and development practices have proved that staged volumetric fracturing stimulation in horizontal wells is a key technology for tight sandstone gas development, and reservoir sweet spot is an important basis for the perforation position selection and staged fracturing in the process of well location deployment and reservoir stimulation. Tight sandstone reservoirs are usually characterized by sandstone and mudstone interlayers with different thicknesses, and complex natural fracture distribution and geostress state. It is hard to predict “geological-engineering” dual sweet spots, and these two kinds of sweet spots are usually in different zones. As a result, there lacks a basis for the optimization of fracturing parameters to stimulate tight sandstone reservoirs. This paper establishes a geological sweet spot prediction model which takes into account total hydrocarbon content, reservoir porosity and other factors, then puts forward a 3D multi-scale engineering sweet spot evaluation method which takes into account lithology, fracture morphology, fracture mechanical behavior, and dilatation and shear dilation effect, and finally a “geological-engineering” dual sweet spot evaluation model for tight sandstone reservoirs. Two wells in the tight sandstone gas field in the Linxing Block of the Ordos Basin were selected as a case, and the dual sweet spot profiles, fracturing pressure and SRV were compared and analyzed. The results show that: 1) shear dilation angle influences the distribution of engineering sweet spots at the most in the study area, followed by dissipated energy, elastic modulus and fracture energy; 2) the geological sweet spot zone with a high coefficient is not necessarily the pay zone with high shale gas production; 3) the engineering sweet spot zone with a high coefficient needs lower fracture pressure and can be stimulated relatively sufficiently; 4) high-quality geological sweet spots and high-quality engineering sweet spots are poorly consistent in spatial location. In conclusion, the stimulation of tight sandstone gas reservoirs shall take geological sweet spot as the basis and engineering sweet spot as the guarantee, and the distribution of dual sweep spots should be considered comprehensively. The multi-scale “geological-engineering” dual sweet spot evaluation method proposed in this paper provides important technical support for the prediction of sweet spots of the tight sandstone gas and the optimization of development schemes in the study area.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Gas Industry B\",\"volume\":\"10 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 522-532\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Gas Industry B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352854023000657\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Gas Industry B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352854023000657","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

勘探开发实践证明,水平井分段体积压裂增产是致密砂岩气开发的关键技术,储层最佳点是井位部署和储层增产过程中射孔位置选择和分段压裂的重要依据。致密砂岩储层通常以厚度不同的砂岩和泥岩夹层为特征,天然裂缝分布和地应力状态复杂。很难预测“地质工程”的双甜点,而且这两种甜点通常位于不同的区域。因此,优化压裂参数以刺激致密砂岩储层缺乏依据。本文建立了一个考虑总烃含量、储层孔隙度等因素的地质甜点预测模型,提出了一种考虑岩性、裂缝形态、裂缝力学行为以及膨胀和剪切膨胀效应的三维多尺度工程甜点评价方法,最后建立了致密砂岩油藏的地质工程双甜点评价模型。以鄂尔多斯盆地林兴区块致密砂岩气田的两口井为例,对其双甜点剖面、压裂压力和SRV进行了对比分析。研究结果表明:1)剪切膨胀角对研究区工程甜蜜点分布的影响最大,其次是耗散能、弹性模量和断裂能;2) 高系数的地质甜点带不一定是页岩气产量高的产气带;3) 高系数的工程甜点带需要较低的破裂压力,并且可以相对充分地刺激;4) 优质地质甜点和优质工程甜点在空间位置上的一致性较差。综上所述,致密砂岩气藏的增产应以地质有利点为基础,以工程有利点为保证,并应综合考虑双波及点的分布。本文提出的多尺度“地质工程”双甜点评价方法,为研究区致密砂岩气甜点预测和开发方案优化提供了重要的技术支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A multi-scale geological–engineering sweet spot evaluation method for tight sandstone gas reservoirs

Exploration and development practices have proved that staged volumetric fracturing stimulation in horizontal wells is a key technology for tight sandstone gas development, and reservoir sweet spot is an important basis for the perforation position selection and staged fracturing in the process of well location deployment and reservoir stimulation. Tight sandstone reservoirs are usually characterized by sandstone and mudstone interlayers with different thicknesses, and complex natural fracture distribution and geostress state. It is hard to predict “geological-engineering” dual sweet spots, and these two kinds of sweet spots are usually in different zones. As a result, there lacks a basis for the optimization of fracturing parameters to stimulate tight sandstone reservoirs. This paper establishes a geological sweet spot prediction model which takes into account total hydrocarbon content, reservoir porosity and other factors, then puts forward a 3D multi-scale engineering sweet spot evaluation method which takes into account lithology, fracture morphology, fracture mechanical behavior, and dilatation and shear dilation effect, and finally a “geological-engineering” dual sweet spot evaluation model for tight sandstone reservoirs. Two wells in the tight sandstone gas field in the Linxing Block of the Ordos Basin were selected as a case, and the dual sweet spot profiles, fracturing pressure and SRV were compared and analyzed. The results show that: 1) shear dilation angle influences the distribution of engineering sweet spots at the most in the study area, followed by dissipated energy, elastic modulus and fracture energy; 2) the geological sweet spot zone with a high coefficient is not necessarily the pay zone with high shale gas production; 3) the engineering sweet spot zone with a high coefficient needs lower fracture pressure and can be stimulated relatively sufficiently; 4) high-quality geological sweet spots and high-quality engineering sweet spots are poorly consistent in spatial location. In conclusion, the stimulation of tight sandstone gas reservoirs shall take geological sweet spot as the basis and engineering sweet spot as the guarantee, and the distribution of dual sweep spots should be considered comprehensively. The multi-scale “geological-engineering” dual sweet spot evaluation method proposed in this paper provides important technical support for the prediction of sweet spots of the tight sandstone gas and the optimization of development schemes in the study area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Natural Gas Industry B
Natural Gas Industry B Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geology
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
79 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信