基础高度测量

Janet L. Engstrom CNM, PhD , Barbara L. McFarlin CNM, RDMS, MS , Milo B. Sampson MD, MS
{"title":"基础高度测量","authors":"Janet L. Engstrom CNM, PhD ,&nbsp;Barbara L. McFarlin CNM, RDMS, MS ,&nbsp;Milo B. Sampson MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/0091-2182(93)90012-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this study was to determine how accurately clinicians can identify the uppermost border of the uterine fundus when they obtain fundal height measurements. Clinicians were instructed to identify the uppermost border of the uterine fundus in their usual manner and make a small pen mark on the maternal abdomen at that point Real-time ultrasonography was then used to locate the actual level of the fundus and measure the distance between the clinician's assessment and the actual level of the fundus. Measurements were obtained from 126 women. Six clinicians participated in the study, and the differences between the clinicians' errors were not statistically significant (F = 1.26; d.f. = 5,120; <em>P</em> = .2873). For the entire series, the mean error was −.45 cm (SD = 1.99 cm), the mean absolute error was 1.25 cm, the maximal error was 8.6 cm, the percentage of errors that exceeded 1 cm was 42.1%, and the percentage of errors that exceeded 2 cm was 20.6%. Examiner error was not associated with factors such as maternal height, prepregnancy weight, present weight, prepregnancy body mass index, parity, gestational weeks, the amount of fat on the anterior abdominal wall, or the presence of the placenta or fetal parts in the fundus. Examiner error was influenced by thickness of the uterine wall and fetal presentation. These findings indicate that clinicians make errors in identifying the uterine fundus in a significant number of cases and that the methods used by clinicians to identify the uterine fundus need to be evaluated and improved.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nurse-midwifery","volume":"38 6","pages":"Pages 318-323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0091-2182(93)90012-6","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fundal height measurement\",\"authors\":\"Janet L. Engstrom CNM, PhD ,&nbsp;Barbara L. McFarlin CNM, RDMS, MS ,&nbsp;Milo B. Sampson MD, MS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0091-2182(93)90012-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The purpose of this study was to determine how accurately clinicians can identify the uppermost border of the uterine fundus when they obtain fundal height measurements. Clinicians were instructed to identify the uppermost border of the uterine fundus in their usual manner and make a small pen mark on the maternal abdomen at that point Real-time ultrasonography was then used to locate the actual level of the fundus and measure the distance between the clinician's assessment and the actual level of the fundus. Measurements were obtained from 126 women. Six clinicians participated in the study, and the differences between the clinicians' errors were not statistically significant (F = 1.26; d.f. = 5,120; <em>P</em> = .2873). For the entire series, the mean error was −.45 cm (SD = 1.99 cm), the mean absolute error was 1.25 cm, the maximal error was 8.6 cm, the percentage of errors that exceeded 1 cm was 42.1%, and the percentage of errors that exceeded 2 cm was 20.6%. Examiner error was not associated with factors such as maternal height, prepregnancy weight, present weight, prepregnancy body mass index, parity, gestational weeks, the amount of fat on the anterior abdominal wall, or the presence of the placenta or fetal parts in the fundus. Examiner error was influenced by thickness of the uterine wall and fetal presentation. These findings indicate that clinicians make errors in identifying the uterine fundus in a significant number of cases and that the methods used by clinicians to identify the uterine fundus need to be evaluated and improved.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nurse-midwifery\",\"volume\":\"38 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 318-323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0091-2182(93)90012-6\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nurse-midwifery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0091218293900126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nurse-midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0091218293900126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

这项研究的目的是确定临床医生在测量子宫底高度时能够准确识别子宫底最上边界的程度。临床医生被指示以他们通常的方式识别子宫底部的最上边界,并在产妇腹部做一个小的笔标记。然后使用实时超声定位子宫底部的实际水平,并测量临床医生的评估与子宫底部的实际水平之间的距离。对126名妇女进行了测量。6名临床医生参与了这项研究,临床医生的误差之间的差异没有统计学意义(F=1.26;d.F.=5120;P=.2873)。在整个系列中,平均误差为−.45厘米(SD=1.99厘米),平均绝对误差为1.25厘米,最大误差为8.6厘米,超过1厘米的误差百分比为42.1%,超过2cm的错误率为20.6%。检查者的错误与母亲身高、孕前体重、当前体重、孕前身体质量指数、产次、孕周、前腹壁脂肪量或胎盘或胎儿部位在眼底的存在等因素无关。检查者的失误受到子宫壁厚度和胎儿表现的影响。这些发现表明,在相当多的病例中,临床医生在识别子宫底时会出错,临床医生用于识别子宫底的方法需要评估和改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fundal height measurement

The purpose of this study was to determine how accurately clinicians can identify the uppermost border of the uterine fundus when they obtain fundal height measurements. Clinicians were instructed to identify the uppermost border of the uterine fundus in their usual manner and make a small pen mark on the maternal abdomen at that point Real-time ultrasonography was then used to locate the actual level of the fundus and measure the distance between the clinician's assessment and the actual level of the fundus. Measurements were obtained from 126 women. Six clinicians participated in the study, and the differences between the clinicians' errors were not statistically significant (F = 1.26; d.f. = 5,120; P = .2873). For the entire series, the mean error was −.45 cm (SD = 1.99 cm), the mean absolute error was 1.25 cm, the maximal error was 8.6 cm, the percentage of errors that exceeded 1 cm was 42.1%, and the percentage of errors that exceeded 2 cm was 20.6%. Examiner error was not associated with factors such as maternal height, prepregnancy weight, present weight, prepregnancy body mass index, parity, gestational weeks, the amount of fat on the anterior abdominal wall, or the presence of the placenta or fetal parts in the fundus. Examiner error was influenced by thickness of the uterine wall and fetal presentation. These findings indicate that clinicians make errors in identifying the uterine fundus in a significant number of cases and that the methods used by clinicians to identify the uterine fundus need to be evaluated and improved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信