在老年髋部骨折中实施髂筋膜隔室阻滞计划:一级学术创伤中心的经验。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Gary Ulrich, Kameron Kraus, Seth Polk, David Zuelzer, Paul E Matuszewski
{"title":"在老年髋部骨折中实施髂筋膜隔室阻滞计划:一级学术创伤中心的经验。","authors":"Gary Ulrich, Kameron Kraus, Seth Polk, David Zuelzer, Paul E Matuszewski","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Determine adherence to a newly implemented protocol of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) in geriatric hip fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Level I trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Patients with a hip fracture treated with cephalomedullary nailing or hemiarthroplasty (CPT codes 27245 or 27236).</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Adherence to a protocol for FICB, time intervals between emergency department arrival, FICB, and surgery stratified by time of admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred eighty patients were studied (average age 78 years, 70% female). Approximately 53.2% of patients received an FICB, which was less than a predefined acceptable adherence rate of 75% ( P < 0.001). Approximately 5.0% received an FICB within 4 hours and 17.3% within 6 hours from admission. Admission during daylight hours (7 am -7p m ) when compared with evening hours (7 pm -7 am ) was associated with improved timeliness ([8.3% vs. 0% within 4 hours, P < 0.001] [27.5% vs. 2.4% within 6 hours, P < 0.001]). Improved adherence to the protocol was observed over time (odds ratio: 1.0013, 95% confidence interval, 1.0001-1.0025, P = 0.0388).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FICB implementation was poor but gradually improved over time. Few patients received an FICB promptly, especially during night hours. Overall, this study demonstrates that implementation of an FICB program at a Level I academic trauma center can be difficult; however, many hurdles can be overcome with institutional support and dedication of resources such as staff, space, and additional training.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":"96-101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of a Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block Program in Geriatric Hip Fractures: The Experience at a Level I Academic Trauma Center.\",\"authors\":\"Gary Ulrich, Kameron Kraus, Seth Polk, David Zuelzer, Paul E Matuszewski\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Determine adherence to a newly implemented protocol of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) in geriatric hip fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Level I trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Patients with a hip fracture treated with cephalomedullary nailing or hemiarthroplasty (CPT codes 27245 or 27236).</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Adherence to a protocol for FICB, time intervals between emergency department arrival, FICB, and surgery stratified by time of admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred eighty patients were studied (average age 78 years, 70% female). Approximately 53.2% of patients received an FICB, which was less than a predefined acceptable adherence rate of 75% ( P < 0.001). Approximately 5.0% received an FICB within 4 hours and 17.3% within 6 hours from admission. Admission during daylight hours (7 am -7p m ) when compared with evening hours (7 pm -7 am ) was associated with improved timeliness ([8.3% vs. 0% within 4 hours, P < 0.001] [27.5% vs. 2.4% within 6 hours, P < 0.001]). Improved adherence to the protocol was observed over time (odds ratio: 1.0013, 95% confidence interval, 1.0001-1.0025, P = 0.0388).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FICB implementation was poor but gradually improved over time. Few patients received an FICB promptly, especially during night hours. Overall, this study demonstrates that implementation of an FICB program at a Level I academic trauma center can be difficult; however, many hurdles can be overcome with institutional support and dedication of resources such as staff, space, and additional training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"96-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002722\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002722","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定老年髋部骨折患者是否遵守最新实施的髂筋膜间隔阻滞(FICB)方案。方法:设计:回顾性分析。设置:一级创伤中心。患者选择标准:髋关节骨折患者接受头髓内钉或半关节成形术治疗(CPT代码27245或27236)。结果测量和比较:遵守FICB协议,急诊室到达、FICB和手术之间的时间间隔按入院时间分层。结果:380名患者接受了研究(平均年龄78岁,70%为女性)。53.2%的患者接受了FICB,这低于预定义的75%的可接受依从率(结论:FICB的实施很差,但随着时间的推移逐渐改善。很少有患者能及时接受FICB治疗,尤其是在夜间。总的来说,这项研究表明,在一级学术创伤中心实施FICB计划可能很困难。然而,通过机构支持和资源投入,如人员、空间和额外资源,可以克服许多障碍。)l训练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of a Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block Program in Geriatric Hip Fractures: The Experience at a Level I Academic Trauma Center.

Objectives: Determine adherence to a newly implemented protocol of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) in geriatric hip fractures.

Methods:

Design: Retrospective review.

Setting: Level I trauma center.

Patient selection criteria: Patients with a hip fracture treated with cephalomedullary nailing or hemiarthroplasty (CPT codes 27245 or 27236).

Outcome measures and comparisons: Adherence to a protocol for FICB, time intervals between emergency department arrival, FICB, and surgery stratified by time of admission.

Results: Three hundred eighty patients were studied (average age 78 years, 70% female). Approximately 53.2% of patients received an FICB, which was less than a predefined acceptable adherence rate of 75% ( P < 0.001). Approximately 5.0% received an FICB within 4 hours and 17.3% within 6 hours from admission. Admission during daylight hours (7 am -7p m ) when compared with evening hours (7 pm -7 am ) was associated with improved timeliness ([8.3% vs. 0% within 4 hours, P < 0.001] [27.5% vs. 2.4% within 6 hours, P < 0.001]). Improved adherence to the protocol was observed over time (odds ratio: 1.0013, 95% confidence interval, 1.0001-1.0025, P = 0.0388).

Conclusions: FICB implementation was poor but gradually improved over time. Few patients received an FICB promptly, especially during night hours. Overall, this study demonstrates that implementation of an FICB program at a Level I academic trauma center can be difficult; however, many hurdles can be overcome with institutional support and dedication of resources such as staff, space, and additional training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信