{"title":"评估类型和评估人员类型","authors":"Michael Scriven","doi":"10.1016/S0886-1633(96)90020-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In response to the previous papers, Scriven defends the formative/ summative dichotomy as one reasonable way (of several possible ways) to classify evaluation activities. He argues that context ultimately ascribes to evaluation activities their formative or summative function, and clarifies areas of agreement and disagreement with authors Chen, Patton, and Wholey. The paper concludes with a definition of “evaluator” and a listing of competencies required for “entry into the club.”</p></div>","PeriodicalId":84713,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation practice","volume":"17 2","pages":"Pages 151-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0886-1633(96)90020-3","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Types of evaluation and types of evaluator\",\"authors\":\"Michael Scriven\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0886-1633(96)90020-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In response to the previous papers, Scriven defends the formative/ summative dichotomy as one reasonable way (of several possible ways) to classify evaluation activities. He argues that context ultimately ascribes to evaluation activities their formative or summative function, and clarifies areas of agreement and disagreement with authors Chen, Patton, and Wholey. The paper concludes with a definition of “evaluator” and a listing of competencies required for “entry into the club.”</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":84713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation practice\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 151-161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0886-1633(96)90020-3\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886163396900203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886163396900203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In response to the previous papers, Scriven defends the formative/ summative dichotomy as one reasonable way (of several possible ways) to classify evaluation activities. He argues that context ultimately ascribes to evaluation activities their formative or summative function, and clarifies areas of agreement and disagreement with authors Chen, Patton, and Wholey. The paper concludes with a definition of “evaluator” and a listing of competencies required for “entry into the club.”