Antonia Windirsch, Olaf Reis, Hans Jörgen Grabe, Ekkehardt Kumbier
{"title":"[民主德国的精神病学是一个“利基”——介于适应和自主之间]。","authors":"Antonia Windirsch, Olaf Reis, Hans Jörgen Grabe, Ekkehardt Kumbier","doi":"10.1055/a-2186-3108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> With the help of statements from contemporary witnesses, it shall be deduced, if and to what extent Psychiatry was experienced as a shelter for employees and patients in the state controlled society of the GDR and which effort of adaptation to the authoritarian regime was needed to organize protected and protective spaces, here called \"niches\".</p><p><strong>Method: </strong> 74 guide-based interviews from subjects including former patients and different staff groups of the East german Psychiatry were analyzed qualitatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Many quotations show, that Psychiatry in the GDR was experienced as a \"niche\" for dissenting people and could offer a certain amount of protection for patients. On the other hand, the autonomy of the psychiatric care was often violated by political intrusions regarding individual treatments. Moreover, treatment autonomy was restricted by harsh shortages in supplies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Psychiatrists in the GDR could protect their patients through their actings and so Psychiatry could establish a \"niche\" for patients and employees. However, establishing such protected spaces required efforts in adaptation. In reverse, Psychiatry has also been politically instrumentalised - either directly through unjustified admissions and exit restrictions or indirectly by a stigmatization of dissenters and removing them from society.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Psychiatry in the GDR as a \\\"niche\\\" - Between adaptation and autonomy].\",\"authors\":\"Antonia Windirsch, Olaf Reis, Hans Jörgen Grabe, Ekkehardt Kumbier\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2186-3108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> With the help of statements from contemporary witnesses, it shall be deduced, if and to what extent Psychiatry was experienced as a shelter for employees and patients in the state controlled society of the GDR and which effort of adaptation to the authoritarian regime was needed to organize protected and protective spaces, here called \\\"niches\\\".</p><p><strong>Method: </strong> 74 guide-based interviews from subjects including former patients and different staff groups of the East german Psychiatry were analyzed qualitatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Many quotations show, that Psychiatry in the GDR was experienced as a \\\"niche\\\" for dissenting people and could offer a certain amount of protection for patients. On the other hand, the autonomy of the psychiatric care was often violated by political intrusions regarding individual treatments. Moreover, treatment autonomy was restricted by harsh shortages in supplies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Psychiatrists in the GDR could protect their patients through their actings and so Psychiatry could establish a \\\"niche\\\" for patients and employees. However, establishing such protected spaces required efforts in adaptation. In reverse, Psychiatry has also been politically instrumentalised - either directly through unjustified admissions and exit restrictions or indirectly by a stigmatization of dissenters and removing them from society.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2186-3108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2186-3108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Psychiatry in the GDR as a "niche" - Between adaptation and autonomy].
Background: With the help of statements from contemporary witnesses, it shall be deduced, if and to what extent Psychiatry was experienced as a shelter for employees and patients in the state controlled society of the GDR and which effort of adaptation to the authoritarian regime was needed to organize protected and protective spaces, here called "niches".
Method: 74 guide-based interviews from subjects including former patients and different staff groups of the East german Psychiatry were analyzed qualitatively.
Results: Many quotations show, that Psychiatry in the GDR was experienced as a "niche" for dissenting people and could offer a certain amount of protection for patients. On the other hand, the autonomy of the psychiatric care was often violated by political intrusions regarding individual treatments. Moreover, treatment autonomy was restricted by harsh shortages in supplies.
Conclusion: Psychiatrists in the GDR could protect their patients through their actings and so Psychiatry could establish a "niche" for patients and employees. However, establishing such protected spaces required efforts in adaptation. In reverse, Psychiatry has also been politically instrumentalised - either directly through unjustified admissions and exit restrictions or indirectly by a stigmatization of dissenters and removing them from society.