手优势、性别和体重指数对握力的影响。

IF 1.2 Q4 REHABILITATION
South African Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2023-10-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1923
Mercy A Agtuahene, Jonathan Quartey, Samuel Kwakye
{"title":"手优势、性别和体重指数对握力的影响。","authors":"Mercy A Agtuahene,&nbsp;Jonathan Quartey,&nbsp;Samuel Kwakye","doi":"10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hand grip strength (HGS) measurements serve as an objective measure of upper extremity function. Reliable hand strength evaluation is vital for assessing treatment effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index (BMI) on HGS among university students in Ghana.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In our cross-sectional study of 304 participants, height, weight, and BMI were measured using a stadiometer and weighing scale. Hand grip strength was assessed with a dynamometer. We compared HGS in dominant and non-dominant hands for males and females using a paired <i>t</i>-test and analysed the correlation between grip strength and weight, height, and BMI using Pearson's correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean HGS for right-hand dominant (RHD) male participants was 35.62 kg (± 7.36) for the right hand compared with 32.84 kg (± 7.36) for the left hand. For females RHD the mean HGS in the right hand was 24.60 kg (± 6.42) compared to 22.12 kg (± 5.37) in the left hand. The mean weight, height and BMI of participants were 62.86 kg (± 10.30), 1.67 m (± 0.09) and 22.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (± 4.9), respectively. A significant relationship existed between HGS and height (<i>r</i> = 0.492; <i>p</i> < 0.01) as well as HGS and BMI (<i>r</i> = 0.290; <i>p</i> < 0.01). However, no notable connection was found between HGS and weight (<i>r</i> = 0.001; <i>p</i> = 0.982).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hand grip strength was significantly stronger in the dominant hand of both males and females.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Physiotherapists should test HGS objectively and quantitatively for use in disease evaluation, diagnosis, and therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":44180,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"79 1","pages":"1923"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength.\",\"authors\":\"Mercy A Agtuahene,&nbsp;Jonathan Quartey,&nbsp;Samuel Kwakye\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hand grip strength (HGS) measurements serve as an objective measure of upper extremity function. Reliable hand strength evaluation is vital for assessing treatment effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index (BMI) on HGS among university students in Ghana.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In our cross-sectional study of 304 participants, height, weight, and BMI were measured using a stadiometer and weighing scale. Hand grip strength was assessed with a dynamometer. We compared HGS in dominant and non-dominant hands for males and females using a paired <i>t</i>-test and analysed the correlation between grip strength and weight, height, and BMI using Pearson's correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean HGS for right-hand dominant (RHD) male participants was 35.62 kg (± 7.36) for the right hand compared with 32.84 kg (± 7.36) for the left hand. For females RHD the mean HGS in the right hand was 24.60 kg (± 6.42) compared to 22.12 kg (± 5.37) in the left hand. The mean weight, height and BMI of participants were 62.86 kg (± 10.30), 1.67 m (± 0.09) and 22.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (± 4.9), respectively. A significant relationship existed between HGS and height (<i>r</i> = 0.492; <i>p</i> < 0.01) as well as HGS and BMI (<i>r</i> = 0.290; <i>p</i> < 0.01). However, no notable connection was found between HGS and weight (<i>r</i> = 0.001; <i>p</i> = 0.982).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hand grip strength was significantly stronger in the dominant hand of both males and females.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Physiotherapists should test HGS objectively and quantitatively for use in disease evaluation, diagnosis, and therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"1923\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623635/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1923\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:握力(HGS)测量是上肢功能的客观测量。可靠的手部力量评估对于评估治疗效果至关重要。目的:确定加纳大学生的手优势、性别和体重指数(BMI)对HGS的影响。方法:在我们对304名参与者的横断面研究中,使用视距仪和体重秤测量身高、体重和BMI。用测功机评估握力。我们使用配对t检验比较了男性和女性优势手和非优势手的HGS,并使用Pearson相关系数分析了握力与体重、身高和BMI之间的相关性。结果:右手占优势(RHD)男性参与者右手的平均HGS为35.62 kg(±7.36),而左手为32.84 kg(±7.3 6)。对于女性RHD,右手的平均HGS为24.60 kg(±6.42),而左手为22.12 kg(±5.37)。参与者的平均体重、身高和BMI分别为62.86 kg(±10.30)、1.67 m(±0.09)和22.9 kg/m2(±4.9)。HGS与身高(r=0.492;p<0.01)、HGS与BMI(r=0.290;p<0.01)呈显著相关,但与体重(r=0.001;p=0.982)无显著相关性。临床意义:物理治疗师应客观、定量地测试HGS,用于疾病评估、诊断和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength.

Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength.

Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength.

Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength.

Background: Hand grip strength (HGS) measurements serve as an objective measure of upper extremity function. Reliable hand strength evaluation is vital for assessing treatment effectiveness.

Objectives: To determine the influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index (BMI) on HGS among university students in Ghana.

Method: In our cross-sectional study of 304 participants, height, weight, and BMI were measured using a stadiometer and weighing scale. Hand grip strength was assessed with a dynamometer. We compared HGS in dominant and non-dominant hands for males and females using a paired t-test and analysed the correlation between grip strength and weight, height, and BMI using Pearson's correlation coefficient.

Results: The mean HGS for right-hand dominant (RHD) male participants was 35.62 kg (± 7.36) for the right hand compared with 32.84 kg (± 7.36) for the left hand. For females RHD the mean HGS in the right hand was 24.60 kg (± 6.42) compared to 22.12 kg (± 5.37) in the left hand. The mean weight, height and BMI of participants were 62.86 kg (± 10.30), 1.67 m (± 0.09) and 22.9 kg/m2 (± 4.9), respectively. A significant relationship existed between HGS and height (r = 0.492; p < 0.01) as well as HGS and BMI (r = 0.290; p < 0.01). However, no notable connection was found between HGS and weight (r = 0.001; p = 0.982).

Conclusion: Hand grip strength was significantly stronger in the dominant hand of both males and females.

Clinical implications: Physiotherapists should test HGS objectively and quantitatively for use in disease evaluation, diagnosis, and therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信