医院骨科脊柱会诊的利用:评估卫生保健政策的影响。

Parker L Brush, Alexa Tomlak, Nick Pohl, Yunsoo Lee, Rajkishen Narayanan, Matthew H Meade, Mark J Lambrechts, Charles L Lawall, Jackson Weber, Amit Syal, Patrick O'Connor, Jose A Canseco, I David Kaye, Mark F Kurd, Alexander R Vaccaro, Chris K Kepler, Alan S Hilibrand, Gregory D Schroeder
{"title":"医院骨科脊柱会诊的利用:评估卫生保健政策的影响。","authors":"Parker L Brush, Alexa Tomlak, Nick Pohl, Yunsoo Lee, Rajkishen Narayanan, Matthew H Meade, Mark J Lambrechts, Charles L Lawall, Jackson Weber, Amit Syal, Patrick O'Connor, Jose A Canseco, I David Kaye, Mark F Kurd, Alexander R Vaccaro, Chris K Kepler, Alan S Hilibrand, Gregory D Schroeder","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Access to specialty and private practice providers has been a divisive policy issue over the last decade, complicated by the conflict between a reduction in government-funded health care reimbursement and the need for health care providers to sustain a financially sound practice. This study evaluates the orthopedic spine consult service at an academic tertiary care center at 2 separate time points over a 5-year period to better understand the impact of decreasing orthopedic reimbursement rates and the increasing prevalence of federally supported medical insurance on the access to specialty care. In total 500 patients in 2017 and 480 patients in 2021 were included for the final analysis. A higher percentage of consults in 2021 came from the emergency department (74.0% versus 60.4%, P < 0.001); however, the emergency department saw fewer spinal cord injuries (11.9% versus 21.4%, P < 0.001), and the spinal cord injuries were less severe (3.1% versus 6.2% Association Impairment Scale A or B, P = 0.034). A smaller percentage of patients in 2021 went on to receive orthopedic spine surgery following consultation (35.2% versus 43.8%, P = 0.007), and those receiving surgery had an operation performed farther out from the initial consultation (4.73 versus 4.09 days, P < 0.001). Additionally, fewer patients with Medicare insurance (23.5% versus 30.8%) and more patients with Medicaid insurance (20.2% versus 12.4%) were seen in 2021 compared with 2017 (P = 0.003). Overall, this study found an increased proportion of Medicaid patients seen by the spine consult service but a decrease in the acuity of consults. Measures to improve access to health insurance under the Affordable Care Act have revealed the complexity of this issue in health care. This study's findings have demonstrated that while more patients did have insurance coverage following the Affordable Care Act, they still face a barrier to accessing outpatient orthopedic spine providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":"38 6","pages":"300-305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization of In-Hospital Orthopaedic Spine Consultations: Evaluating the Impact of Health Care Policy.\",\"authors\":\"Parker L Brush, Alexa Tomlak, Nick Pohl, Yunsoo Lee, Rajkishen Narayanan, Matthew H Meade, Mark J Lambrechts, Charles L Lawall, Jackson Weber, Amit Syal, Patrick O'Connor, Jose A Canseco, I David Kaye, Mark F Kurd, Alexander R Vaccaro, Chris K Kepler, Alan S Hilibrand, Gregory D Schroeder\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Access to specialty and private practice providers has been a divisive policy issue over the last decade, complicated by the conflict between a reduction in government-funded health care reimbursement and the need for health care providers to sustain a financially sound practice. This study evaluates the orthopedic spine consult service at an academic tertiary care center at 2 separate time points over a 5-year period to better understand the impact of decreasing orthopedic reimbursement rates and the increasing prevalence of federally supported medical insurance on the access to specialty care. In total 500 patients in 2017 and 480 patients in 2021 were included for the final analysis. A higher percentage of consults in 2021 came from the emergency department (74.0% versus 60.4%, P < 0.001); however, the