用于评估具有不同处方剂量的多个目标体积的治疗计划的广义拟合指数:广义剂量分布拟合指数。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Lingling Yan PhD, Yingjie Xu MD, Jianrong Dai PhD
{"title":"用于评估具有不同处方剂量的多个目标体积的治疗计划的广义拟合指数:广义剂量分布拟合指数。","authors":"Lingling Yan PhD,&nbsp;Yingjie Xu MD,&nbsp;Jianrong Dai PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.meddos.2023.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Purpose</h3><p>The differential fit index (<em>d</em>FI) and cumulative fit index (<em>c</em>FI) were defined in our previous study to evaluate the fit of isodose surfaces to the target volume. They were only applicable to plans for a single target volume. Therefore, this study aimed to generalize these indices for evaluating plans for multiple target volumes and different prescribed doses.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p><em>d</em>FI was redefined as the ratio of the integral dose of the volume occupied by an isodose surface to that of the union of all target volumes. <em>c</em>FI was defined as the integral of <em>d</em>FI from a certain dose level of interest to the prescribed dose to be evaluated. To evaluate the performance of the generalized fit index, brain metastasis, head and neck, lung cancer, liver cancer, and cervical cancer cases were selected. For each case, a pair of plans was designed, with one plan having a better fitting dose distribution. The dose fit of these plans was investigated using <em>c</em>FI, the dose gradient index (GI), and the conformity index (CI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 26 pairs of evaluations were performed. The correct evaluation rates for <em>c</em>FI, GI, and CI were 96%, 26.92%, and 92.31%, respectively, illustrating that GI was not valid for evaluating complex plans.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The generalized fit index proved effective for evaluating the dose fit of plans for multiple target volumes with different prescribed doses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49837,"journal":{"name":"Medical Dosimetry","volume":"49 2","pages":"Pages 143-149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958394723001012/pdfft?md5=6821b9279324d72b49935e4a7e1c47f1&pid=1-s2.0-S0958394723001012-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A generalized fit index for evaluating treatment plans of multiple target volumes with different prescribed dose: Generalized dose distribution fit index\",\"authors\":\"Lingling Yan PhD,&nbsp;Yingjie Xu MD,&nbsp;Jianrong Dai PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.meddos.2023.10.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Purpose</h3><p>The differential fit index (<em>d</em>FI) and cumulative fit index (<em>c</em>FI) were defined in our previous study to evaluate the fit of isodose surfaces to the target volume. They were only applicable to plans for a single target volume. Therefore, this study aimed to generalize these indices for evaluating plans for multiple target volumes and different prescribed doses.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p><em>d</em>FI was redefined as the ratio of the integral dose of the volume occupied by an isodose surface to that of the union of all target volumes. <em>c</em>FI was defined as the integral of <em>d</em>FI from a certain dose level of interest to the prescribed dose to be evaluated. To evaluate the performance of the generalized fit index, brain metastasis, head and neck, lung cancer, liver cancer, and cervical cancer cases were selected. For each case, a pair of plans was designed, with one plan having a better fitting dose distribution. The dose fit of these plans was investigated using <em>c</em>FI, the dose gradient index (GI), and the conformity index (CI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 26 pairs of evaluations were performed. The correct evaluation rates for <em>c</em>FI, GI, and CI were 96%, 26.92%, and 92.31%, respectively, illustrating that GI was not valid for evaluating complex plans.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The generalized fit index proved effective for evaluating the dose fit of plans for multiple target volumes with different prescribed doses.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Dosimetry\",\"volume\":\"49 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 143-149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958394723001012/pdfft?md5=6821b9279324d72b49935e4a7e1c47f1&pid=1-s2.0-S0958394723001012-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Dosimetry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958394723001012\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Dosimetry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958394723001012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:差分拟合指数(dFI)和累积拟合指数(cFI)是在我们之前的研究中定义的,用于评估等剂量表面与目标体积的拟合。它们仅适用于单一目标量的计划。因此,本研究旨在推广这些指标,用于评估多个目标量和不同处方剂量的计划。材料和方法:dFI被重新定义为等剂量表面占据的体积的积分剂量与所有目标体积的并集的积分剂量之比。cFI被定义为从感兴趣的特定剂量水平到待评估的规定剂量的dFI的积分。为了评估广义拟合指数的性能,选择脑转移、头颈部、癌症、癌症和癌症颈段病例。对于每种情况,都设计了一对方案,其中一个方案具有更好的拟合剂量分布。使用cFI、剂量梯度指数(GI)和一致性指数(CI)对这些方案的剂量拟合进行了研究。结果:总共进行了26对评估。cFI、GI和CI的正确评估率分别为96%、26.92%和92.31%,说明GI对评估复杂计划无效。结论:广义拟合指数在评估不同处方剂量的多个目标体积计划的剂量拟合方面是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A generalized fit index for evaluating treatment plans of multiple target volumes with different prescribed dose: Generalized dose distribution fit index

Background and Purpose

The differential fit index (dFI) and cumulative fit index (cFI) were defined in our previous study to evaluate the fit of isodose surfaces to the target volume. They were only applicable to plans for a single target volume. Therefore, this study aimed to generalize these indices for evaluating plans for multiple target volumes and different prescribed doses.

Materials and Methods

dFI was redefined as the ratio of the integral dose of the volume occupied by an isodose surface to that of the union of all target volumes. cFI was defined as the integral of dFI from a certain dose level of interest to the prescribed dose to be evaluated. To evaluate the performance of the generalized fit index, brain metastasis, head and neck, lung cancer, liver cancer, and cervical cancer cases were selected. For each case, a pair of plans was designed, with one plan having a better fitting dose distribution. The dose fit of these plans was investigated using cFI, the dose gradient index (GI), and the conformity index (CI).

Results

In total, 26 pairs of evaluations were performed. The correct evaluation rates for cFI, GI, and CI were 96%, 26.92%, and 92.31%, respectively, illustrating that GI was not valid for evaluating complex plans.

Conclusions

The generalized fit index proved effective for evaluating the dose fit of plans for multiple target volumes with different prescribed doses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Dosimetry
Medical Dosimetry 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Medical Dosimetry, the official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists, is the key source of information on new developments for the medical dosimetrist. Practical and comprehensive in coverage, the journal features original contributions and review articles by medical dosimetrists, oncologists, physicists, and radiation therapy technologists on clinical applications and techniques of external beam, interstitial, intracavitary and intraluminal irradiation in cancer management. Articles dealing primarily with physics will be reviewed by a specially appointed team of experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信