“自我意识、赋权意识和目标感”:澳大利亚全科医生的职业多元化和幸福感。

Jill Benson, Shaun Prentice, Penny Need, Michelle Pitot, Taryn Elliott
{"title":"“自我意识、赋权意识和目标感”:澳大利亚全科医生的职业多元化和幸福感。","authors":"Jill Benson, Shaun Prentice, Penny Need, Michelle Pitot, Taryn Elliott","doi":"10.1071/PY23090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Burnout and workforce shortages comprise a vicious cycle in medicine, particularly for Australian general practitioners (GPs). Professional diversification, whereby individuals work multiple roles across their week, may help address this problem, but this strategy is under-studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed 1157 Australian GPs using qualitative and quantitative questions examining professional diversification, values, autonomy, and wellbeing. Quantitative data were analysed using inferential statistics, whilst qualitative data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. We triangulated the data by using the qualitative findings to inform further quantitative testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 40% of the sample had diversified. Although diversifying was not significantly associated with wellbeing, the qualitative data indicated that diversification supported GPs' wellbeing by enhancing career sustainability, accomplished through various pathways (e.g. value fulfilment, autonomy, variety). Subsequent quantitative analyses provided evidence that these pathways mediated the relationship between diversification and wellbeing. To diversify, GPs needed particular personal qualities, external supports, flexibility, and serendipity. Barriers to diversifying mirrored these factors, spanning individual (e.g. skillset) and situational levels (e.g. autonomy, location).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diversification can support GPs' wellbeing if it meets their needs. Organisations should focus on publicising opportunities and accommodating requests to diversify.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":" ","pages":"NULL"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'A sense of self, empowerment and purposefulness': professional diversification and wellbeing in Australian general practitioners.\",\"authors\":\"Jill Benson, Shaun Prentice, Penny Need, Michelle Pitot, Taryn Elliott\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/PY23090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Burnout and workforce shortages comprise a vicious cycle in medicine, particularly for Australian general practitioners (GPs). Professional diversification, whereby individuals work multiple roles across their week, may help address this problem, but this strategy is under-studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed 1157 Australian GPs using qualitative and quantitative questions examining professional diversification, values, autonomy, and wellbeing. Quantitative data were analysed using inferential statistics, whilst qualitative data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. We triangulated the data by using the qualitative findings to inform further quantitative testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 40% of the sample had diversified. Although diversifying was not significantly associated with wellbeing, the qualitative data indicated that diversification supported GPs' wellbeing by enhancing career sustainability, accomplished through various pathways (e.g. value fulfilment, autonomy, variety). Subsequent quantitative analyses provided evidence that these pathways mediated the relationship between diversification and wellbeing. To diversify, GPs needed particular personal qualities, external supports, flexibility, and serendipity. Barriers to diversifying mirrored these factors, spanning individual (e.g. skillset) and situational levels (e.g. autonomy, location).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diversification can support GPs' wellbeing if it meets their needs. Organisations should focus on publicising opportunities and accommodating requests to diversify.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian journal of primary health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"NULL\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian journal of primary health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY23090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY23090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:倦怠和劳动力短缺构成了医学的恶性循环,尤其是对澳大利亚全科医生来说。职业多元化,即个人在一周内扮演多个角色,可能有助于解决这个问题,但这一策略研究不足。方法:我们使用定性和定量问题调查了1157名澳大利亚全科医生,考察了职业多元化、价值观、自主权和幸福感。定量数据使用推理统计学进行分析,而定性数据使用归纳专题分析进行分析。我们使用定性结果对数据进行三角测量,为进一步的定量测试提供信息。结果:约40%的样本具有多样性。尽管多样化与幸福感没有显著关联,但定性数据表明,多样化通过各种途径(如价值实现、自主性、多样性)提高职业可持续性,从而支持全科医生的幸福感。随后的定量分析提供了证据,证明这些途径介导了多样化和幸福感之间的关系。为了多样化,全科医生需要特殊的个人素质、外部支持、灵活性和偶然发现。多样化的障碍反映了这些因素,包括个人(如技能集)和情境水平(如自主性、位置)。结论:如果多样化能满足全科医生的需求,它可以支持他们的健康。组织应专注于宣传机会和满足多样化的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'A sense of self, empowerment and purposefulness': professional diversification and wellbeing in Australian general practitioners.

Background: Burnout and workforce shortages comprise a vicious cycle in medicine, particularly for Australian general practitioners (GPs). Professional diversification, whereby individuals work multiple roles across their week, may help address this problem, but this strategy is under-studied.

Methods: We surveyed 1157 Australian GPs using qualitative and quantitative questions examining professional diversification, values, autonomy, and wellbeing. Quantitative data were analysed using inferential statistics, whilst qualitative data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. We triangulated the data by using the qualitative findings to inform further quantitative testing.

Results: Approximately 40% of the sample had diversified. Although diversifying was not significantly associated with wellbeing, the qualitative data indicated that diversification supported GPs' wellbeing by enhancing career sustainability, accomplished through various pathways (e.g. value fulfilment, autonomy, variety). Subsequent quantitative analyses provided evidence that these pathways mediated the relationship between diversification and wellbeing. To diversify, GPs needed particular personal qualities, external supports, flexibility, and serendipity. Barriers to diversifying mirrored these factors, spanning individual (e.g. skillset) and situational levels (e.g. autonomy, location).

Conclusions: Diversification can support GPs' wellbeing if it meets their needs. Organisations should focus on publicising opportunities and accommodating requests to diversify.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信