emergency department saw fewer spinal cord injuries (11.9% versus 21.4%, P < 0.001), and the spinal cord injuries were less severe (3.1% versus 6.2% Association Impairment Scale A or B, P = 0.034). A smaller percentage of patients in 2021 went on to receive orthopedic spine surgery following consultation (35.2% versus 43.8%, P = 0.007), and those receiving surgery had an operation performed farther out from the initial consultation (4.73 versus 4.09 days, P < 0.001). Additionally, fewer patients with Medicare insurance (23.5% versus 30.8%) and more patients with Medicaid insurance (20.2% versus 12.4%) were seen in 2021 compared with 2017 (P = 0.003). Overall, this study found an increased proportion of Medicaid patients seen by the spine consult service but a decrease in the acuity of consults. Measures to improve access to health insurance under the Affordable Care Act have revealed the complexity of this issue in health care. This study's findings have demonstrated that while more patients did have insurance coverage following the Affordable Care Act, they still face a barrier to accessing outpatient orthopedic spine providers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality\",\"volume\":\"38 6\",\"pages\":\"300-305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去十年中,获得专业和私人执业机构的机会一直是一个引起分歧的政策问题,政府资助的医疗保健报销的减少与医疗保健机构维持财务稳健执业的必要性之间的冲突使问题变得更加复杂。这项研究评估了一家学术三级护理中心在5年内两个不同时间点的骨科脊柱咨询服务,以更好地了解骨科报销率下降和联邦支持的医疗保险日益普及对获得专科护理的影响。2017年和2021年共有500名患者和480名患者被纳入最终分析。2021年,急诊科的咨询比例更高(74.0%对60.4%,P<0.001);然而,急诊科的脊髓损伤较少(11.9%对21.4%,P<0.001),脊髓损伤也较轻(3.1%对6.2%,关联损伤量表A或B,P=0.034)。2021年,咨询后接受脊柱矫形手术的患者比例较小(35.2%对43.8%,P=0.007),接受手术的患者在初次会诊后进行了手术(4.73天对4.09天,P<0.001)。此外,与2017年相比,2021年接受医疗保险的患者更少(23.5%对30.8%),接受医疗补助保险的患者更多(20.2%对12.4%)(P=0.003)。总体而言,这项研究发现,通过脊柱咨询服务就诊的医疗补助患者比例增加,但咨询的敏锐度下降。根据《平价医疗法案》改善医疗保险的措施揭示了医疗保健中这一问题的复杂性。这项研究的结果表明,尽管根据《平价医疗法案》,更多的患者确实有保险,但他们在获得门诊骨科脊柱医生方面仍然面临障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilization of In-Hospital Orthopaedic Spine Consultations: Evaluating the Impact of Health Care Policy.

Access to specialty and private practice providers has been a divisive policy issue over the last decade, complicated by the conflict between a reduction in government-funded health care reimbursement and the need for health care providers to sustain a financially sound practice. This study evaluates the orthopedic spine consult service at an academic tertiary care center at 2 separate time points over a 5-year period to better understand the impact of decreasing orthopedic reimbursement rates and the increasing prevalence of federally supported medical insurance on the access to specialty care. In total 500 patients in 2017 and 480 patients in 2021 were included for the final analysis. A higher percentage of consults in 2021 came from the emergency department (74.0% versus 60.4%, P < 0.001); however, the emergency department saw fewer spinal cord injuries (11.9% versus 21.4%, P < 0.001), and the spinal cord injuries were less severe (3.1% versus 6.2% Association Impairment Scale A or B, P = 0.034). A smaller percentage of patients in 2021 went on to receive orthopedic spine surgery following consultation (35.2% versus 43.8%, P = 0.007), and those receiving surgery had an operation performed farther out from the initial consultation (4.73 versus 4.09 days, P < 0.001). Additionally, fewer patients with Medicare insurance (23.5% versus 30.8%) and more patients with Medicaid insurance (20.2% versus 12.4%) were seen in 2021 compared with 2017 (P = 0.003). Overall, this study found an increased proportion of Medicaid patients seen by the spine consult service but a decrease in the acuity of consults. Measures to improve access to health insurance under the Affordable Care Act have revealed the complexity of this issue in health care. This study's findings have demonstrated that while more patients did have insurance coverage following the Affordable Care Act, they still face a barrier to accessing outpatient orthopedic spine providers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信