{"title":"癌症肝外胆管斑点扫描质子治疗与容量调制放射治疗的剂量学比较研究。","authors":"Toshiyuki Ogata PhD, Norihiro Aibe MD, PhD, Takuya Kimoto MD, PhD, Tadashi Takenaka RTT, Gen Suzuki MD, PhD, Kei Yamada MD, PhD, Hideya Yamazaki MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.meddos.2023.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>This study aimed to compare the dose distributions and clarify the dosimetric characteristics of spot-scanning </span>proton therapy<span><span> (SSPT) and photon volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for extrahepatic </span>bile duct cancer<span> (EBDC). This retrospective study included 10 patients with EBDC treated with real-time image-gated SSPT. Using the simultaneous integrated boost technique, the 2 prescription dose levels for planning target volumes were 72.6 and 44 Gy, delivered in 22 fractions. Plan quality comparisons were conducted by analyzing various parameters, including homogeneity, conformity, dose to organs at risk, and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for radiation-induced liver damage (RILD). The target dose distributions using SSPT were almost equivalent to those achieved using photon VMAT. There was a significant reduction in all liver dose parameters, the NTCP value for RILD, and kidney dose (mean, V</span></span></span><sub>12 Gy</sub>, and V<sub>18 Gy</sub>) in SSPT than in photon VMAT. No significant differences were observed in the intestinal doses in the high-dose area. Thus, compared with photon VMAT, SSPT for EBDC significantly reduced radiation doses to the liver and kidneys and has shown potential clinical benefits of reduced radiation-induced toxicity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49837,"journal":{"name":"Medical Dosimetry","volume":"49 1","pages":"Pages 46-49"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative dosimetric study of spot-scanning proton therapy versus volumetric-modulated radiation therapy for extrahepatic bile duct cancer\",\"authors\":\"Toshiyuki Ogata PhD, Norihiro Aibe MD, PhD, Takuya Kimoto MD, PhD, Tadashi Takenaka RTT, Gen Suzuki MD, PhD, Kei Yamada MD, PhD, Hideya Yamazaki MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.meddos.2023.10.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>This study aimed to compare the dose distributions and clarify the dosimetric characteristics of spot-scanning </span>proton therapy<span><span> (SSPT) and photon volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for extrahepatic </span>bile duct cancer<span> (EBDC). This retrospective study included 10 patients with EBDC treated with real-time image-gated SSPT. Using the simultaneous integrated boost technique, the 2 prescription dose levels for planning target volumes were 72.6 and 44 Gy, delivered in 22 fractions. Plan quality comparisons were conducted by analyzing various parameters, including homogeneity, conformity, dose to organs at risk, and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for radiation-induced liver damage (RILD). The target dose distributions using SSPT were almost equivalent to those achieved using photon VMAT. There was a significant reduction in all liver dose parameters, the NTCP value for RILD, and kidney dose (mean, V</span></span></span><sub>12 Gy</sub>, and V<sub>18 Gy</sub>) in SSPT than in photon VMAT. No significant differences were observed in the intestinal doses in the high-dose area. Thus, compared with photon VMAT, SSPT for EBDC significantly reduced radiation doses to the liver and kidneys and has shown potential clinical benefits of reduced radiation-induced toxicity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Dosimetry\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 46-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Dosimetry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958394723001000\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Dosimetry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958394723001000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative dosimetric study of spot-scanning proton therapy versus volumetric-modulated radiation therapy for extrahepatic bile duct cancer
This study aimed to compare the dose distributions and clarify the dosimetric characteristics of spot-scanning proton therapy (SSPT) and photon volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EBDC). This retrospective study included 10 patients with EBDC treated with real-time image-gated SSPT. Using the simultaneous integrated boost technique, the 2 prescription dose levels for planning target volumes were 72.6 and 44 Gy, delivered in 22 fractions. Plan quality comparisons were conducted by analyzing various parameters, including homogeneity, conformity, dose to organs at risk, and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for radiation-induced liver damage (RILD). The target dose distributions using SSPT were almost equivalent to those achieved using photon VMAT. There was a significant reduction in all liver dose parameters, the NTCP value for RILD, and kidney dose (mean, V12 Gy, and V18 Gy) in SSPT than in photon VMAT. No significant differences were observed in the intestinal doses in the high-dose area. Thus, compared with photon VMAT, SSPT for EBDC significantly reduced radiation doses to the liver and kidneys and has shown potential clinical benefits of reduced radiation-induced toxicity.
期刊介绍:
Medical Dosimetry, the official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists, is the key source of information on new developments for the medical dosimetrist. Practical and comprehensive in coverage, the journal features original contributions and review articles by medical dosimetrists, oncologists, physicists, and radiation therapy technologists on clinical applications and techniques of external beam, interstitial, intracavitary and intraluminal irradiation in cancer management. Articles dealing primarily with physics will be reviewed by a specially appointed team of experts in the field.