{"title":"评价提案在预先研究和紧急研究中的作用","authors":"Nick L. Smith","doi":"10.1016/S0886-1633(97)90004-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Proposals satisfy a number of functions in evaluation work. They may serve as a work plan, a basis for a contract, a request for commitment, evidence of ability, an evaluative criterion, and, most importantly, to justify the conduct of the study. This article examines how these functions differ depending on whether the proposal concerns a preordinate study in which methods are pre-specified, or an emergent study in which decisions about methods are made as the study proceeds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":84713,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation practice","volume":"18 1","pages":"Pages 17-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0886-1633(97)90004-0","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functions of the evaluation proposal in preordinate and emergent studies\",\"authors\":\"Nick L. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0886-1633(97)90004-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Proposals satisfy a number of functions in evaluation work. They may serve as a work plan, a basis for a contract, a request for commitment, evidence of ability, an evaluative criterion, and, most importantly, to justify the conduct of the study. This article examines how these functions differ depending on whether the proposal concerns a preordinate study in which methods are pre-specified, or an emergent study in which decisions about methods are made as the study proceeds.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":84713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation practice\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 17-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0886-1633(97)90004-0\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886163397900040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886163397900040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Functions of the evaluation proposal in preordinate and emergent studies
Proposals satisfy a number of functions in evaluation work. They may serve as a work plan, a basis for a contract, a request for commitment, evidence of ability, an evaluative criterion, and, most importantly, to justify the conduct of the study. This article examines how these functions differ depending on whether the proposal concerns a preordinate study in which methods are pre-specified, or an emergent study in which decisions about methods are made as the study proceeds.