手优势、性别和体重指数对握力的影响。

IF 1 Q4 REHABILITATION
South African Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2023-10-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1923
Mercy A Agtuahene, Jonathan Quartey, Samuel Kwakye
{"title":"手优势、性别和体重指数对握力的影响。","authors":"Mercy A Agtuahene,&nbsp;Jonathan Quartey,&nbsp;Samuel Kwakye","doi":"10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hand grip strength (HGS) measurements serve as an objective measure of upper extremity function. Reliable hand strength evaluation is vital for assessing treatment effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index (BMI) on HGS among university students in Ghana.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In our cross-sectional study of 304 participants, height, weight, and BMI were measured using a stadiometer and weighing scale. Hand grip strength was assessed with a dynamometer. We compared HGS in dominant and non-dominant hands for males and females using a paired <i>t</i>-test and analysed the correlation between grip strength and weight, height, and BMI using Pearson's correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean HGS for right-hand dominant (RHD) male participants was 35.62 kg (± 7.36) for the right hand compared with 32.84 kg (± 7.36) for the left hand. For females RHD the mean HGS in the right hand was 24.60 kg (± 6.42) compared to 22.12 kg (± 5.37) in the left hand. The mean weight, height and BMI of participants were 62.86 kg (± 10.30), 1.67 m (± 0.09) and 22.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (± 4.9), respectively. A significant relationship existed between HGS and height (<i>r</i> = 0.492; <i>p</i> < 0.01) as well as HGS and BMI (<i>r</i> = 0.290; <i>p</i> < 0.01). However, no notable connection was found between HGS and weight (<i>r</i> = 0.001; <i>p</i> = 0.982).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hand grip strength was significantly stronger in the dominant hand of both males and females.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Physiotherapists should test HGS objectively and quantitatively for use in disease evaluation, diagnosis, and therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":44180,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"79 1","pages":"1923"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength.\",\"authors\":\"Mercy A Agtuahene,&nbsp;Jonathan Quartey,&nbsp;Samuel Kwakye\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hand grip strength (HGS) measurements serve as an objective measure of upper extremity function. Reliable hand strength evaluation is vital for assessing treatment effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index (BMI) on HGS among university students in Ghana.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In our cross-sectional study of 304 participants, height, weight, and BMI were measured using a stadiometer and weighing scale. Hand grip strength was assessed with a dynamometer. We compared HGS in dominant and non-dominant hands for males and females using a paired <i>t</i>-test and analysed the correlation between grip strength and weight, height, and BMI using Pearson's correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean HGS for right-hand dominant (RHD) male participants was 35.62 kg (± 7.36) for the right hand compared with 32.84 kg (± 7.36) for the left hand. For females RHD the mean HGS in the right hand was 24.60 kg (± 6.42) compared to 22.12 kg (± 5.37) in the left hand. The mean weight, height and BMI of participants were 62.86 kg (± 10.30), 1.67 m (± 0.09) and 22.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (± 4.9), respectively. A significant relationship existed between HGS and height (<i>r</i> = 0.492; <i>p</i> < 0.01) as well as HGS and BMI (<i>r</i> = 0.290; <i>p</i> < 0.01). However, no notable connection was found between HGS and weight (<i>r</i> = 0.001; <i>p</i> = 0.982).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hand grip strength was significantly stronger in the dominant hand of both males and females.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Physiotherapists should test HGS objectively and quantitatively for use in disease evaluation, diagnosis, and therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"1923\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623635/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1923\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:握力(HGS)测量是上肢功能的客观测量。可靠的手部力量评估对于评估治疗效果至关重要。目的:确定加纳大学生的手优势、性别和体重指数(BMI)对HGS的影响。方法:在我们对304名参与者的横断面研究中,使用视距仪和体重秤测量身高、体重和BMI。用测功机评估握力。我们使用配对t检验比较了男性和女性优势手和非优势手的HGS,并使用Pearson相关系数分析了握力与体重、身高和BMI之间的相关性。结果:右手占优势(RHD)男性参与者右手的平均HGS为35.62 kg(±7.36),而左手为32.84 kg(±7.3 6)。对于女性RHD,右手的平均HGS为24.60 kg(±6.42),而左手为22.12 kg(±5.37)。参与者的平均体重、身高和BMI分别为62.86 kg(±10.30)、1.67 m(±0.09)和22.9 kg/m2(±4.9)。HGS与身高(r=0.492;p<0.01)、HGS与BMI(r=0.290;p<0.01)呈显著相关,但与体重(r=0.001;p=0.982)无显著相关性。临床意义:物理治疗师应客观、定量地测试HGS,用于疾病评估、诊断和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength.

Background: Hand grip strength (HGS) measurements serve as an objective measure of upper extremity function. Reliable hand strength evaluation is vital for assessing treatment effectiveness.

Objectives: To determine the influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index (BMI) on HGS among university students in Ghana.

Method: In our cross-sectional study of 304 participants, height, weight, and BMI were measured using a stadiometer and weighing scale. Hand grip strength was assessed with a dynamometer. We compared HGS in dominant and non-dominant hands for males and females using a paired t-test and analysed the correlation between grip strength and weight, height, and BMI using Pearson's correlation coefficient.

Results: The mean HGS for right-hand dominant (RHD) male participants was 35.62 kg (± 7.36) for the right hand compared with 32.84 kg (± 7.36) for the left hand. For females RHD the mean HGS in the right hand was 24.60 kg (± 6.42) compared to 22.12 kg (± 5.37) in the left hand. The mean weight, height and BMI of participants were 62.86 kg (± 10.30), 1.67 m (± 0.09) and 22.9 kg/m2 (± 4.9), respectively. A significant relationship existed between HGS and height (r = 0.492; p < 0.01) as well as HGS and BMI (r = 0.290; p < 0.01). However, no notable connection was found between HGS and weight (r = 0.001; p = 0.982).

Conclusion: Hand grip strength was significantly stronger in the dominant hand of both males and females.

Clinical implications: Physiotherapists should test HGS objectively and quantitatively for use in disease evaluation, diagnosis, and therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信